Variables Affecting the Creativity of Undergraduate Students at Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University
Affiliation(s)
1 DIEd Student in Curriculum Research and Development, Faculty of Industrial Education, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology, Ladkrabang, Thailand. 2 Department of Educational Administration, Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
1 DIEd Student in Curriculum Research and Development, Faculty of Industrial Education, King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology, Ladkrabang, Thailand. 2 Department of Educational Administration, Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University, Nakhon Ratchasima, Thailand.
ABSTRACT
This descriptive research aims to investigate the construct validity of selected variables affecting the creativity of undergraduate students at Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University. Seven hundred and sixty students participated in this study. They were tested on items relating to their creativity. The results showed that executive administration, teaching, instructional attitudes, motivation, and personality variables affected the creativity of the undergraduates. Creativity consisted of originality, fluency, flexibility, and elaboration. All factor loadings were over 0.30. After confirmatory factor analysis on creativity, the results showed an acceptable goodness-of-fit (x2 = 0.51, df = 1, p-value = 0.47497, RMSEA = 0.000). This shows that creativity measured by the creativity test is in accordance with the empirical data. Executive administration consists of policy, mission, and identity. Teaching consists of objectives, content, activity, and evaluation components. Instructional climate consisted of support, acceptance and participation. Motivation consists of needs, drives, and satisfaction. Personality consists of freedom, trust, and self-esteem. The results of the CFA indicated that each construct was well represented by the items used for the measurements.
This descriptive research aims to investigate the construct validity of selected variables affecting the creativity of undergraduate students at Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University. Seven hundred and sixty students participated in this study. They were tested on items relating to their creativity. The results showed that executive administration, teaching, instructional attitudes, motivation, and personality variables affected the creativity of the undergraduates. Creativity consisted of originality, fluency, flexibility, and elaboration. All factor loadings were over 0.30. After confirmatory factor analysis on creativity, the results showed an acceptable goodness-of-fit (x2 = 0.51, df = 1, p-value = 0.47497, RMSEA = 0.000). This shows that creativity measured by the creativity test is in accordance with the empirical data. Executive administration consists of policy, mission, and identity. Teaching consists of objectives, content, activity, and evaluation components. Instructional climate consisted of support, acceptance and participation. Motivation consists of needs, drives, and satisfaction. Personality consists of freedom, trust, and self-esteem. The results of the CFA indicated that each construct was well represented by the items used for the measurements.
Cite this paper
Boonchan, B. , Pupat, P. and Seesan, B. (2015) Variables Affecting the Creativity of Undergraduate Students at Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University. Creative Education, 6, 2241-2249. doi: 10.4236/ce.2015.621231.
Boonchan, B. , Pupat, P. and Seesan, B. (2015) Variables Affecting the Creativity of Undergraduate Students at Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University. Creative Education, 6, 2241-2249. doi: 10.4236/ce.2015.621231.
References
[1] Amabile, T. (1996).Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. [2] Anderson, G. (1996). Learning Contracts: A Practical Guide. London: Kogan Page. [3] Boden, M. A. (2004). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms (2nd ed.). New Fetter, London: Routledge. [4] Boonwan, D. (2009). Variables Influencing Creativity of Grade 6 Students under the Jurisdiction of Suphan Buri Educational Service Area Office. M.Ed. Thesis, Kanchanaburi: KanchanaburiRajabhat University. [5] Dalton, D. R. (1988). Antecedents of Grievance Filing Behavior: Attitude/Behavioral Consistency and the Union Steward. The Academy of Management Journal, 25, 158-169.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256031 [6] Feist, G. J. (1999).The Influence of Personality on Artistic and Scientific Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.). Handbook of Creativity. London: Cambridge University Press. [7] Gardner, H. (2007). Five Minds for the Future. Cambridge: Harvard Business Review. [8] Guilford, J. P. (1991). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0063487 [9] Kosum, S. et al. (2006). Teaching Children to Think. Bangkok: Vichakarn Press. [10] Lubart, T. I. (1999). The Concept of Creativity: Prospects and Paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Handbook of Creativity. London: Cambridge University Press. [11] Martindale, C. (1989). Personality, Situation, and Creativity. New York: Plenum.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5356-1_13 [12] Moonkam, S. (2007). Fully Equipped to Think. Bangkok: Partnership Prints. [13] Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Societal and School Influences on Student Creativity: The Case of China. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 103-114.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.10072 [14] Office of the Education Council (2013). Thailand Education State for Population Report. Bangkok: Pim Dee Publishing House. [15] Paksanchai, M. (2008). The Development of the Cause and Effect Model of Creativity of Junior High School Students of the Archdiocese, Bangkok. M.Ed. Thesis, Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [16] Panjamawat, T. (2005). Causal Model of the Variables That Influence Student Creativity. M.Ed. Thesis, Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [17] Panmanee, A. (2007). Psychological Creative Teaching. Bangkok: Yaimai Educated Press. [18] Rojsuparat, P. (2004). A Comparative Study of Creativity of Early Childhood on Drawing Activity between Individual and Selective. M.Ed. Thesis, Bangkok: Srinakharinwirot University. [19] Samakwong, S. (2005). Comparative Analysis of Model Variables That Influence on Mathematical Creations of Grade 5 Students under the Jurisdiction of Roiet Educational Service Area Office with PAQ Analysis and PAL. M.Ed. Thesis, Mahasarakam: Mahasarakam University. [20] Sawyer, R. K. (1995). Creative Insight: The Social Dimension of a Solitary Moment. London: MIT Press. [21] Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2009). Schools That Learn a Fifth Discipline Fieldbook for Educators, Parents, and Everyone who Cares about Education. New York: Doubleday/Currency. [22] Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom, Intelligence, and Creativity Synthesized. London: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509612 [23] Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in Creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677-688.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.677 [24] Torrance, E. P. (1994). Creativity: Just Wanting to Know. Pretoria: Benedict Books. [25] Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, a Wiley Imprint. [26] Veerachareonkij, T. (2006). A Comparison of Critical Thinking and Creativity between Students with Different Learning Styles. M.Ed. Thesis, Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [27] Vernon, P. E. (1989). The Nature-Nurture Problem in Creativity. New York: Plenum Publishing Corp. [28] Vilaipis, V. (2004). Factors Affecting Mathematics Creativity of Grade 3 Students under the Jurisdiction of Roiet Educational Service Area Office: Multilevel Analysis by Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling. M.Ed. Thesis, Mahasarakam: Mahasarakam University. [29] Yokubon, N. (2012). Factors Affecting the Achievement of Science. Grade 6 Students at Demonstration Schools under the Commission on Higher Education, Ministry of Education. Journal of Education and Social Development, 8, 56-62.
