PSYCH  Vol.6 No.15 , December 2015
A Complimentary Ministry? The Psychological Type of Clergy Women in the Church in Wales
Author(s) Mandy Robbins
ABSTRACT
The debate around the admission of women to the ministry of the Anglican churches has focused on a number of issues, not least, the extent to which women bring “balance” to ministry (see for example Furlong, 1991). Balance, when used in this context is usually seen as bringing different gifts to ministry. The assumption often made is that these “different gifts” will be those traditionally associated with women such as work with children. This argument has been employed by both those for and against the entry of women into holy orders (Harris & Shaw, 2004; Baker, 2004). Benjamin Schneider’s attraction-selection-attrition theory suggests that the group of people within an organisation move toward homogeneity. Schneider’s theory would suggest that the argument that women bring balance to ministry would not be supported. The current study employs psychological type theory to explore whether clergywomen in the Church in Wales do bring “balance” to ministry or “homogeneity”. The psychological type profile of a sample of 75 Church in Wales clergywomen measured by the Francis Psychological Type Scales (FPTS) is compared with a sample of 266 Church in Wales clergymen (Francis, Payne, & Robbins, 2013). The findings present no significant differences between the clergymen and clergywomen with regard to their judging function, perceiving function, orientation to the outer world or attitude toward the outer world. This finding lends support to Schneider’s theory. The implications of these findings for ministry in the Church in Wales are discussed.

Cite this paper
Robbins, M. (2015) A Complimentary Ministry? The Psychological Type of Clergy Women in the Church in Wales. Psychology, 6, 1951-1956. doi: 10.4236/psych.2015.615192.
References
[1]   Avis, P. (1999). Anglican Orders and the Priesting of Women. Darton, Longman and Todd: London.

[2]   Baker, J. (2004). Consecrated Women? A Contribution to the Women Bishops’ Debate. Norwich: Canterbury Press.

[3]   Burns, J., Francis, L. J., Village, A., & Robbins, M. (2013). Psychological Type Profile of Roman Catholic Priests: An Empirical Enquiry in the United States. Pastoral Psychology, 62, 239-246.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11089-012-0483-7

[4]   Burton, L., Francis, L. J., & Robbins, M. (2010). Psychological Type Profile of Methodist Circuit Minister in Britain: Similarities to and Differences from Anglican Clergy. Journal of Empirical Theology, 23, 64-81.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157092510X503020

[5]   Francis, L. J. (2005). Faith and Psychology: Personality, Religion and the Individual. London: Darton, Longman and Todd.

[6]   Francis, L. J., Craig, C. L., & Hall, G. (2008). Psychological Type and Attitude toward Celtic Christianity among Committed Churchgoers in the United Kingdom: An Empirical Study. Journal of Contemporary Christianity, 23, 181-191.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13537900802024543

[7]   Francis, L. J., Craig, C. L., Whinney, M., Tilley, D., & Slater, P. (2007). Psychological Profiling of Anglican Clergy in England: Employing Jungian Typology to Interpret Diversity, Strengths, and Potential Weaknesses in Ministry. International Journal of Practical Theology, 11, 266-284.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/IJPT.2007.17

[8]   Francis, L. J., Payne, V. J., & Robbins, M. (2013). Psychological Type and Susceptibility to Burnout: A Study among Anglican Clergymen in Wales. In B. R. Doolittle (Ed.), Psychology of Burnout: New Research (pp. 179-192). New York, NY: Nova Science.

[9]   Francis, L. J., & Robbins, M. (2012). Not Fitting in and Getting Out: Psychological Type and Congregational Satisfaction among Anglican Churchgoers in England. Mental Health, Religion and Culture, 15, 1023-1036.

[10]   Francis, L. J., Robbins, M., Duncan, B., & Whinney, M. (2010). Confirming the Psychological Type Profile of Anglican Clergymen in England: A Ministry for Intuitives. In B. Ruelas & V. Briseno (Eds.), Psychology of Intuition (pp. 211-219). New York, NY: Nova Science Publishers.

[11]   Francis, L. J., Robbins, M., Williams, A., & Williams, R. (2007). All Types Are Called, but Some Are More Likely to Respond: The Psychological Profile of Rural Anglican Churchgoers in Wales. Rural Theology, 5, 23-30.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/rut_2007_5_1_003

[12]   Furlong, M. (1991). A Dangerous Delight. SPCK: London.

[13]   Harris, H., & Shaw, J. (2004) (Eds.). The Call for Women Bishops. London: SPCK.

[14]   Jones, I. (2004). Women and Priesthood in the Church of England: Ten Years on. London: Church House Publishing.

[15]   Jung, C. G. (1971). Psychological Types: The Collected Works, Volume 6. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

[16]   Myers, I. B., & McCaulley, M. H. (1985). Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

[17]   Myers, I. B., & Myers, P. B. (1980). Gifts Differing. Palo Alto: CA, Consulting Psychologists Press.

[18]   Schneider, B. (1987). The People Make the Place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1987.tb00609.x

[19]   Schneider, B., Goldstein, H. W., & Smith, D. B. (1995). The Attraction-Selection-Attrition Framework: An Update. Personnel Psychology, 48, 747-773.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01780.x

[20]   Thorne, H. (2000). Journey to Priesthood: An In-Depth Study of the First Women Priests in the Church of England. Bristol: CCSRG Monograph Series 5.

 
 
Top