Back
 EPE  Vol.3 No.3 , July 2011
Spatial Reactor Dynamics and Thermo Hydraulic Behavior Simulation of a Large AGR Nuclear Power Reactor in Response to a Reactivity Step Change Disturbance
Abstract: In this article, two-dimensional partial differential equations with time representation of nuclear power reactor kinetics are considered for spatial reactor dynamics and thermo hydraulic behavior analysis of a large thermal advanced gas cooled reactor (AGR) type used for nuclear power generation. The equations include the neutron flux equation and delayed neutron precursor concentration, together with taking into account the equations to represent the thermo hydraulic behavior of the fuel, coolant and moderator temperatures. These equations are solved numerically using the finite difference method. For time propagation, an implicit method is applied. The desired initial condition for the reactor to stay at stable critical condition is established by finding the correct value of reactivity. The reactivity disturbance effect in the reactor is studied for different cases and presented for high reactivity values. The model was developed for the analysis of a large AGR with 2000 MWe for future power generation. The results show that the model not only behaves stably but also predicts the results physically for all the various parameters.
Cite this paper: nullM. Ansari and R. Marzooghi, "Spatial Reactor Dynamics and Thermo Hydraulic Behavior Simulation of a Large AGR Nuclear Power Reactor in Response to a Reactivity Step Change Disturbance," Energy and Power Engineering, Vol. 3 No. 3, 2011, pp. 366-375. doi: 10.4236/epe.2011.33047.
References

[1]   W. Wulff, “Major Systems Codes, Capabilities and Limitations,” EPRI, WS-8-212, 1981.

[2]   “Physical Benchmarking Exercise,” DOE/EPRI, Second International Workshop, of Two-Phase Flow Fundamentals, Rensselar Polytechnic Institute, 1987, Troy, NY, USA.

[3]   P. Groudev and A. Stefanova, “Validation of RELAP5/ MOD3.2 Model on Trip off One Main Coolant Pump for VVER 440/V230,” Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 236, No. 12, 2006, pp. 1275-1281. doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2005.11.011

[4]   H. Arab-Alibeik and S. Setayeshi, “An Adaptive-Cost-Function Optimal Controller Design for a PWR Nuclear Reactor,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, Vol. 30, No. 6, 2003, pp. 739-754. doi:10.1016/S0306-4549(02)00116-0

[5]   H. Arab-Alibeik and S. Setayeshi, “Adaptive Control of a PWR Core Power Using Neural Networks,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, Vol. 32, No. 6, 2005, pp. 588-605. doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2004.11.004

[6]   M. Marseguerra, E. Zio and R. Canetta, “Using Genetic Algorithms for Calibrating Simplified Models of Nuclear Reactor Dynamics,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, Vol. 31, No. 11, 2004, pp. 1219-1250. doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2004.03.001

[7]   L. Wengfeng, L. Zhengpei, L. Fu and W. Yaqi, “The Three-Dimensional Power Distribution Control in Load Following of the Heating Reactor,” Annals of Nuclear Energy, Vol. 28, No. 8, 2001, pp. 741-754. doi:10.1016/S0306-4549(00)00091-8

[8]   I. S. Sadek and R. V. Vendetham, “Optimal Control of Distributed Nuclear Reactors with Pointwise Controllers,” Mathematical and Computer Modeling, Vol. 32, No. 3-4, 2000, pp. 341-348. doi:10.1016/S0895-7177(00)00139-4

[9]   W. M. Stacey, “Nuclear Reactor Physics,” John Wiley, Hoboken, 2001.

[10]   S. Glasstone and A. Sensonske, “Nuclear Reactor Engineering,” Chapman and Hall, London, 1994.

 
 
Top