Back
 CUS  Vol.3 No.4 , December 2015
Re-Finding PL.AC.E. for Walking: Assessment of Key-Elements Using Questionnaire
Abstract: Many studies had already been conducted to acknowledge the contribution of walking in sustainable urban development. After conducting a literature study, authors identified the 3 (three) keyelements and introduced them as PL.AC.E. (abbreviation of Profile, Activity, and Environment), of the pedestrian. The Pedestrian Profile was defined as a combination of the following key-attributes: age; financial income; physical condition; gender; mobility choice; employment and education; social cultural capital; pedestrian type; and public transportation usage. The Pedestrian Activity was defined from the key-attributes as follow: walking-related purposes; social interaction; walking intensity; walking habits; and transport modes interaction. Then the Pedestrian Environment was defined within key-attributes of: spatial planning; walk-ability; neighborhood livability; traffic safety; pedestrian facilities (hard elements); pedestrian facilities (soft elements); and environmental quality. In this study, authors would assess those key-elements by distributing a questionnaire to a group of freshmen of the Department of Architecture in the University of Kitakyushu, Japan as a trial experiment. Total 58 responses were recorded and then analyzed using correlations type statistical analysis. It was then concluded that there are indications that those key-elements could be addressed in the planning process of a walk-able urban environment. However in order to validate the result, authors would continue to further distribute the questionnaire to various respondents within different case study areas.
Cite this paper: Nuzir, F.A., & Dewancker, B. (2015) Re-Finding PL.AC.E. for Walking: Assessment of Key-Elements Using Questionnaire. Current Urban Studies, 3, 267-285. doi: 10.4236/cus.2015.34023.
References

[1]   Blanco, H., Alberti, M., Forsyth, A., Krizek, K. J., Rodríguez, D. A., Talen, E., & Ellis, C. (2009). Hot, Congested, Crowded and Diverse: Emerging Research Agendas in Planning. Progress in Planning, 71, 153-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2009.03.001

[2]   Brown, B. B., Werner, C. M., Amburgey, J. W., & Szalay, C. (2007). Walkable Route Perceptions and Physical Features: Converging Evidence for En Route Walking Experiences. Environment and Behavior, 39, 34-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916506295569

[3]   Hass-Klau, C. (2015). The Pedestrian and the City. New York: Routledge.

[4]   Institution for Economics and Peace (2015). Global Peace Index 2015. New York.

[5]   Loukaitou-Sideris, A. (2006). Is It Safe to Walk? Neighborhood Safety and Security Considerations and Their Effects on Walking. Journal of Planning Literature, 20, 219-232.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0885412205282770

[6]   Manaugh, K., & El-Geneidy, A. M. (2011). Validating Walkability Indices?: How Do Different Households Respond to the Walkability of Their Neighbourhood? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16, 309-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.01.009

[7]   Mateo-Babiano, I., & Ieda, H. (2007). Street Space Sustainability in Asia: The Role of the Asian Pedestrian and Street Culture. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 7, 1915-1930.

[8]   Nuzir, F. A., & Dewancker, B. J. (in press). Redefining PLACE for Walking: A Literature Review and Key-Elements Conception. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management.

[9]   Nuzir, F. A., & Dewancker, B. J. (2015). Understanding How to Improve Urban Walking Condition in Japanese Low Carbon Society. In Architectural Institute of Japan (Ed.), 54th Architectural Institute of Japan Kyushu Branch Research Meeting (pp. 457-460). Kumamoto: Architectural Institute of Japan.

[10]   Parks, J. R., & Schofer, J. L. (2006). Characterizing Neighborhood Pedestrian Environments with Secondary Data. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 11, 250-263.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2006.04.003

[11]   Sauter, D., Hogertz, C., Tight, M., Thomas, R., & Zaidel, D. (2010). Emotions of the Urban Pedestrian: Sensory Mapping. Pedestrians’ Quality Needs. Cheltenham: WALK21.
http://www.walkeurope.org/uploads/File/publications/PQN%20Final%20Report%20part%20B4.pdf

[12]   Tsukaguchi, H. (2010). Comparative Study of Pedestrian Travel Culture in Different Cities in Japan. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 8, 1164-1178.

 
 
Top