[1] Abele, M., Iver, M., & Farley, E. (2003). Bringing the district back in: The role of central office in improving instruction and student achievement. Baltimore, MD: Centre for Research on the Education of Students Placed at Risk, John Hopkins University.
[2] Anderson, S. E. (2003). The school district role in educational change: A review of the literature. Toronto: International Centre for Educational Change, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education.
[3] Bantwini, B. D., & King-McKenzie, E. (2011). District officials’ assumptions about teacher learning and change: Hindering factors to curriculum reform implementation in South Africa. International Journal of Education, 3, 1-25.
[4] Bantwini, B. D. (2010). How teachers perceive the new curriculum reform: Lessons from a school district in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 30, 83-90. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2009.06.002
[5] Bantwini, B. D. (2009). A Researcher’s experience in navigating the murky terrain of doing research in South Africa’s transforming schools. Perspectives in Education, 27, 30-39.
[6] Chisholm, L., & Leyendecker, R. (2008). Curriculum reform in post- 1990 Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 28, 195-205. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2007.04.003
[7] Corcoran, T., Fuhrman, S. H., & Belcher, C. L. (2001). The district role in instructional improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 78-84.
[8] Davis, K.S. (2003). “Change is hard”: What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning in innovative practices. Science Education, 87, 3-30. doi:10.1002/sce.10037
[9] Department of Education (2005). Conceptual and operational guidelines for the implementation of inclusive education: District-based support teams. Pretoria.
[10] Fiske, E. B., & Ladd, H. F., (2004). Elusive equity: Education reform in post-apartheid South Africa. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
[11] Grossman, P., Thompson, C. S., & Valencia, S. W. (2002). Focusing the concerns of new teachers: The district as teacher educator. In A. M. Hightower, M. S. Knapp, J. A. Marsh, & M. W. McLaughlin (Eds.), School districts and instructional renewal (p. 129-142), New York: Teacher College, Columbia University.
[12] Hargreaves, A. (2005). Educational change takes ages: Life, career and generational factors in teachers’ emotional responses to educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 967-983. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.007
[13] Hightower, A. M., Knapp, M. S., Marsh, J. A., & McLaughlin, M. W. (2002). The district role in instructional renewal: Setting the stage for dialogue. In A. M. Hightower, M. S. Knapp, J. A. Marsh, & M. W. McLaughlin (Eds.), School districts and instructional renewal (p. 1-6), New York: Teacher College, Columbia University.
[14] Jansen, D. J., (2002). Political symbolism as policy craft: Explaining non-reform in South African education after apartheid. Journal of Education Policy, 17, 199-215. doi:10.1080/02680930110116534
[15] Jansen, D. J., (2004). Race and education after ten years. Perspective in Education, 22, 117-128.
[16] Lemon, A. (2004). Redressing school inequalities in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 30, 269-290. doi:10.1080/0305707042000215392
[17] King, M. B. (2004). School- and district-level leadership for teacher workforce development: Enhancing teacher learning and capacity. In M. A. Smylie, & D. Miretsky (Eds.), Developing the teacher workforce: 103rd yearbook of the NSSE Part I (pp. 303-325). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[18] Marsh, J. A. (2002). How districts relate to states, schools, and communities: A review of emerging literature. In A. M. Hightower, M. S. Knapp, J. A. Marsh, & M. W. McLaughlin (Eds.), School districts and instructional renewal (p. 25-40), New York: Teacher College, Columbia University.
[19] Massell, D. (2000). The district role in building capacity: Four strategies. Philadelphia: Consortium for Policy Research in Education, Graduate School of Education, University of Pennsylvania.
[20] Massell, D., & Goertz, M. E. (2002). District strategies for building instructional capacity. In A. M. Hightower, M. S. Knapp, J. A. Marsh, & M. W. McLaughlin (Eds.), School districts and instructional renewal (p. 43-60), New York: Teacher College, Columbia University.
[21] Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
[22] Murphy, J., & Hallinger, P. (2001). Characteristics of instructionally effective school districts. Journal of Educational Research, 81, 175- 181.
[23] Nakabugo, M. G., & Sieb?rger, R. (2001). Curriculum reform and teaching in South Africa: Making a “paradigm shift”? International Journal of Educational Development, 21, 53-60. doi:10.1016/S0738-0593(00)00013-4
[24] Roberts, J. (2001). District development—The new hope for educational reform. Johannesburg: JET Education Services.
[25] Rorrer, A. K., Skrla, L., & Scheurich, J. J. (2008). Districts as institutional actors in educational reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44, 307-358. doi:10.1177/0013161X08318962
[26] Speck, M., & Knipe, C. (2005). Why can’t we get it right? Designing high-quality professional development for standard-based schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
[27] Spillane, J. P., & Callahan, K. C. (2000). Implementing state standards for science education: What district policy makers make of the hoopla. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 401-425. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200005)37:5<401::AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-D
[28] Spillane, J. P. (2000). Cognition and policy implementation: District policy makers and the reform of mathematics education. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 141-179. doi:10.1207/S1532690XCI1802_01
[29] Spillane, J. P. (2002). Local theories of teacher change: The pedagogy of district policies and programs. Teacher College Record, 104, 377- 420. doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00167
[30] Spillane, J. P., & Thompson, C. L. (1997). Reconstructing conceptions of local capacity: The local education agency’s capacity for ambitious instructional reform. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 185-203.
[31] Spillane, J. P., & Thompson, C. L. (1998). Looking at local districts’ capacity for ambitious reforms. Philadelphia, PA: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
[32] Stein, M. K., & D’Amico, L. (2002). The district as a professional learning laboratory. In A. M. Hightower, M. S. Knapp, J. A. Marsh, & M. W. McLaughlin (Eds.), School districts and instructional renewal (pp. 61-75), New York: Teacher College, Columbia University.
[33] Tyack, D. (2002). Forgotten players: How local school districts shaped american education. In A. M. Hightower, M. S. Knapp, J. A. Marsh, & M. W. McLaughlin (Eds.), School districts and instructional renewal (pp. 9-24), New York: Teacher College, Columbia University.
[34] Walberg, H. J., & Fowler, J. T. (1987). Expenditure and size efficiencies of public school districts. American Educational Research Association, 16, 5-13.
[35] Narsee, H. (2006). The common and contested meanings of education districts in South Africa. Pretoria: Faculty of Education, University of Pretoria. http://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-03232006-094442/unrestricted/00front.pdf