Back
 IJMPCERO  Vol.5 No.1 , February 2016
Investigation and Application of High Megavoltage X-Ray Imaging Mode in Radiotherapy
Abstract: After drawbacks and shortages of using conventional kV or MV imaging mode were analyzed, this study proposes a new position verification mode with using the energy larger than 15 MeV or nominal accelerating potential greater than 25 MV X-Ray. The new position verification mode is named HMV imaging mode. Along with the comparison of theoretical analyses, phantom experiments and clinical results to the original imaging modes, this report is going to demonstrate the HMV imaging mode is superior to traditional kV and MV imaging modes. This report first theoretically analyzed three main effects of X-ray interacting with medium by numerous equations and compared their mass attenuation coefficient with different types of tissue. X-ray irradiated on a “Catphan 500” cylinder phantom with different energies to verify these theoretical results. Furthermore, based on phantom experiments’ results, we have done numerous clinical trials and comparisons with patient’s clinical results. The theoretical and experimental results illustrate that the scanned images from HMV mode have a good quality and have ability to identify different tissue components clearly. HMV imaging mode overcomes drawbacks of position verification from both kV and MV level imaging mode as well as keeping advantages of kV and MV imaging mode. The result indicates that HMV is a good position verification mode in radiotherapy.
Cite this paper: Zhang, Q. , Wang, X. , Sun, Q. , Jin, Y. , Li, Y. , Li, Z. , Sun, T. and Wang, L. (2016) Investigation and Application of High Megavoltage X-Ray Imaging Mode in Radiotherapy. International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, 5, 42-50. doi: 10.4236/ijmpcero.2016.51005.
References

[1]   Hurkmans, C.W., Cho, B.C., Damen, E., Zijp, L. and Mijnheer, B.J. (2002) Reduction of Cardiac and Lung Complication Probabilities after Breast Irradiating Using Conformal Radiotherapy with or without Intensity Modulation. Radiation Oncology, 22, 163-171.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(01)00473-X

[2]   Jacob, R., Hanlon, A.L., Horwitz, E.M., Movsas, B., Uzzo, R.G. and Pollack, A. (2004) The Relationship of Increasing Radiotherapy Dose to Reduced Distant Metastases and Mortality in Men with Prostate Cancer. Cancer, 100, 538-543.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11927

[3]   Chen, J., Morin, O., Aubin, M., Bucci, M.K., Chuang, C.F. and Pouliot, J. (2006) Dose Guided Radiation Therapy with Megavoltage Cone Beam CT. The British Journal of Radiology, 79, S87-S98.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1259/bjr/60612178

[4]   Jaffray, D.A., Siewerdsen, J.H., Wong, J.W. and Martinez, A.A. (2002) Flat Panel Cone-Beam Computed Tomography for Imaging Guided Radiation Therapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 53, 1337-1449.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02884-5

[5]   Pouliot, J., Bani-Hashemi, A., Chen, J., Svators, M., Ghelmansarai, F., Mitschke, M. and Xia, P. (2005) Low-Dose Megavoltage Cone-Beam CT for Radiation Therapy. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, 61, 552-560.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.10.011

[6]   Groh, B.A., Siewerdsen, J.H. and Drakea, D.G. (2002) A Performance Comparison of Flat-Panel Imager-Based MV and kV Cone-Beam CT. Medical Physics, 29, 967-975.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.1477234

[7]   Ruchala, K.J., Olivera, G.H., Schloesser, E.A. and Mackie, T.R. (1999) Megavoltage CT on a Tomotherapy System. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 44, 2597-2621.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/44/10/316

[8]   (2015) Personal Conversation with Experts at the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM).

[9]   Murphy, M.J., Balter, J., Balter, S., Bencomo, J.A., Das, I.J., Jiang, S.B., Ma, C.M., Olivera, G.H., Rodebaugh, R.F., Shirato, H. and Yin, F.F. (2007) The Management of Imaging Dose during Image-Guided Radiotherapy: Report of the AAPM Task Group 75. Medical Physics, 34, 4041-4060.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.2775667

[10]   Liu, L., Antonuk, L.E., EI-Mohri, Y., Zhao, Q.H. and Jiang, H. (2015) Theoretical Investigation of the Design and Performance of a Dual Energy (kV and MV) Radiotherapy Imager. Medical Physics, 42, 2072-2084.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1118/1.4915120

[11]   Thilmann, C., Nill, S., Tucking, T., Hoss, A., Hesse, B., Dietrich, L., Bendl, R., Rhein, B., Haäring, P., Thieke, C., Oelfke, U., Debus, J. and Huber, P. (2006) Correction of Patient Positioning Errors Based on In-Line Cone Beam CTs: Clinical Implementation and First Experiences. Radiation Oncology, 24, 1-16.

[12]   Podgorsak, E.B. (2005) Radiation Oncology Physics: A Handbook for Teachers and Students. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.

[13]   Hu, Y.M. (1999) The Tumor Radiation Physics. Atomic Energy Pressed, Beijing.

[14]   Zhang, Q.S., Zhang, M. and Wu, X.Y. (2005) Research on Radiation Quality and Scanning Beam Characteristics of Medical Electron Cyclotron. Chinese Journal of Medical Physics, 22, 376-378.

[15]   Guan, H.Q. and Dong, H. (2009) Dose Calculation Accuracy Using Cone-Beam CT for Pelvic Adaptive Radiotherapy. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 54, 6239-6250.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/54/20/013

 
 
Top