WJCMP  Vol.6 No.1 , February 2016
On the Real Einstein Beauty E = Kmc2
Abstract: The paper suggests that E = mc2 may be open to misinterpretation and that in this form it is not what Einstein advanced first. It is further suggested to return to the slightly less compact formula E = Kmc2 where a < K < 1 which has the merit of accounting for the measured ordinary energy density of the cosmos (K = 1/22) and the conjectured missing dark energy density of the universe (K = 21/22) from the view point of economical notation.
Cite this paper: Babchin, A. and Naschie, M. (2016) On the Real Einstein Beauty E = Kmc2. World Journal of Condensed Matter Physics, 6, 1-6. doi: 10.4236/wjcmp.2016.61001.

[1]   Babchin, A.J. (2015) Does the Formula E = mc^2 Belong to Einstein? Research Gate Questions and Answers.

[2]   Okun. L.B. (2008) The Einstein Formula Eo = mc2. Isn’t the Lord Laughing? Physics-Uspekhi, 51, 513-527.

[3]   Schwartz, H.M. (1977) Einstein’s First Paper on Relativity. American Journal of Physics, 45, 18-25.

[4]   Panos, P. (2008) The Mass Energy Relation of Einstein = mc2 Is Not Generally Valid.

[5]   Alekseevich, U.N. (1950) Izbrannyyeesochineniya. M. 1, 1873.

[6]   El Naschie, M.S. (2014) From E = mc2 to E = mc2/22—A Short Account of the Most Famous Equation in Physics and Its Hidden Quantum Entangled Origin. Journal of Quantum Information Science, 4, 284-291.

[7]   Rindler, W. (2006) Relativity (Special, General and Cosmological). Oxford University Press, Oxford.

[8]   El Naschie, M.S. (2015) An Exact Mathematical Picture of Quantum Spacetime. Advances in Pure Mathematics, 5, 560-570.

[9]   El Naschie, M.S. (2015) If Quantum “Wave” of the Universe Then Quantum “Particle” of the Universe: A Resolution of the Dark Energy Question and the Black Hole Information Paradox. International Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics, 5, 243-247.

[10]   Einstein, A. (1905) Ist die Trägheit eines Körpers von seinem Energieinhalt abhängig? (German) [Does the Inertia of a Body Depend on Its Energy Content?]. Annalen der Physik, 323, 639-641. (English Translations in [4, 67-71]).

[11]   Einstein, A. (1905) Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Körper. (German) [On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies]. Annalen der Physik, 322, 891-921. (English Translations in [4, 35-36 and 7]).

[12]   Lorentz, H.A., Einstein, A., Minkowski, H. and Weyl, H. (1952) The Principle of Relativity: A Collection of Original Memoirs on the Special and General Theory of Relativity. With Notes by A. Sommerfeld. Translated by W. Perrett and G.B. Jeffery. Dover Publications, Inc., New York.

[13]   El Naschie, M.S. (2014) The Measure Concentration of Convex Geometry in a Quasi Banach Spacetime behind the Supposedly Missing Dark Energy of the Cosmos. American Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics, 2, 72-77.

[14]   Wesson, P.S. (2006) Five-Dimensional Physics. World Scientific, Singapore.

[15]   El Naschie, M.S. (2015) The Counterintuitive Increase of Information Due to Extra Spacetime Dimensions of a Black Hole and Dvoretzky’s Theorem. Natural Science, 7, 483-487.

[16]   El Naschie, M.S. (2015) Application of Dvoretzky’s Theorem of Measure Concentration in Physics and Cosmology. Open Journal of Microphysics, 5, 11-15.

[17]   El Naschie, M.S. (2015) A Resolution of the Black Hole Information Paradox via Transfinite Set Theory. World Journal of Condensed Matter Physics, 5, 249-260.

[18]   El Naschie, M.S. (2015) Casimir-Dark Energy Nano Reactor Design Proposal Based on Fractals. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics, 3, 187-194.

[19]   Marek-Crnjac, L. (2015) On El Naschie’s Fractal Cantorian Spacetime and Dark Energy—A Tutorial Review. Natural Science, 7, 581-598.