Received 5 December 2015; accepted 13 March 2016; published 16 March 2016
Iron oxide generally exists in different structures and forms with different useful applications ranging from geological to nanoscale technology; the most common however are α-Fe2O3 (hematite), γ-Fe2O3 (maghemite), Fe3O4 (magnetite) and Fe1−xO (wustite); the less commonly found are β- and ε-Fe2O3  . Maghemite has the same crystalline structure like Fe3O4 (magnetite). Main distinct features of maghemite are the presence of vacancies in Fe position with symmetry reduction. These basic polymorphs, the cubic bixbyite structure “beta” and orthorhombic structure “epsilon”, as well as nanoparticles of all forms, have been synthesized and extensively investigated in recent years  . Out of all these polymorphs, magehmite is the iron oxides currently most studied, which exhibits ferrimagnetic behavior below 1000 K due to the super exchange integrals competition between tetrahedral and octahedral sites and lately, it has found considerable uses in magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic recording media, fabrication of biocompatible magnetic fluids, and electrochromic devices   . Much focus has been given to it resulting in the modification in the growth, crystal structure, magnetic and electrical properties
However, a present review of the various synthesis methods available for maghemite nanoparticles growth shows co-precipitation, thermal decomposition, hydrothermal synthesis, microemulsion, sonochemical synthesis, and sonochemical as the most common methods; other methods such as electrochemical synthesis, laser pyrolysis techniques are not common  . Considering the present and the future prospect of maghemite crystals, it becomes highly needful to develop a simple, cheap and sustainable method for the synthesis of maghemite nanoparticles.
Metals are natural components of the environment including soil but they are of great concern when they are being added continuously. Nigeria as a country has a lot of iron mining and other allied iron processing companies. Unfortunately, only few of these companies have a standard way of disposing their waste iron scrap. This has a devastating effect on the environment with a long-term impact   . The aim of this study is to carry out an absorption study on Arsenic stock solution using synthesized maghemite from the iron scrap which has an absorbent.
2. Experiment Details
2.1. Preparation of Ferrous Precursor
Experiment was carried out according to Legodi et al. (2007)  . Iron scrap obtained from a factory dumpsite in Ogun state, Nigeria was grinded and sieved to obtain a fine iron particle. 60 g of this sieved iron water was digested with 300 ml of concentrated H2SO4 until a turbid solution was observed and further heated to dryness. This was used as a ferrous precursor.
2.2. Preparation of Maghemite from Ferrous Precursor
20 g of the ferrous precursor was added to 120 ml of deionized water. The mixture was stirred gently. A green precipitate solution of Fe2+ was formed and filtered off. 25% NH4OH, prepared by making up 25 ml of concentrated ammonia in a 100 ml standard flask with deionized water was added to the filtrate and allow to age for 20 hours and filtered before washing with deionized water. On drying, a crystalline, fine, black particle of magnetite was obtained. Finally, the magnetite obtained above was oven heated at 200˚C for two hours according to the equation below (Equation (2.2)). Maghemite particles, with a light brown coloration were obtained. The experiment was performed inside a glove box to prevent any possible oxygen contamination
2.3. Sorption Experiment
Two batches (A and B) of various standards, 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, and 1000 ppm of As(III) solution was prepared. Batch A was taken as the standard solutions with which the amount of As(III) sorbed were referenced 0.5 g of the maghemite particles synthesized was weighed into each concentration of the second batch and stirred vigorously in a mechanical stirrer until complete dispersion was observed. Atomic absorption spectrophotometry was used in determining the actual concentration of As(III) in both batches.
3. Result and Discussion
The concentration of As(III) in the stock after the absorption was also determine and the result is presented in Table 3. Using the Equation (3.1) below, the amount of As absorbed by the maghemite sample can be evaluated. The amount Qsorbed, is also tabulated below:
Table 1. Absorbance of As(III) obtained with different concentration (Batch A).
