Cite this paper
Kracklauer, A. (2015) Entanglement: A Contrarian View.
Journal of Modern Physics,
6, 1961-1968. doi:
10.4236/jmp.2015.613202.
References
[1] Greenstein, G. and Zajonc, A.G. (1997) The Quantum Challenge. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Sudbury.
[2] Schroedinger, E. (1935) Die gegenwärtige Situation in der Quantenmechanik (The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics). Naturwissenschaften, 23, 887-812.
[3] Einstein, A. (1948) Quantum Mechanics and Reality. Dialectica, 2, 320-324.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-8361.1948.tb00704.x
[4] Kracklauer, A.F. (2002) Is Entanglement Always Entangled? Journal of Optics B: Quantum and Semiclassical Optics, 4, S121-S126.
[5] Jaynes, E.T. (1989) Clearing up Mysteries: The Original Goal. In: Skilling, J., Ed., Maximum Entropy and Baysian Methods, Kluwer Academic Press, Dordrecht, 1-27.
[6] Kracklauer, A.F. (2006) What’s Wrong with This Rebuttal. Foundations of Physics Letters, 19, 625-629.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10702-006-1016-3
[7] Kracklauer, A.F. (2007) Bell's Ansatz and Probability. Optics and Spectroscopy, 108, 451-458.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X07090147
[8] Misrahi, S.S. and Moussa, M.H.Y. (1993) Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Correlations for Light Polarization. International Journal of Modern Physics B, 7, 1321-1330.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S0217979293002341
[9] Kracklauer, A.F. (2015) What Is a Photon? Proc. of SPIE 9570, No. 21.