Received 17 November 2015; accepted 20 January 2016; published 25 January 2016
Conservation of physical quantities such as energy, linear and angular momenta in classical and quantum collisions is an important tool to find the other physical quantities of the collision systems. But the conservation of the canonical angular momentum has not been studied in detail. In a recent study Saglam and Sahin  calculated the intrinsic quantum flux of gamma photons by using the conservation of the canonical angular momentum and showed that depending on its helicity, a gamma photon carried an intrinsic quantum flux of along the propagation direction. Here the (+) and (−) signs stand for the right hand and left hand circular helicity respectively. In the present study we calculate the spin dependent canonical angular momenta of a free electron, positron and gamma photons. We first show that for any particle with the charge q the canonical angular momentum has two parts: the kinetic angular momentum term and the intrinsic flux dependent terms. In terms of the z-components we write:. The difference between and is due to the presence of the intrinsic magnetic field and hence the intrinsic quantum flux, , which has already been calculated   . For a free electron and a positron, depending on the spin orientations, spin-up () or spin-down (¯), we have:;;; respectively. Similarly for a gamma photon, propagating in z direction with an angular frequency ω, we have along the propagation direction. Here the (+) and (-) signs stand for the and circular helicity respectively. The canonical angular momentum is always represented by and its eigenvalues are. Therefore the spectrum of kinetic angular momentum operator consists of times an integer number m shifted by. In the present study the sources of these intrinsic flux and hence the magnetic fields are due to the magnetic moments of these particles.
When we do the Stern-Gerlach experiment (SGE) with these particles the magnetic field gradient in the Stern- Gerlach device serves as a detector for the particle’s magnetic moment vector: If the non-uniformity of the magnetic field is along the z direction such as, then because of the torque on these particles, the magnetic moment vector can have z-component only: (where or). On
the other hand the potential energy produces a force of which has quantized values as μz. Depending on whether or, the particles are deflected upward or downward. For example, in the SGE with electron, the electron
beam is deflected into two sub-beams which mean that μz takes only two possible quantized values which are equal to where μB is the Bohr magneton. Because of the negative charge of the electron, the relation between spin and the magnetic moment was set as where g is the Lande-g factor which is equal to 2 for a free electron and is the spin angular momentum vector. So in the SGE with electron, the z component of spin takes only two possible values which are:. Therefore if then the spin-down electrons will be deflected upward while the spin-up ones will be deflected downward. Similarly if we have SGE with a positron beam, because of the positive charge, the spin-down positrons will be deflected downward while the spin-up ones will be deflected upward. But when it comes to the gamma photons, which are the composite particles made up of an electron and a positron, the direction of the deflection is determined by the sign of the Σμz. Therefore the magnetic moment of the gamma photon is an important property (not spin) to determine the direction of the deflection. Recently we have calculated  the magnetic moment of a gamma photon and found that the z-component of the magnetic moment is equal to
where ω is the angular frequency of photon. Here the (+) and (−) signs correspond to and circular helicity respectively.
2. Canonical Angular Momentum of a Free Electron and a Positron
The definition of the canonical angular momentum vector, , for a free particle with charge q and the position vector is given by  :
which is put in the form:
where is the kinetic angular momentum and is the intrinsic quantum flux of the particle.
For a free electron (e−) and a positron (e+) we will have only the spin contribution to the kinetic angular momentum. Therefore for spin-up () and spin-down (¯) directions we write:
respectively. Here is the spin angular momentum vector. For a free electron and a positron corresponding intrinsic flux for spin-up () and spin-down (¯) directions are given by  :
Substituting and (3a)-(4b) in (2) we find the z-components of the canonical angular momenta of a free electron (e−) and a free positron (e+) for spin-up (↑) and spin-down (↓) directions:
3. Canonical Angular Momenta of Gamma Photons
To calculate the canonical angular momentum of a gamma photon (g) our starting point will be the electron-po- sitron annihilation process ending with the creation of two gamma photons with and circular helicities  . We will assume that electron and positron collide at the origin of the coordinate system. After the collision we will have two photons with the same energy:
but with different helicities and circular helicities. Here is the rest mass energy of both and and ηω is the energy of each gamma photon created with the same angular frequency. Following Saglam and Sahin  , we use Dirac notations to represent the wave functions of two gamma photons with and circular helicities:
For a gamma photon propagating in z direction with the wave vector momentum relation given in (2) becomes:
Next we calculate the expectation values of spin and the the intrinsic flux for gamma photons with and circular helicities: In Appendix, we show that for both helicities the expectation values of are
zero. We also show that for a gamma (g) photon, propagating in z direction, we have Φint(γ) = ±Φ0 along the propagation direction. Here the (+) and (−) signs stand for with and circular helicity respectively. Now using the current-loop model   for gamma photons, we can assume that the above intrinsic flux Φint(γ) are caused by the fictitious point charge (qfic = e) rotating in the helical sense with or with the angular frequencyω and moving in z direction with the velocity of light. Further in the current loop model it is also proved that the z-component of the magnetic field is uniform throughout the loop  . Substituting
, , and in (8) we find the canonical angular momenta of gamma (g) photons with and circular helicities:
We have calculated the canonical angular momentum of a free electron, positron and gamma photon. We show that for any particle with charge q the canonical angular momentum is written as the summation of the kinetic angular momentum and the intrinsic quantum flux dependent terms. In terms of the z-
components, we show that:. For a free electron and a positron, depending on the spin orientation, we find that:; and respectively. Similarly for a gamma (g) photon, propagating in z direction with an angular frequency ω, the canonical angular momentum is found to be:. Here the (+) and (−) signs stand
for the right and left hand circular helicity respectively. The present result will help for a better understanding of the photonic transitions in atoms, nano-structures and so on. A more detailed study will be presented in the future.
Appendix: Calculation of the Expectation Values of and for Gamma Photons
To calculate of the expectation values of of and for gamma photons our starting point will be Dirac representation given in (7) of the wave functions of two gamma photons with and circular helicities:;. We first write the normalization conditions as follows:
where dV1 and dV2 are the volume elements for electron and positron respectively.
The expectation values of the total z-components of the spin for the eigenstates φ(rh) and φ(lh) are:
With a similar treatment we calculate the expectation values of the total intrinsic flux for the eigenstates φ(rh) and φ(lh) are:
 Saglam, M. and Sahin, G. (2009) International Journal of Modern Physics B, 23, 4977-4985.
 Saglam, M. and Boyacioglu, B. (2002) International Journal of Modern Physics B, 16, 607-614.
 Saglam, Z. and Sahin, G. (2015) Journal of Modern Physics, 6, 937-947.
 Saglam, M. (2002) Is Electron an Anyon with Spin 1/2?