Table 2. Absorbance of As(III) obtained with different concentration + maghemite (Batch B).
Table 3. Amount of As(III) sorbed (mg/g) at different concentration.
where Qsorbed is the amount of maghemite iron adsorbed, v is the volume of the stock solution taken for analysis, Ci is the initial concentration of the As(III), Cf is the final concentration of the As(III) after the absorption and m is the mass of the maghemite sample used for the absorbtion experiment (Table 3).
A plot of Qsorbed (mg/g) against concentration of arsenic (ppm) (see Figure 1) was used to determine the linear absorption of the maghmite samples. It could be seen that Qsorbed is directly proportional to the concentration of standard implying that more heavy metals such As, Cr, Hg, Pb, etc. could be easily removed with the method. Such heavy metals are found to be inherently laden in companies discharged waste and other heavy industrial waste dump. This technology can be improved to treat discharge waste of heavy metal and make them environmentally friendly.
Mass of iron waste used 60 g
Mass of ferrous Precursors obtained after digestion 70 g
Residue obtained after washing with excess water and filtering 50.22 g
This implies that Mass of Fe3+ that’s dissolved 70 g - 50.55 g 19.78 g
Mass of Magnetite obtained after drying 9.02 g
From the equation of reaction (2.1 above),
3 moles of Fe3+ (168 g/mol) 2 moles of Fe3O4 (233 g/mol)
⟹ Number of moles of Fe3O4 produced = [(19.78 g ´ 3 mol)/168 g∙mol−1]/3 mol
⟹ Experimentally, 0.118 mole of Fe3O4was obtained
⟹ 27.376g (Molar mass of Fe3O4 ⟹ 232 g∙mol−1)
Percentage yield of Fe3O4 = ⟹ 32.96%
One mole Fe3O4 (232 g/mol−1) ⟹ one mole of (160 g∙mol−1) γ-Fe2O3
⟹ 9.02 g of Fe3O4 ⟹ [9.02 g ´ 160 g∙mol−1]/232 g∙mol−1 ⟹ 6.220 g
Percentage of γ-Fe2O3 ⟹ ⟹ 68.95%
Figure 1. Graph of Qsorbed (mg/g) against concentration (ppm).
It has been shown that maghemite can be successfully synthesized from waste iron by transforming the magnetite obtained from the ferrous precursor. Sorption experiment proved maghemite to be a good absorbent for As(III). Other heavy metals such as Cr, Pb, etc. were however not studied. The absorption was low at lower concentration (10, 20, 30, 40, 50 ppm). More As(III) were sorbed at higher concentration. Experimental yield obtained for mghmite finally synthesized was low (32%). We believe that this can be improved with more studies. Heavy metals present in most water, waste and other environmental surfaces can be successfully removed at a low cost and pollution reduction.
 Chirita, M. and Grozescu, I. (2009) Fe2O3-Nanoparticles, Physical Properties and Their Photochemical and Photo-electrochemical Applications. Scientific Bulletin of “Politehnica” University of Timisoara, 54, 1.
 Wu, W., He, Q.G. and Jiang, C.Z. (2008) Magnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticles: Synthesis and Surface Functionalization Strategies. Nanoscale Research Letters, 3, 397-415.
 Abdus-Salam, N. (2009) Assessment of Heavy Metals Pollution in Dumpsites in Ilorin Metropolis. Ethiopian Journal of Environmental Studies and Management (EJESM), 2, 92-99.
 Okeyode, I.C. and Rufai, A.A. (2002) Determination of Elemental Composition of Soil Samples from Some Selected Dumpsites in Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria, Using Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer. International Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences, 2, 55-70.
 Legodi, M.A. and de Waal, D. (2006) The Preparation of Magnetite, Goethite, Hematite and Maghemite of Pigment Quality from Mill Scale Iron Waste. Dyes and Pigments, 74, 161-168.