Clinton C. Shock^1*, André B. Pereira², Erik B. G. Feibert³, Cedric A. Shock⁴, Ali Ibrahim Akin⁵, Levent Abdullah Unlenen⁶

Show more
¹ Malheur Experiment Station, Oregon State University, Ontario, USA.
² Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Engineering, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Brazil.
³ Oregon State University, Malheur Experiment Station, Ontario, USA.
⁴ Oregon State University, Malheur Experiment Station, Ontario, USA.
⁵ Ankara Nuclear Agriculture and Animal Research Center, Ankara, Turkey.
⁶ General Directorate of Agricultural Researches, Potato Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Nigde, Turkey.
Show less

Abstract: The efficient use of irrigation water requires several kinds of information. One element of efficient irrigation scheduling is monitoring the soil moisture to assure that the crop irrigation goals are being met. Various soil moisture sensing devices were tested for irrigation scheduling in silt loam at the Malheur Agricultural Experiment Station, Oregon State University between 2001 and 2004. Neutron probes, frequency domain probes, tensiometers, granular matrix sensors, and Irrigas were compared as to their performance under field conditions at Ontario, Oregon, USA. Granular matrix sensors were tested as read automatically by a datalogger and read manually with a hand-held meter. Practical suggestions are provided to use soil moisture sensors to the benefit of crop production and water conservation.

Keywords: Soil Water, Irrigation Scheduling, Responsiveness, Soil Moisture Sensor, Porous Ceramic

Cite this paper: Shock, C. , Pereira, A. , Feibert, E. , Shock, C. , Akin, A. and Unlenen, L. (2016) Field Comparison of Soil Moisture Sensing Using Neutron Thermalization, Frequency Domain, Tensiometer, and Granular Matrix Sensor Devices: Relevance to Precision Irrigation. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 8, 154-167. doi: 10.4236/jwarp.2016.82013.

References

[1]   Charlesworth P. and Stirzaker, R.J. (2003) Irrigation Scheduling by Soil Water Status. In: Stewart, B.A. and Howell, T.A., Eds., Encyclopedia of Water Science, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 528-531.

[2]   Eldredge, E.P., Holmes, Z.A., Mosley, A.R., Shock, C.C. and Stieber, T.D. (1996) Effects of Transitory Water Stress on Potato Tuber Stem-End Reducing Sugar and Fry Color. American Potato Journal, 73, 517-530.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02851697

[3]   Shock, C.C., Feibert, E.B.G. and Saunders, L.D. (1998) Onion Yield and Quality Affected by Soil Water Potential as Irrigation Threshold. HortScience, 33, 1188-1191.

[4]   Shock, C.C., Feibert, E.B.G. and Saunders, L.D. (2000) Irrigation Criteria for Drip-Irrigated Onions. HortScience, 35, 63-66.

[5]   Shock, C.C., Feibert, E.B.G., Seddigh, M. and Saunders, L.D. (2002) Water Requirements and Growth of Irrigated Hybrid Poplar in a Semi-Arid Environment in Eastern Oregon. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 17, 46-53.

[6]   Shock, C.C. and Feibert, E.B.G. (2002) Deficit Irrigation of Potato. In: Moutonnet, P., Ed., Deficit Irrigation Practices, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Water Reports 22, 47-55.
http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/Y3655E/Y3655E00.htm

[7]   Shock, C.C. and Wang F.-X. (2011) Soil Water Tension, a Powerful Measurement for Productivity and Stewardship. HortScience, 46, 178-185.

[8]   Evett, S.R. (2003) Measuring Soil Water by Neutron Thermalization. In: Stewart, B.A. and Howell, T.A., Eds., Encyclopedia of Water Science, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 889-893.

[9]   Evett, S.R., Laurent, J.P. Cepuder, P. and Hignett, C. (2002) Neutron Scattering, Capacitance, and TDR Soil Water Content Measurements Compared on Four Continents. 17th World Congress of Soil Science, 14-21 August 2002, Bangkok, 1021-1. (CD-ROM)

[10]   Evett, S.R. and Steiner, J.L. (1995) Precision of Neutron Scattering and Capacitance Moisture Gauges Based on Field Calibration. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 59, 961-968.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1995.03615995005900040001x

[11]   Hubbell, J.M. and Sisson, J. (2003) Soil Water Potential Measurement by Tensiometers. In: Stewart, B.A. and Howell, T.A., Eds., The Encyclopedia of Water Science, Marcel Dekker, New York, 904-907.

[12]   Shock, C.C. (2003) Soil Water Potential Measurement by Granular Matrix Sensors. In: Stewart, B.A. and Howell, T.A., Eds., The Encyclopedia of Water Science, Marcel Dekker, New York, 899-903.

[13]   Kemper, W.D. and Amemiya, M. (1958) Utilization of Air Permeability of Porous Ceramics a Measure of Hydraulic Stress in Soils. Soil Science, 85, 117-124.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00010694-195803000-00001

[14]   Wright, J.L. (1982) New Evapotranspiration Crop Coefficients. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Division, ASCE, 108, 57-74.

[15]   Shock, C.C., Barnum, J.M. and Seddigh, M. (1998) Calibration of Watermark Soil Moisture Sensors for Irrigation Management. In: Proceedings of the International Irrigation Show, Irrigation Association, San Diego, 139-146.

[16]   Shock, C.C., Corn, A., Jaderholm, S., Jensen, L.B., and Shock, C.A. (2001) Evaluation of the AM400 Soil Moisture Datalogger to Aid Irrigation Scheduling. In Proceedings of the International Irrigation Show, Irrigation Association, San Diego, 111-116.

[17]   Hintze, J.L. (2000) NCSS 97 Statistical System for Windows, Number Cruncher Statistical Systems, Kaysville, Utah.

[18]   Shock, C.C. Feibert, E.B.G., Saunders, L.D. and Eldredge, E.P. (2002) Automation of Subsurface Drip Irrigation for Crop Research. World Congress on Computers in Agriculture and Natural Resources, American Society of Agricultural Engineers, Iguacu Falls, 809-816.