LCE  Vol.7 No.1 , March 2016
Policies and Consumption-Based Carbon Emissions from a Top-Down and a Bottom-Up Perspective
Abstract: Two major approaches for calculating consumption-based carbon emissions can be distinguished: top-down approaches, in the form of multi-regional input-output (MRIO) models, and bottom-up approaches, in the form of life cycle assessment (LCA). Both approaches have pros and cons and are very data-intensive. Several MRIO databases have been developed and published over the past years. These databases, which have been refined and validated, will be used for policy analysis. As LCA is usually only applied to very specific products and product groups, analysis is limited and many products have not yet been looked at. This paper makes use of both a top-down and bottom-up approach to calculate the impacts of different policy measures on the development of consumption-based carbon emissions in the EU28 and on emissions elsewhere in the world. The policy examples used are the EU’s CO2 in Cars Regulations and the South African renewable energy initiative. The results from the top-down approach are then compared with those from the bottom-up approach. Both bottom-up and top-down approaches use the same underlying assumptions regarding the impacts, but due to the very different nature of the methodologies, differences in the results are observed, though sign and scope of the results are the same for the two cases. Part of the deviations can be explained by differences in methodology and scenario design due to these differences. It can be concluded that bottom-up and top-down approaches can and need to be applied to different policies and are generally complementary.
Cite this paper: Wiebe, K. , Gandy, S. and Lutz, C. (2016) Policies and Consumption-Based Carbon Emissions from a Top-Down and a Bottom-Up Perspective. Low Carbon Economy, 7, 21-35. doi: 10.4236/lce.2016.71003.

[1]   Peters, G. and Solli, C. (2010) Global Carbon Footprints: Methods and Import/Export Corrected Results from the Nordic Countries in Global Carbon Footprint Studies. TemaNord. Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, Denmark.

[2]   Lenzen, M. (2001) Errors in Conventional and Input-Output-Based Life Cycle Inventories. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 4, 127-148.

[3]   Moran, D., McBain, D., Kanemoto, K., Lenzen, M. and Geschke, A. (2015) Global Supply Chains of Coltan: A Hybrid Life Cycle Assessment Study Using a Social Indicator. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19, 357-365.

[4]   Moran, D., Petersone, M. and Verones, F. (2016) On the Suitability of Input-Output Analysis for Calculating Product-Specific Biodiversity Footprints. Ecological Indicators, 60, 192-201.

[5]   Schoer, K., Wood, R., Arto, I. and Weinzettel, J. (2013) Estimating Raw Material Equivalents on a Macro-Level: Comparison of Multi-Regional Input-Output Analysis and Hybrid LCI-IO. Environmental Science & Technology, 47, 14282-14289.

[6]   Weinzettel, J., Steen-Olsen, K., Hertwich, E.G., Borucke, M. and Galli, A. (2014) Ecological Footprint of Nations: Comparison of Process Analysis, and Standard and Hybrid Multiregional Input-Output Analysis. Ecological Economics, 101, 115-126.

[7]   Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M.Z., Ekvall, T., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D. and Suh, S. (2009) Recent Developments in Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 1-21.

[8]   International Organisation for Standardisation (1998) ISO 14044 Environmental Management—Life Cycle Assessment— Principles and Framework. International Organisation for Standardisation, Geneva.

[9]   Hertwich, E.G., Gibon, T., Bouman, E.A., Arvesen, A., Suh, S., Heath, G.A., Bergesen, J.D., Ramirez, A., Vega, M.I. and Shi, L. (2015) Integrated Life-Cycle Assessment of Electricity-Supply Scenarios Confirms Global Environmental Benefit of Low-Carbon Technologies. PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America), 112, 6277-6282.

[10]   Wiedmann, T., Wilting, H.C., Lenzen, M., Lutter, S. and Palm, V. (2011b) Quo Vadis MRIO? Methodological, Data and Institutional Requirements for Multi-Region Input-Output Analysis. Ecological Economics, 70, 1937-1945.

[11]   Wiedmann, T. and Barret, J. (2013) Current and Future Policy Applications of MRIO Research. Chapter 27. In: Murray, J. and Lenzen, M., Eds., The Sustainability Practitioner’s Guide to Multi-Regional Input-Output Analysis, Common Ground Publishing, Illinois, 267-272.

[12]   Peters, G.P., Andrew, R. and Lennox, J. (2011) Constructing an Environmentally-Extended Multi-Regional Input-Output Table Using the GTAP Database. Economic Systems Research, 23, 131-152.

[13]   Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Kanemoto, K. and Geschke, A. (2013) Building EORA: A Global Multi-Region Input-Output Database at High Country and Sector Resolution. Economic Systems Research, 25, 20-49.

[14]   Nakano, S., Okamura, A., Sakurai, N., Suzuki, M., Tojo, Y. and Yamano, N. (2009) The Measurement of CO2 Embodiments in International Trade: Evidence from the Harmonised Input-Output and Bilateral Trade Database. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD).

[15]   Wiebe, K.S., Bruckner, M., Giljum, S. and Lutz, C. (2012a) Calculating Energy-Related CO2 Emissions Embodied in International Trade Using a Global Input-Output Model. Economic Systems Research, 24, 113-139.

[16]   Wiebe, K.S., Bruckner, M., Giljum, S., Lutz, C. and Polzin, C. (2012b) Carbon and Materials Embodied in the International Trade of Emerging Economies: A Multiregional Input-Output Assessment of Trends between 1995 and 2005. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 16, 636-646.

