[1] Amari, E. (1857). Critica di una scienza delle legislazioni comparate (A Critiqueof a Science of Comparative Legislation), Vol. I-II. Genoa: R.I. de’ Sordomuti, repr. (1969). Palermo: Edizioni della Regione siciliana, 139.
[2] Bognetti, G. (1994). Introduzione al diritto costituzionale comparato. Il metodo (p. 26). (Introduction to Comparative Constitutional Law: The Method). Turin: Giappichelli.
[3] Constantinesco, L. J. (1972). Die rechtsvergleichende Methode (p. 82). (Comparative Law: Comparative Method). Koln: Karl Heymanns.
[4] Croce, B. (1943). Teoria e storia della storiografia (5th ed., p. 12). (Theory and History of Historiography). Bari: Laterza.
[5] Esmein, A. (1899). éléments de droit constitutionnel francais et comparé (Elements of Frenchand Comparative Constitutional Law), repr. (2001). Paris: éditions Panthéon-Assas.
[6] Esquirol, J. L. (2001). René David: At the Head of the Legal Family. In A. Riles, Ed., Rethinking the Masters of Comparative Law (p. 234). Oxford and Portland OR: Hart.
[7] Franklin, J. H. (1977). Jean Bodin and the Sixtenth-Century Revolution in the Methodology of Law and History (2nd ed., p. 116). New York: Columbia University Press.
[8] Friedman, L. H. (1973). History of American Law (p. 98). New York: Simon & Schuster.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/845101
[9] Gerber, D. J. (2001). Sculpting the Agenda of Comparative Law: Ernst Rabel and the Facade of Language. In A. Riles (Ed.), Rethinking the Masters of Comparative Law (p. 190). Oxford and Portland OR: Hart.
[10] Gilmore, G. (1977). The Ages of American Law (p. 10). New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
[11] Gorla, G. (1964). Diritto comparato [Comparative Law]. In Enciclopedia del Diritto [Encyclopedia of Law] (Vol. XII, p. 930, nt. 5). Milan: Giuffrè.
[12] Gutteridge, H. C. (1949). Comparative Law. An Introduction to the Comparative Method of Legal Study and Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[13] Hazeltine, H. D. (1910). Selden as Legal Historian. Harvard Law Review, 24, 105-118.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1324818
[14] Hirschl, R. (2009). Montesquieu and the Renaissance of Comparative Constitutional Law. In R. E. Kingston (Ed.), Montesquieu and His Legacy (pp. 199-220). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
[15] Hug, W. (1932). The History of Comparative Law. Harvard Law Review, 45, 1027-1070.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1332143
[16] Husa, J. (2015). A New Introduction to Comparative Law (p. 104). Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart.
[17] Launay, R. (2001). Montesquieu: The Specter of Despotism and the Origins of Comparative Law. In A. Riles (Ed.), Rethinking the Masters of Comparative Law (pp. 22-38). Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart.
[18] Le Goff, J. (1979). Les intellectuels au Moyen Age [Intellectuals in the Middle Ages] (p. 70). Paris: Seuil.
[19] Lupoi, M. (2001). Sistemi giuridici comparati. Traccia per un corso [Comparative Legal Systems: Course Tracks] (p. 15). Rome: Istituto Poligraficodello Stato.
[20] Maine, H. S. (1861). Ancient Law: Its Connection with the Early History of Society, and Its Relations to Modern Ideas (p. 2). Repr. 1982, Birmingham, AL: The Legal Classic Library.
[21] Maitland, F. W. (1908). The Constitutional History of England: A Course of Lectures (p. 198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[22] Maitland, F. W. (1911). Why the History of English Law Is Not Written. In H. A. L. Fisher (Ed.), The Collected Papers of Frederic William Maitland (Vol. 1, p. 488). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[23] Markesinis, B. (2003). Comparative Law in the Courtroom and the Classroom: The Story of the Last Thirty-Five Years (pp. 62). Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart.
[24] Mattei, U. (2011). The Comparative Jurisprudence of Schlesinger and Sacco: A Study in Legal Influence. In A. Riles (Ed.), Rethinking the Masters of Comparative Law (p. 239). Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart.
[25] Pollock, F., & Maitland, M. (1898). History of English Law (2nd ed., p. 207). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[26] Rheinstein, M. (1956). In Memory of Ernst Rabel. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 5, 185-196.
[27] Riles, A. (1999). Wigmore’s Treasure Box: Comparative Law in the Era of Information (p. 228). Paper 1036, Ithaca, NY: Cornell Law School.
[28] Riles, A. (2001). Rethinking the Masters of Comparative Law (p. 2). Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart.
[29] Riles, A. (2014). From Comparison to Collaboration: Experiments with a New Scholarly and Political Form. Law and Contemporary Problems, 77, 1-25.
[30] Sacco, R. (1991). Legal Formants: A Dynamic Approach to Comparative Law (Installment I of II). American Journal of Comparative Law, 39, 1-34.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/840669
[31] Sarfatti, M. (1933). Introduzione allo studio del diritto comparato [Introduction to the Study of Comparative Law] (p. 2). Turin: Giappichelli.
[32] Scarciglia, R. (2015). Comparative Methodology and Pluralism in Legal Comparison in a Global Age. Beijing Law Review, 6, 42-48.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/blr.2015.61006
[33] Stevens, L. C. (1954). The Contribution of French Jurists to the Humanism of the Renaissance. Studies in the Renaissance, 1, 92-105.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2856954
[34] Van Caenegem, R. C. (1987). Judges, Legislators and Professors: Chapters in European Legal History (p. 58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511599361
[35] Verger, J. (1999). Les gens de savoir dans l’Europe de la fin du Moyen Age [Men of Learning in Europeat the End of the Middle Ages] (p. 70). Paris: PUF.
[36] Yntema, H. E. (1958). Comparative Law and Humanism. American Journal of Comparative Law, 7, 493-499.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/837261
[37] Zucca, L. (2009). Montesquieu, Methodological Pluralism and Comparative Constitutional Law. European Constitutional Law Review, 5, 481-500.
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1512494
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1574019609004817