Back
 AJIBM  Vol.6 No.5 , May 2016
The Comparison of Glass Ceiling Perception of Employees Working in Public and Private Enterprises
Abstract: Glass ceiling syndrome can be described as invisible and unbreakable barriers that keep a special group, such as women or any minorities, from progressing in their professional career, regardless of their ability or qualifications. Unseen barriers prevent women from promotion and, workforce. Gender-based discrimination in promotions is more intense at higher levels, but it is felt in every stage of business life. In this study, the glass ceiling perception of men and women employees working in public and private sectors was targeted by evaluating some variables. As a result of the study, it is expressed that women confront the glass ceiling syndrome much more than men. The factors affecting the glass ceiling were identified as gender, age, marital status, promotion, working in public or private sector and additional income.
Cite this paper: Sever, H. (2016) The Comparison of Glass Ceiling Perception of Employees Working in Public and Private Enterprises. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 6, 577-588. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2016.65054.
References

[1]   Elacqua, T.C., Beehr, T.A., Hansen, C.P. and Webster, J. (2009) Managers’ Beliefs about the Glass Ceiling: Interpersonal and Organizational Factors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 285-294.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/036168430903300304

[2]   Lockwood, N. (2004) The Glass Ceiling: Domestic and International Perspectives. Human Resource Magazine Research Quarterly, 1-49.

[3]   Weyer, B. (2007) Twenty Years Later: Explaining the Persistence of the Glass Ceiling for Women Leaders. Women in Management Review, 22, 482-496.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09649420710778718

[4]   Kirman, M.A. (2011) The Glossary of Religion Sociology, Second Press. Ragbet Publication Press, Istanbul.

[5]   Hirata, H., Laborie, F., Le Doare, H. and Senotier, D. (2009) The Dictionary of Feminist Theory. Translated by G. Acar-Savran, Kanat Kitap Publication, Istanbul.

[6]   Bhasin, K. (2003) Gender. Translated by K. Ay, Kadin Dayanisma Vakfi Publication, Istanbul.

[7]   Bandura, A. (2001) Socialcognitivetheory: An Agenticperspective. Annualreview of psychology, 52, 1-26.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1

[8]   Kohlberg, L. (1984) The Psychology of Moral Development: The Nature and Validity of Moral Stages. Vol. 2. Harpercollins College Div.

[9]   Bem, S.L. (1974) The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0036215

[10]   Bem, S.L. (1977) On the Utility of Alternative Procedures for Assessing Psychological Androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 155-162.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.45.2.196

[11]   Aries, E. (1996) Men and Women in Interaction: Reconsidering the Differences. Oxford University Press.

[12]   Eagly, A.H., Wood, W. and Diekman, A.B. (2000) Social Role Theory of Sex Differences and Similarities: A Current Appraisal. In: Eckes, T. and Trautner, H.M., Eds., The Developmental Social Psychology of Gender, Psychology Press, Taylor & Francis Group, New Jersey, 123-174.

[13]   Ilkkaracan, I. (1998) Urban Women and Work Life. Bilanço 98: 75 Yilda Kadinlarve Erkekler. Tarih Vakfi Publication, Istanbul, 285-302.

[14]   Negiz, N. and Yemen, A. (2011) FemaleAdministrators in Public Organizations: Female Problematique in Administration in Terms of Administrator and Employee. Süleyman Demirel University Faculty of Arts and Sciences Journal of Social Sciences, 24, 195-214.

[15]   Mercanlioglu, Ç. (2009) Gender-Based Inequality; Executives Challenges and Costs of Women Balancing Work and Private Lives. International-Interdisciplinary Congress on Women’s Studies, Sakarya University Press, 35-44.

[16]   Kutanis, R.Ö. and Alparslan, S. (2006) Are Profiles of Women Entrepreneurs and Managers Different? Afyon Kocatepe University, Journal of IIBF, 8, 139-153.

[17]   Terzioglu, F. and Taskin, L. (2008) Reflections of Social Gender Role on Female Leadership Behavior and Nursing Profession. Journal of Cumhuriyet University School of Nursing, 12, 62-67.

[18]   Bridge, B. (2003) Women in Educational Management. Beyaz Yayinlari, Istanbul.

[19]   Karaca, A. (2007) Career Barriers for Women Executives—An Applied Research on Glass Ceiling Syndrome. Dissertation Thesis, Selçuk University, Konya.

[20]   Needle, D. (2010) Business in Context: An Introduction to Business and Its Environment. Cengage Learning EMEA.

[21]   Ravasi, D. and Majken, S. (2006) Responding to Organizational Identity Threats: Exploring the Role of Organizational Culture. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 433-458.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2006.21794663

[22]   Bilimoria, D., Joy, S. and Liang, X.F. (2008) Breaking Barriers and Creating Inclusiveness: Lessons of Organizational Transformation to Advance Women Faculty in Academic Science and Engineering. Human Resource Management, 47, 423-441.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20225

[23]   Lewis, A.E. and Fagenson, E.A. (1995) Strategies for Developing Women Managers: How Well Do They Fulfill Their Objectives? Journal of Management Development, 14, 39-53.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02621719510078885

[24]   McKeen, C.A. and Richardson, A.F. (1992) Still Bumping Up against the Glass Ceiling. CMA Magazine, 66, 22-26.

[25]   Zane, N.C. (2002) The Glass Ceiling Is the Floor My Boss Walks on Leadership Challenges in Managing Diversity. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 38, 334-354.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0021886302038003005

[26]   Anafarta, N., Sarvan, F. and Yapici, N. (2008) Perception of Glass Ceiling of Female Managers in the Hospitality Enterprises: A Survey in the City of Antalya. Akdeniz University Journal of Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 15, 111-137.

 
 
Top