[17]   Tukker, A., Poliakov, E., Heijungs, R., Hawkins, T., Neuwahl, F., Rueda-Cantuche, J.M., Giljum, S., Moll, S., Oosterhaven, J. and Bouwmeester, M. (2009) Towards a Global Multi-Regional Environmentally Extended Input-Output Database. Ecological Economics, 68, 1928-1937.

[18]   Timmer, M. (2012) The World Input-Output Database (WIOD): Contents, Sources and Methods. Working Paper Number 10, April 2012, Version 0.9.

[19]   Tukker, A. and Dietzenbacher, E. (2013) Global Multiregional Input-Output Frameworks: An Introduction and Outlook. Economic Systems Research, 25, 1-19.

[20]   Peters, G.P., Davis, S.J. and Andrew, R. (2012) A Synthesis of Carbon in International Trade. Biogeosciences, 9, 3247-3276.

[21]   Lenzen, M., Kanemoto, K., Moran, D. and Geschke, A. (2012) Mapping the Structure of the World Economy. Environmental Science & Technology, 46, 8374-8381.

[22]   Suh, S. and Nakamura, S. (2007) Five Years in the Area of Input-Output and Hybrid LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 12, 351.

[23]   Wiedmann, T.O., Suh, S., Feng, K., Lenzen, M., Acquaye, A., Scott, K. and Barrett, J.R. (2011a) Application of Hybrid Life Cycle Approaches to Emerging Energy Technologies—The Case of Wind Power in the UK. Environmental Science & Technology, 45, 5900-5907.

[24]   Bullard, C.W., Penner, P.S. and Pilati, D.A. (1978) Net Energy Analysis: Handbook for Combining Process and Input-Output Analysis. Resources and Energy, 1, 267-313.

[25]   Suh, S. and Huppes, G. (2005) Methods for Life Cycle Inventory of a Product. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 687-697.

[26]   Crawford, R.H. (2008) Validation of a Hybrid Life-Cycle Inventory Analysis Method. Journal of Environmental Management, 88, 496-506.

[27]   Lenzen, M. and Crawford, R. (2009) The Path Exchange Method for Hybrid LCA. Environmental Science & Technology, 43, 8251-8256.

[28]   Feng, K., Chapagain, A., Suh, S., Pfister, S. and Hubacek, K. (2011) Comparison of Bottom-Up and Top-Down Approaches to Calculating the Water Footprints of Nations. Economic Systems Research, 23, 371-385.

[29]   Treloar, G.J. (1997) Extracting Embodied Energy Paths from Input-Output Tables: Towards an Input-Output-Based Hybrid Energy Analysis Method. Economic Systems Research, 9, 375-391.

[30]   Lenzen, M. and Dey, C. (2000) Truncation Error in Embodied Energy Analyses of Basic Iron and Steel Products. Energy, 25, 577-585.

[31]   Nakamura, S., Murakami, S., Nakajima, K. and Nagasaka, T. (2008) Hybrid Input-Output Approach to Metal Production and Its Application to the Introduction of Lead-Free Solders. Environmental Science & Technology, 42, 3843-3848.

[32]   Liu, C.-H., Lenzen, M. and Murray, J. (2012) A Disaggregated Emissions Inventory for Taiwan with Uses in Hybrid Input-Output Life Cycle Analysis (IO-LCA). Natural Resources Forum, 36, 123-141.

[33]   Wiebe, K.S. (2016) The Impact of Renewable Energy Diffusion on European Consumption-Based Emissions. Economic Systems Research, 28, 1-18.

[34]   GroBmann, A., Lehr, U., Wiebe, K.S. and Wolter, M.I. (2013) Progress Report 5a-Modelling the Effects of the Energy Transition in Austria. Assessment of the Economic and Environmental Effects.

[35]   Sugawara, T. and Shibusawa, H. (2010) Evaluating the Economic Impacts of the Technological Innovation in the Motor Vehicle Industry: The Input-Output Approach. 50th European Congress of the Regional Science Association International, 19-23 August 2010, Jonkoping.

[36]   Barthel, K., Bohler-Baedecker, S., Bormann, R., Dispan, J., Fink, P., Koska, T., MeiBner, H.R. and Pronold, F. (2010) Zukunft der deutschen Automobilindustrie. WISO Diskurs, Dezember 2010, Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung, Bonn.

[37]   Hou, et al. (2006) A Study on the Technology Information Which Contributes the Comprehensive Economic, Energy and Environmental Analyses. The Institute of Energy Economics, Japan, 33-49. (In Japanese)

[38]   European Commission (2014) CO2 in Cars Regulation.

[39]   Ricardo-AEA (2013) Current and Future Lifecycle Emissions of Key ‘Low Carbon’ Technologies and Alternatives. Final Report for the Committee on Climate Change.

[40]   Hill, N., Brannigan, C., Smokers, R., Schroten, A., van Essen, H. and Skinner, I. (2012) Developing a Better Understanding of the Secondary Impacts and Key Sensitivities for the Decarbonisation of the EU’s Transport Sector by 2050.

[41]   IEA (2012) Energy Balances of OECD Countries 2009-2010. IEA, Paris.

[42]   Carbon Trust (2011a) International Carbon Flows—Aluminium (CTC790).