OJOG  Vol.5 No.14 , December 2015
Using Alert and Action Expected Times of Delivery in Prevention of Prolonged Labor
ABSTRACT
Background and Objective: Although globally admitted as the most valuable tool to prevent prolongation of labor, the partogram has failed to be commonly used. This is due to its alleged complexity. Based on the simplified model proposed by Debdas, the so called paperless partogram, we aimed at evaluating the ability of only using the alert and action lines to prevent prolongation of labor. Methods: This was a cross-sectional study including labor records of women delivered at King Baudouin Hospital of Kinshasa (secondary level) from 01/01 till 31/12/2013. The study was approved by the Faculty Ethical Committee. Inclusion criteria were: 1) live singleton pregnancy, 2) cephalic fetal presentation, 3) lack of uterine scar, 4) monitoring in labor ward by 4 cm of cervical dilation, and 5) delivery at term. For every record, the expected time of delivery (ETD = 6 hours after 4 cm of cervical dilation) was considered “Alert EDT” to which 4 hours were added to obtain the “Action EDT”. Irrespective of other fetal and maternal features contained in the traditional partogram Alert and Action ETD were checked a posteriori on Debdas’s model to derive the appropriate outcome of labor. Results: The study included 357 participants, of which 219 primiparous and 138 multiparous. Vaginal delivery took place in 91% of cases. Full cervical dilation was achieved after 8 - 9 hours (9.5 ± 1.8 hours for primiparous and 8.4 ± 1.7 hours for multiparous women), namely 2 - 3 hours following Alert ETD). This duration is close to the Action ETD. For 32 cesarean sections (9%) final decision took place within the Alert ETD. Conclusion: Using only Alert and Action ETD was found convenient to derive appropriate measures for the outcome of labor. So, the paperless partogram is a simplified method to manage the active stage of labor that could prevent prolongation of labor in our setting.

Cite this paper
Tandu-Umba, N. and Muamba, G. (2015) Using Alert and Action Expected Times of Delivery in Prevention of Prolonged Labor. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5, 813-818. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2015.514115.
References
[1]   Friedman, E.A. (1955) Primigravid Labour. A Graphicostatistical Analysis. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 6, 567-589.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006250-195512000-00001

[2]   Philpott, R.H. and Castle, W.M. (1972) Cervicographs in the Management of Labour in Primigravidae. International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 79, 592-598.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1972.tb14207.x

[3]   World Health Organization (1994) World Health Organization Partograph in Management of Labour. Lancet, 343, 1399-1404.

[4]   Tayade, S. and Jadhao, P. (2012) The Impact of Use of Modified WHO Partograph on Maternal and Prenatal Outcome. International Journal of Biomedical Advanced Research, 3, 256-262.
http://dx.doi.org/10.7439/ijbar.v3i4.398

[5]   Walraven, G.E. (1994) WHO Partograph. Lancet, 344, 617.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(94)92004-4

[6]   Lavender, T., Hart, A. and Smyth, R.M.D. (2008) Effect of Partogram Use on Outcomes for Women in Spontaneous Labour at Term. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 8, 16.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd005461.pub2

[7]   Soni, B.L. (2009) Effect of Partogram Use on Outcomes for Women in Spontaneous Labour at Term: RHL Commentary. The WHO Reproductive Health Library, World Health Organization, Geneva.

[8]   Lavender, T. and Malcolmson, L. (1999) Is the Partogram a Help or a Hindrance? An Exploratory Study of Midwives’ Views. Practice for Midwife, 2, 23-27.

[9]   Bah, E., Camara, H., Dao, B., Aribot, J., Hyjaz, Y. and Pleah, T. (2013) Partogram: Quality of Use and Caregivers’ Opinion in Guinea. 1st African Congress of FIGO, Addis Ababa, 3-7 October 2013.

[10]   Kanagema, J.D. and Levin, K. (2008) Use of the Partograph: What Do We Know? What Do We Need to Find out? USAID Presentation.

[11]   Debbas, A.K. (2008) Paperless Partogram. 41th Annual Scientific Sessions of Sri Lanka College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, 1, 124.

[12]   Agarwal, K., Agarwal, L., Agarwal, V.K., Agarwal, A. and Sharma, M. (2013) Evaluation of Paperless Partogram as a Bedside Tool in the Management of Labor. Journal of Family Medical and Primary Care, 2, 47-49.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2249-4863.109944

[13]   Adler, E. and Wirth, M. (2012) The Paperless Partogram: A Simplified Tool to Prevent Prolonged Labor.

[14]   (2011) The Regional Meeting on the Acceleration of Partograph Use in East, Central and South Africa (ECSA), Nairobi, 11-12 May 2011.

[15]   Asibong, U., Okokon, I.B., Agan, T.U., Oku, A., Opiah, M., Essien, J. and Monjok, E. (2014) The Use of the Partograph in Labor Monitoring: A Cross-Sectional Study among Obstetric Caregivers in General Hospital, Calabar, Cross River State. Nigeria International Journal of Women’s Health, 6, 873-880.

[16]   Fatouh, E. and Ramadan, S. (2015) Effect of Using Paperless Partogram on the Management and Outcome of Labour and the Nurses’ Opinion. Journal of Education and Practice, 6, 47-49.

 
 
Top