[1] Ahluwalia, R., Burnkrant, R. and Unnava, R. (2000) Consumer Response to Negative Publicity: The Moderating Role of Commitment. Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 203-214.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.37.2.203.18734
[2] Dawar, S. and Pillutla, M.M. (2000) Impact of Product-Harm Crises on Brand Equity: The Moderating Role of Consumer Expectations. Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 215-226.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.37.2.215.18729
[3] Huang, M.X., Xie, T.T. and Feng, X.L. (2010) How Do Ambivalent Consumers Interpret Diversified Word-of-Mouth Information? Acta Psychologica Sinica, 42, 998-1010.
[4] Gajdos, T. (2013) Jean-Christophe Vergnaud. Decisions with Conflicting and Imprecise Information. Social Choice and Welfare, 41, 427-452.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00355-012-0691-1
[5] Jiang, X.D., Gao, W.H. and Liang, X. (2013) Effects of Conflicting Information on Consumers’ Information Search Behavior: A Study Based on Functional Food Health Claims. Finance and Trade Research, 24, 114-121.
[6] Cheung, M.Y., Luo, C., Sia, C.L. and Chen, H.P. (2009) Credibility of Electronic Word-of-Mouth: Informational and Normative Determinants of On-line Consumer Recommendations. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 13, 9-38.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415130402
[7] Sun, C.H. and Liu, Y.Z. (2009) An Experimental Study on Message Credibility of eWOM. Collected Essays on Finance and Economics, 4, 96-102.
[8] Moorman, C., Luce, M.F. and Bettman, J.R. (2008) Change, Change, Change: Evolving Health Guidelines, Preventive Health Behaviors, and Interventions to Mitigate Harm. Association for Consumer Research Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA.
[9] Naylor, R.W., Droms, C.M. and Haws, K.L. (2009) Eating with a Purpose: Consumer Response to Functional Food Health Claims in Conflicting Versus Complementary Information Environments. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 28, 221-233.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jppm.28.2.221
[10] Heckler, S.E. and Childers, T.L. (1992) The Role of Expectancy and Relevancy in Memory for Verbal and Visual Information: What Is Incongruency. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 475-492.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209275
[11] Meyers-Levy, J. and Tybout, A.M. (1989) Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 39-54.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209192
[12] Jonas, K. and Diehl, M. (1997) Effects of Attitudinal Ambivalence on Information Processing and Attitude-Intention Consistency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 190-210.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1996.1317
[13] Roehm, M.L. and Tybout, A.M. (2006) When Will a Brand Scandal Spill Over, and How Should Competitors Respond? Journal of Marketing Research, 43, 366-373.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.3.366
[14] Bendapudi, N. and Berry, L.L. (1997) Customers’ Motivations for Maintaining Relationships with Service Providers. Journal of Retailing, 73, 15-37.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4359(97)90013-0
[15] Wang, X.Y. (2010) Research Overview of the Effect of Brand Equity in Negative Marketing Event. Foreign Economics & Management, 2, 45-50.
[16] Tian, Y., Wang, H.Z. and Liu, W.M. (2014) Can Brand Commitment Resist Negative Publicity?—The Moderate Effect of Regulatory Focus. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 6, 864-875.
[17] Raju, S. and Unnava, R. (2006) The Role of Arousal in Commitment: An Explanation for the Number of Counterarguments. Journal of Consumer Research, 33, 173-178.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/506298
[18] Herr, P.M., Kardes, F.R. and Kim, J. (1991) Effects of Word-of-Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 454-462.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/208570