Exploring Agritourism Experience and Perceptions of Pork Production

Ann M.  Cummins; Nicole J.  Olynk Widmar; Joan R.  Fulton; Candace  C. Croney

doi:10.4236/as.2016.74024

Ann M. Cummins¹, Nicole J. Olynk Widmar¹^*, Candace C. Croney², Joan R. Fulton¹

Abstract: The interest of consumers in farming activities is evident and agricultural producers have responded to this increasing interest in a number of ways, including inviting visitors to farm operations through tourism or farm visits. Livestock industries, in particular, are interacting with the public in numerous ways, including via marketing channels for their products, interacting with community leaders and community members in regard to location siting and regulations, and inviting people onto their operations via agritourism. An improved understanding of who visits agricultural locations (particularly livestock operations) and consumers’ perceptions about livestock agriculture is needed in order to begin to understand the possible relationships between on-farm experiences and consumers’ perceptions. Thus, it is important to gain a deeper understanding in consumers’ interests, including their levels of concern for production process attributes, such as animal welfare, relative to product attributes like price and taste. This analysis investigates the demographics of consumers who have (and have not) visited various agritourism operations, studies differences in preferences for (or perceptions of) animal welfare relative to other pork attributes between consumers who have or have not visited a livestock operation, as well as amongst consumers with varying levels of involvement in household food production. Indeed the relationships explored are between having visited a livestock operation and the perceptions. This study found that 69% of participants had visited a livestock operation (pig farm, dairy farm, and/or horse farm) at some point. The majority of respondents agreed that agriculture was an important industry, yet, those who had visited livestock operations were more likely to note concerns about the impact of livestock operations on water quality in their county.

Keywords: Agritourism, Animal Welfare, Best-Worst Scaling, Pork Production

Cite this paper: Cummins, A. , Olynk Widmar, N. , C. Croney, C. and Fulton, J. (2016) Exploring Agritourism Experience and Perceptions of Pork Production. Agricultural Sciences, 7, 239-249. doi: 10.4236/as.2016.74024.

References

[1] Carpio, C.E., Wohlgenant, M.K. and Boonsaeng, T. (2008) The Demand For Agritourism in the United States. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 33, 254-269.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/41220626

[2] McKendree, M.G.S., Croney, C.C. and Widmar, N.J.O. (2014) Effects of Demographic Factors and Information Sources on United States Consumer Perception of Animal Welfare. Journal of Animal Science, 92, 3161-3173.

[3] McKendree, M.G.S., Croney, C.C. and Widmar, N.J.O. (2014) Current Factors Influencing Perceptions of Animals and Their Welfare. Journal of Animal Science, 92, 1821-1831.

[4] Olynk Widmar, N.J. and Ortega, D.L. (2014) Comparing Consumer Preferences for Livestock Production Process Attributes Across Products, Species, and Modeling Methods. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 46, 375-391.

[5] Olynk, N.J., Tonsor, G.T. and Wolf, C.A. (2010) Consumer Willingness to Pay for Livestock Credence Attribute Claim Verification. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 35, 261-280.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/41960517

[6] Lusk, J. and Briggeman, B. (2009) Food Values. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91, 184-196.

[7] McKendree, M.G.S., Widmar, B.O., Ortega, D.L. and Foster, K.A. (2013) Consumer Preferences for Verified Pork-Rearing Practices in the Production of Ham Products. Journal of Agricultural and Resources Economics, 38, 397-417.
http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/165935/2/JARE,Dec2013,%237,
McKendree,pp397G%C3%87%C3%B4417.pdf

[8] Tonsor, G., Nicole J Olynk, and Christopher Wolf. (2009) Consumer Preferences for Animal Welfare Attributes: The Case of Gestation Crates. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 41, 713-730.

[9] Sacket, H.M., Shupp, R. and Tonsor, G. (2013) Consumer Perceptions of Sustainable Farming Practices: A Best-Worst Scenario. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 42, 275-290.

[10] Flanigan, S., Blackstock, K. and Hunter, C. (2014) Agritourism from the Perspective of Providers and Visitors: A Topology-Based Study. Tourism Management, 40, 394-405.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.07.004

[11] Cummins, A.M., Widmar, N.J.O. and Croney, C.C. (2016) Understanding Consumer Pork Attribute Preferences. Theoretical Economic Letters, 6, 166-177.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/tel.2016.62019

[12] Gao, Z.F., House, L.A .and Bi, X. (2012) Finding True Consumer Attitudes: Do Validation Questions Help? Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida, Gainesville.
http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/123922/1/aaea-poster-05-18.pdf

[13] U.S. Census Bureau (2014) DP-1 Profile of General Population and Housing Characteristics: 2010, 2010 Demographic Profile Data.
http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview
.xhtml?pid=DEC_10_DP_DPDP1&prodType=table

[14] U.S. Census Bureau (2008-2012) DP01: Selected Economics: 2008-2012 American Community Survey 5-Year Estimates.
http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_12_5YR_DP03&prodType=table

[15] U.S. Census Bureau (2013) Annual Estimates of Housing Units for the United States, Regions, Divisions, States and Counties: April 1, 2010 to July 1, 2013: 2013 Population Estimates.
http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?
pid=PEP_2013_PEPANNHU&prodType=table

[16] U.S. Census Bureau (2014) Educational Attainment: 2014 American Community Survey-One Year Estimates.
http://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=ACS_14_1YR_S1501&prodType=table

[17] Rothgerber, H. and Mican, F. (2014) Childhood Pet Ownership, Attachment to Pets, and Subsequent Meat Avoidance. The Mediating Role of Empathy towards Animals. Appetite, 79, 11-17.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.03.032