Back
 IJMPCERO  Vol.5 No.1 , February 2016
Effect of Cut-Off Frequency of Butterworth Filter on Detectability and Contrast of Hot and Cold Regions in Tc-99m SPECT
Abstract: In SPECT, noise is one of the major limitations that degrade image quality. To suppress the noisy signals in an image, digital filters are most commonly applied. However, in SPECT image reconstruction, selection of an appropriate filter and its functions has always remained a difficult task. In this work an attempt was made to investigate the effects of varying cut-off frequencies and in keeping the order of Butterworth filter constant on detectability and contrast of hot and cold re-gions images. A new insert simulating hot and cold regions which provides similar views in a reconstructed image was placed in the phantom’s cylindrical source tank and imaged. Tc-99m radionuclide was distributed uniformly in the phantom. SPECT data were collected in a 20% energy window centered at 140 keV by a Philips ADAC Forte dual head gamma camera mounted with a LEHR collimator. Images were generated by using the filtered backprojection technique. A Butterworth filter of order 5 with cut-off frequencies 0.35 and 0.45 cycles·cm-1 was applied. Images were examined in terms of hot and cold regions, detectability and contrast. Results show that the hot and cold regions’ detectability and contrast vary with the change of cut-off frequency. With a 0.45 cycles·cm-1 cut-off frequency, a significant enhancement in contrast of cold regions was achieved as compared to a 0.35 cycles·cm-1 cut-off frequency. Furthermore, the detectability of hot and cold regions improved with the use of a 0.45 cycles·cm-1 cut-off frequency. In conclusion, image quality of hot and cold regions affected in a different way with a change of cut-off frequency. Thus, care should be taken in selecting the filter cut-off frequency prior to reconstruction of images; particularly, when both types of regions are expected in the reconstructed image.
Cite this paper: Sayed, I. and Mohamed Nasrudin, N. (2016) Effect of Cut-Off Frequency of Butterworth Filter on Detectability and Contrast of Hot and Cold Regions in Tc-99m SPECT. International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, 5, 100-109. doi: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2016.51011.
References

[1]   Tusi, B.M.W. (1996) The AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorials for Resident. Radiographics, 16, 173-183.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.16.1.173

[2]   van Laere, K., Koole, M., Lemahieu, I. and Dierckx, R. (2001) Image Filtering in Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography: Principles and Applications. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, 25, 127-133.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0895-6111(00)00063-X

[3]   Heller, G.V., Mann, A. and Hendel, R.C. (2009) Nuclear Cardiology: Technical Applications. McGraw-Hill, New York.

[4]   Sadremomtaz, A. and Taherparvar, P. (2013) The Influence of Filters on the SPECT Image of Carlson Phantom. Journal of Biomedical Science and Engineering, 6, 291-297.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/jbise.2013.63037

[5]   Lyra, M., Ploussi, A., Rouchota, M. and Synefia, S. (2014) Filters in 2D and 3D Cardiac SPECT Image Processing. International Journal of Biomedical Imaging, 2014, Article ID: 963264.

[6]   Lyra, M. and Ploussi, A. (2011) Filtering in SPECT Image Reconstruction. International Journal of Biomedical Imaging, 2011, Article ID: 693795.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/693795

[7]   Pandey, A.K., Pant, G.S. and Malhotra, A. (2004) Standardization of SPECT Filter Parameters. Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 19, 30-35.

[8]   Christian, P.E., Bernier, D.R. and Langan, J.K. (2003) Nuclear Medicine and PET: Technology and Techniques. 5th Edition, Elsevier, Mosby.

[9]   Miller, T.R. and Sampathkumaran, K.S. (1982) Digital Filtering in Nuclear Medicine. Indian Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 23, 66-72.

[10]   Reijo, T., Heli, H., Heimo, I. and Antti, S. (2015) Adaptive Autoregressive Model for Reduction of Noise in SPECT. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2015, Article ID: 494691.

[11]   Salar, S., Alireza, K.A., Mohammad, R.A., Mohammad, H.F. and Arman, R. (2013) A Novel Non-Linear Recursive Filter Design for Extracting High Rate Pulse Features in Nuclear Medicine Imaging and Spectroscopy. Medical Engineering & Physics, 35, 754-764.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.08.003

[12]   Duarte, D.D., Monteiro, M.S., El Hakmaoui, F., Prior, J.O., Vierira, L. and Pires-Jorge, J. (2012) Influence of Reconstruction Parameters during Filtered Backprojection and Ordered-Subset Expectation Maximization in the Measurement of the Left-Ventricular Volumes and Function during Gated SPECT. Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology, 40, 29-36.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2967/jnmt.111.094599

[13]   Sayed, I.S. and Shah, A.A. (2007) Modified PET/SPECT Cylindrical Phantom. IFMBE Proceedings of the World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, WC2006, Seoul, 27 August-1 September 2006, 1681-1683.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-36841-0_414

[14]   Zeniya, T., Watabe, H., Aoi, T., Kyeong, M., Teramoto, N., Hayashi, T., Sohlberg, A., Kudo, H. and Iida, H. (2004) A New Reconstruction Strategy for Image Improvement in Pinhole SPECT. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 31, 1166-1172.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00259-004-1510-4

[15]   Sayed, I.S. and Aima, H.H. (2011) Evaluation of the Effect of Chang’s Attenuation Correction Technique on Similar Transverse Views of Cold and Hot Regions in Tc-99m SPECT: A Phantom Study. IFMBE Proceedings of 5th Kuala Lumpur International Conference on Biomedical Engineering, BIOMED 2011, Kuala Lumpur, 20-23 June 2011, 643-649.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21729-6_158

[16]   Rasband, W.S. (1997-2015) ImageJ. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij

[17]   Onishi, H., Matsutake, Y., Matsutomo, N. and Amijima, H. (2010) Validation of Optimal Cut-Off Frequency Using a Butterworth Filter in Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Reconstruction for the Target Organ: Spatial Domain and Frequency Domain. Humanity and Science: Journal of the Faculty of Health and Welfare, Prefectural University of Hiroshima, 10, 27-36.

[18]   Takavar, A., Shamsipour, G., Sohrabi, M. and Eftekhari, M. (2004) Determination of Optimum Filter in Myocardial SPECT: A Phantom Study. International Journal of Radiation Research, 4, 205-210.

[19]   Lima, A.L.S., de Jesus, M.C., dos Santos, J.A. and Megueriam, B.A. (2007) Influence of Digital Filters Used to Obtain Cerebral Image in Nuclear Medicine. Proceeding of International Nuclear Atlantic Conference—INAC 2007, Santos, 30 September-5 October 2007, 5.
https://www.ipen.br/biblioteca/cd/inac/2007/pdf_dvd/E05_1221.pdf

 
 
Top