OJFD  Vol.5 No.4 , December 2015
Control of Transonic Shock Wave Oscillation over a Supercritical Airfoil
ABSTRACT
In the present study, a numerical investigation is carried out on the aerodynamic performance of a supercritical airfoil RAE 2822. Transonic flow fields are considered where self-excited shock wave oscillation prevails. To control the shock oscillation, a passive technique in the form of an open rectangular cavity is introduced on the upper surface of the airfoil where the shock wave oscillates. Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations have been used to predict the aerodynamic behavior of the baseline airfoil and airfoil with cavity at Mach number of 0.729 and at angle of attack of 5°. The aerodynamic characteristics of the baseline airfoil are well validated with the available experimental data. It is observed that the introduction of a cavity around the airfoil upper surface can completely stop the self-excited shock wave oscillation and successively improve the aerodynamic characteristics.

Cite this paper
Rahman, M. , Labib, M. , Hasan, A. , Joy, M. , Setoguchi, T. and Kim, H. (2015) Control of Transonic Shock Wave Oscillation over a Supercritical Airfoil. Open Journal of Fluid Dynamics, 5, 302-310. doi: 10.4236/ojfd.2015.54031.
References
[1]   Tijdeman, H. (1977) Investigation of the Transonic Flow around Oscillating Airfoils. PhD. Thesis, TU Delft, Delft.

[2]   McDevitt, J.B., Levy, L.L. and Deiwert, G.S. (1976) Transonic Flow about a Thick Circular-Arc Airfoil. AIAA Journal, 14, 603-613.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/3.61402

[3]   Levy, L.L. (1978) Experimental and Computational Steady and Unsteady Transonic Flows about a Thick Airfoil. AIAA Journal, 16, 564-572.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/3.60935

[4]   Alshabu, A. and Olivier, H. (2008) Unsteady Wave Phenomena on a Supercritical Airfoil. AIAA Journal, 46, 2066- 2073.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.35516

[5]   Zhao, Z., Ren, X., Gao, C., Xiong, J., Liu, F. and Luo, S. (2013) Experimental Study of Shock Wave Oscillation on SC (2)-0714 Airfoil. Proceedings of the 51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Dallas, 7-10 January 2013, AIAA 2013-0537.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-537

[6]   Qin, N., Zhu, Y. and Shaw, S.T. (2004) Numerical Study of Active Shock Control for Transonic Aerodynamics. International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow, 14, 444-466.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09615530410532240

[7]   Hasan, A.B.M.T., Matsuo, S., Setoguchi, T. and Islam, A.K.M.S. (2012) Effects of Condensing Moist Air on Shock Induced Oscillation around an Airfoil in Transonic Internal Flows. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 54, 249-259.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2011.11.004

[8]   Stanewsky, E. (2001) Adaptive Wing and Flow Control Technology. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 37, 583-667.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0376-0421(01)00017-3

[9]   Li, J., Lee, C.H., Jia, L. and Li, X. (2009) Numerical Study on Flow Control by Micro-Blowing. Proceedings of the 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Orlando, 5-8 January 2009, AIAA 2009-779.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-779

[10]   Ashill, P.R., Fulker, J.L. and Shires, J.L. (1992) A Novel Technique for Controlling Shock Strength of Laminar-Flow Airfoil Sections. Proceedings of the 1st European Forum on Laminar Flow Technology, Hamburg, 16-18 March 1992, 175-183.

[11]   Hasan, A.B.M.T. and Alam, M. (2014) A Numerical Study on the Control of Self-Excited Shock Induced Oscillation in Transonic Flow around a Supercritical Airfoil. International Journal of Fluid Mechanics Research, 41, 440-459.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1615/InterJFluidMechRes.v41.i5.50

[12]   Mazaheri, K., Kiani, K.C., Nejati, A., Zeinalpour, M. and Taheri, R. (2015) Optimization and Analysis of Shock Wave/Boundary Layer Interaction for Drag Reduction by Shock Control Bump. Aerospace Science and Technology, 42, 196-208.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2015.01.007

[13]   Bahi, L., Ross, J.M. and Nagamatsu, H.T. (1983) Passive Shock Wave/Boundary Layer Control for Transonic Airfoil Drag Reduction. Proceedings of the 21st Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, 10-13 January 1983, AIAA-83-0137.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.1983-137

[14]   McComick, D.C. (1993) Shock/Boundary-Layer Interaction Control with Vortex Generators and Passive Cavity. AIAA Journal, 31, 91-96.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/3.11323

[15]   Rahman, M.M., Hasan, A.B.M.T., Islam, A.K.M.S., Matsuo, S. and Setoguchi, T. (2015) Computation of Transonic Internal Flow around a Biconvex Airfoil with Cavity. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 29, 2415-2421.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12206-015-0540-0

[16]   Smith, A.N., Babinsky, H., Dhanasekaran, P.C., Savil, A.M. and Dawes, W.N. (2003) Computational Investigation of Groove Controlled Shock Wave/Boundary Layer Interaction. Proceedings of the 41st Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, 6-9 January 2003, AIAA 2003-0446.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-446

[17]   Bur, R., Corbel, B. and Delery, J. (1998) Study of Passive Control in a Transonic Shock/Wave Boundary Layer Interaction. AIAA Journal, 36, 394-400.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/2.376

[18]   Yagiz, B., Kandil, O., Pehlivanoglu, Y.V. (2012) Drag Minimization Using Passive and Active Flow Control Techniques. Aerospace Science and Technology, 17, 21-31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2011.03.003

[19]   Menter, F.R. (1994) Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications. AIAA Journal, 32, 1598-1605.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/3.12149

[20]   ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg. www.ansys.com

[21]   Cook, P.H., McDonald, M.A. and Firmin, M.C.P. (1977) Aerofoil RAE 2822: Pressure Distribution and Boundary Layer and Wake Measurements. AGARD AR 138, A6-1-A6-77.

[22]   Coakley, T. (1987) Numerical Simulation of Viscous Transonic Airfoil Flows. Proceedings of the AIAA 25th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, 12-15 January 1987, AIAA-87-0416.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.1987-416

[23]   Yu, T., Wang, J.J. and Zhang, P.F. (2011) Numerical Simulation of Gurney Flap on RAE-2822 Supercritical Airfoil. Journal of Aircraft, 48, 1565-1575.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/1.C031285

 
 
Top