[1] Amabile, T. (1996).Creativity in Context. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. [2] Anderson, G. (1996). Learning Contracts: A Practical Guide. London: Kogan Page. [3] Boden, M. A. (2004). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms (2nd ed.). New Fetter, London: Routledge. [4] Boonwan, D. (2009). Variables Influencing Creativity of Grade 6 Students under the Jurisdiction of Suphan Buri Educational Service Area Office. M.Ed. Thesis, Kanchanaburi: KanchanaburiRajabhat University. [5] Dalton, D. R. (1988). Antecedents of Grievance Filing Behavior: Attitude/Behavioral Consistency and the Union Steward. The Academy of Management Journal, 25, 158-169.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/256031 [6] Feist, G. J. (1999).The Influence of Personality on Artistic and Scientific Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.). Handbook of Creativity. London: Cambridge University Press. [7] Gardner, H. (2007). Five Minds for the Future. Cambridge: Harvard Business Review. [8] Guilford, J. P. (1991). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0063487 [9] Kosum, S. et al. (2006). Teaching Children to Think. Bangkok: Vichakarn Press. [10] Lubart, T. I. (1999). The Concept of Creativity: Prospects and Paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), Handbook of Creativity. London: Cambridge University Press. [11] Martindale, C. (1989). Personality, Situation, and Creativity. New York: Plenum.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-5356-1_13 [12] Moonkam, S. (2007). Fully Equipped to Think. Bangkok: Partnership Prints. [13] Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Societal and School Influences on Student Creativity: The Case of China. Psychology in the Schools, 40, 103-114.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.10072 [14] Office of the Education Council (2013). Thailand Education State for Population Report. Bangkok: Pim Dee Publishing House. [15] Paksanchai, M. (2008). The Development of the Cause and Effect Model of Creativity of Junior High School Students of the Archdiocese, Bangkok. M.Ed. Thesis, Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [16] Panjamawat, T. (2005). Causal Model of the Variables That Influence Student Creativity. M.Ed. Thesis, Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [17] Panmanee, A. (2007). Psychological Creative Teaching. Bangkok: Yaimai Educated Press. [18] Rojsuparat, P. (2004). A Comparative Study of Creativity of Early Childhood on Drawing Activity between Individual and Selective. M.Ed. Thesis, Bangkok: Srinakharinwirot University. [19] Samakwong, S. (2005). Comparative Analysis of Model Variables That Influence on Mathematical Creations of Grade 5 Students under the Jurisdiction of Roiet Educational Service Area Office with PAQ Analysis and PAL. M.Ed. Thesis, Mahasarakam: Mahasarakam University. [20] Sawyer, R. K. (1995). Creative Insight: The Social Dimension of a Solitary Moment. London: MIT Press. [21] Senge, P., Cambron-McCabe, N., Lucas, T., Smith, B., Dutton, J., & Kleiner, A. (2009). Schools That Learn a Fifth Discipline Fieldbook for Educators, Parents, and Everyone who Cares about Education. New York: Doubleday/Currency. [22] Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Wisdom, Intelligence, and Creativity Synthesized. London: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509612 [23] Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in Creativity. American Psychologist, 51, 677-688.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.677 [24] Torrance, E. P. (1994). Creativity: Just Wanting to Know. Pretoria: Benedict Books. [25] Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, a Wiley Imprint. [26] Veerachareonkij, T. (2006). A Comparison of Critical Thinking and Creativity between Students with Different Learning Styles. M.Ed. Thesis, Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [27] Vernon, P. E. (1989). The Nature-Nurture Problem in Creativity. New York: Plenum Publishing Corp. [28] Vilaipis, V. (2004). Factors Affecting Mathematics Creativity of Grade 3 Students under the Jurisdiction of Roiet Educational Service Area Office: Multilevel Analysis by Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling. M.Ed. Thesis, Mahasarakam: Mahasarakam University. [29] Yokubon, N. (2012). Factors Affecting the Achievement of Science. Grade 6 Students at Demonstration Schools under the Commission on Higher Education, Ministry of Education. Journal of Education and Social Development, 8, 56-62.