JSSM  Vol.2 No.3 , September 2009
A Primary Robustness Optimization Strategy of Multi-Item and Low-Volume Process
Abstract: Multi-item and low-volume process is a production system with multi-input source, interactions between input variables, and frequently changes of system state, etc. Strong interactions between input variables and time-varying of input variables cause poor robustness and large variation range of output quality, which produces high cost, heavy waste and low efficiency of multi-item and low-volume process. Robustness optimization of multi-item and low-volume process is a new, important and need-to-deep research field with multi-item and low-volume production system prevails. It proposed a strategy enhancing robustness of multi-item and low-volume process by Taguchi robust design. Firstly, build and analyze a fitting output response model of multi-item and low-volume process after taking the adjustable variables (or time-varying variables) corresponding to each item and interaction between input variables into fitting output response model of multi-item and low-volume process as input variables uniformly, and treating the parameter value of time-varying variables corresponding to each item as level value of the adjustable variables (or signal factors) of process. Secondly, present robustness evaluation index based on evidential theory, desirability function and dual response surface etc. Finally, choose the proper experiment type and optimize the process. And then the robustness optimization of multi-item and low-volume process can be reached.
Cite this paper: nullJ. CHE, "A Primary Robustness Optimization Strategy of Multi-Item and Low-Volume Process," Journal of Service Science and Management, Vol. 2 No. 3, 2009, pp. 204-208. doi: 10.4236/jssm.2009.23024.

[1]   R. Jeyapaul, P. Shahabudeen, and K. Krishnaiah, “Qual-ity management research by considering multi-response problems in the Taguchi method-a review,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, No. 26, pp. 1331-1337, 2004.

[2]   G. E. P. Box, “Signal-to-noise ratios, performance criteria, and transformations,” Technometrics, No. 30, pp. 1-40, 1988.

[3]   R. V. León, A. C. Shoemaker, and R. N. Kacker, “Performance measures independent of adjustment: An explanation and extension of Taguchi’s signal-to-noise ra-tios,” Technometrics, No. 29, pp. 253-285, 1987.

[4]   V. N. Nair, “Taguchi’s parameter design: A panel discus-sion,” Technometrics, No. 34, pp. 127-161, 1992.

[5]   L. Z. Chen, “Robust design,” Machine Industry Press, Beijing, 1999.

[6]   D. B. Parkinson, “The application of a robust design method to tolerancing,” Journal of Mechanical Design, No. 122, pp. 149-154, 2000.

[7]   J. C. Xu and Y. Z. Ma, “Measurement methods for robust multivariate quality characteristics,” Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, No. 19, pp. 45-48, 1999.

[8]   A. Parkinson, “Robust mechanical design using engineering models,” Journal of Mechanical Design, No. 117, pp. 48-54, 1995.

[9]   A. Parkinson, C. Sorensen, and N. Pourhassan, “A general approach for robust optimal design,” Journal of Mechanical Design, No. 115, pp. 74-80, 1993.

[10]   W. Chen, J. K. Allen, K. -L. Tsui, and F. Mistree, “Procedure for robust design minimizing variations caused by noise factors and control factors,” Journal of Mechanical Design, No. 118, pp. 478-485, 1996.

[11]   A. D. Belegundu and S. H. Zhang, “Robustness of design through minimum sensitivity. Journal of Mechanical design,” No. 114, pp. 213-217, 1992.

[12]   R. H. Myers and D. C. Montgomery, “Response surface methodology: Process and product optimization using designed experiments,” Wiley Interscience Publication, New York, 2002.

[13]   A. C. Shoemaker, K. -L. Tsui, and C. F. J. Wu, “Economical experimentation methods for robust parameter design,” Technometrics, No. 33, pp. 415-427, 1991.

[14]   J. M. Lucas, “How to achieve a robust process using response surface methodology,” Journal of Quality Tech-nology, No. 26, pp. 248-260, 1994.

[15]   R. V. Geof and H. M. Raymond, “Combining Taguchi and response surface philosophies: A dual response approach,” Journal of Qualify Technology, No. 22, pp. 38- 45, 1990.

[16]   Y. Q. Li, Z. S. Cui, J. Chen, et al., “Six sigma robust design methodology based on response surface model,” Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, No. 40, pp. 201-205, 2006.