Back
 BLR  Vol.7 No.1 , March 2016
Piercing the Veil of Public Policy in the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign-Related Awards in China
Abstract: This paper analyzed the recognition and enforcement of foreign-related awards in relation to public policy issues from an empirical perspective. The conception of “public policy” in China is vague in the legislative level so this paper conducted holistic summary and analysis of relevant cases in Chinese courts to gradually pierce the veil of public policy.
Cite this paper: Chen, H. , Bao, H. and Zhang, T. (2016) Piercing the Veil of Public Policy in the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign-Related Awards in China. Beijing Law Review, 7, 23-32. doi: 10.4236/blr.2016.71003.
References

[1]   Grierson, J. (2009). Court Review of Awards on Public Policy Grounds: A Recent Decision of the English Commercial Court Throws Light on the Position under the English Arbitration Act 1996. MEALEY’S International Arbitration Report, 24, 1-9.

[2]   Hunter, M., & Silva, G. C. E. (2003). Transnational Public Policy and its Application in Investment Arbitrations. The Journal of World Investment & Trade, 4, vii-378.

[3]   Mehren (1981). Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments-General Theory and the Role of Jurisdictional Requirements. RECUEIL DES COURS: COLLECTED COURSES OF THE HAGUE ACADEMY OF INTERNATIONAL LAW 1980, Issue II, vii-47.

[4]   Mehren, & Patterson (1974). Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign-Country Judgments in the United States. LAW & POL'Y INT'L Bus, No. 6, vii-37, 61.

[5]   Redfern, A., & Hunter, M. (2004). Law and Practice of International Commercial Arbitration (4th ed.: Volume 421). London: Sweet & Maxwell.

[6]   Reed, L. F., & Freda, J. (2008). Narrow Exceptions: A Review of Recent U.S. Precedent Regarding the Due Process and Public Policy Defenses of the New York Convention. Journal of International Arbitration, 25, 649-656.

[7]   Steiner, S. B., & Várady, T. (2012). Public Policy as Ground for Refusal of Recognition of Foreign Arbitral Awards with Special Focus on Austria and Hungary. Budapest: CEU, Budapest College.

[8]   Wan, E. X. (2009). Judicial Practice with regard to the New York Convention in China. Journal of Law Application, No. 5, vii-276(2).

[9]   Wan, E. X. (Ed.) (2009). China Trial Guide: Guide on Foreign-Related Commercial and Maritime Trial, Vol. 18, vii-143-150.

 
 
Top