JSEA  Vol.8 No.10 , October 2015
The Acceptance and Use of Computer Based Assessment in Higher Education
ABSTRACT
Computer Based Assessment (CBA) is being a very popular method to evaluate students’ performance at the university level. This research aims to examine the constructs that affect students’ intention to use the CBA. The proposed model is based on previous technology models such as Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), and Unified Theory of Acceptance and Usage of Technology (TAUT). The proposed CBA model is based on nine variables: Goal Expectancy, Social Influence, Facilitating Conditions, Computer Self Efficacy, Content, Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Playfulness, and Behavioral Intention. Data were collected using a survey questionnaire from 546 participants who had used the computer based exam system at the University of Jordan. Results indicate that Perceived Playfulness has a direct effect on CBA use. Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Usefulness, Computer Self Efficacy, Social Influence, Facilitating Conditions, Content and Goal Expectancy have only indirect effects. The study concludes that a system is more likely to be used by students if it is playful and CBA is more likely to be playful when it is easy to use and useful. Finally, the studied acceptance model for computer based assessment explains approximately only 10% of the variance of behavioral intention to use CBA.

Cite this paper
Maqableh, M. , Masa’deh, R. and Mohammed, A. (2015) The Acceptance and Use of Computer Based Assessment in Higher Education. Journal of Software Engineering and Applications, 8, 557-574. doi: 10.4236/jsea.2015.810053.
References
[1]   Joosten-ten Brinke, D., van Bruggen, J., Hermans, H., Burgers, J., Giesbers, B., Koper, R. and Latour, I. (2007) Modeling Assessment for Re-Use of Traditional and New Types of Assessment. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2721-2741.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2006.08.009

[2]   Siozos, P., Palaigeorgiou, G., Triantafyllakos, G. and Despotakis, T. (2009) Computer Based Testing Using “Digital Ink”: Participatory Design of a Tablet PC Based Assessment Application for Secondary Education. Computers & Education, 52, 811-819.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.12.006

[3]   Moridis, C.N. and Economides, A.A. (2009) Mood Recognition during Online Self-Assessment Test. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2, 50-61.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2009.12

[4]   Terzis, V. and Economides, A.A. (2011) The Acceptance and Use of Computer Based Assessment. Computers & Education, 56, 1032-1044.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.11.017

[5]   Maqableh, M. (2012) Analysis and Design Security Primitives Based on Chaotic Systems for eCommerce. Durham University.

[6]   Karajeh, H., Maqableh, M. and Masa’deh, R. (2014) A Review on Stereoscopic 3D: Home Entertainment for the Twenty First Century. 3D Research-Springer, 5, 1-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13319-014-0026-3

[7]   Deutsch, T., Herrmann, K., Frese, T. and Sandholzer, H. (2012) Implementing Computer-Based Assessment—A Web-Based Mock Examination Changes Attitudes. Computers and Education, 58, 1068-1075.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.11.013

[8]   Masa’deh, R. (2013) A Structural Equation Modeling Approach for Determining Antecedents and Outcomes of Students’ Attitude toward Mobile Commerce Adoption. Life Science Journal, 10, 2321-2333.

[9]   Sieber, V. and Young, D. (2008) Factors Associated with the Successful Introduction of On-Line Diagnostic, Formative and Summative Assessment in the Medical Sciences Division University of Oxford, 267-278.
http://caaconference.co.uk/pastConferences/2008/proceedings/Seiber_V_Young_D_final_formatted_ e1.pdf

[10]   Ko, C.C. and Cheng, C.D. (2008) Flexible and Secure Computer-Based Assessment Using a Single Zip Disk. Computers and Education, 50, 915-926.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.010

[11]   Davis, F.D. (1989) Perceived Usefulness Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319-340.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/249008

[12]   Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F.D. (1996) A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test. Decision Science, 27, 451-481.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1996.tb01822.x

[13]   Kreiter, C.D., Ferguson, K. and Gruppen, L.D. (1999) Evaluating the Usefulness of Computerized Adaptive Testing for Medical In-Course Assessment. Academic Medicine: Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 74, 1125-1128.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199910000-00016

[14]   Terzis, V., Moridis, C.N. and Economides, A.A. (2012) How Student’s Personality Traits Affect Computer Based Assessment Acceptance: Integrating BFI with CBAAM. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1985-1996.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.05.019

[15]   Terzis, V., Moridis, C.N. and Economides, A.A. (2013) Continuance Acceptance of Computer Based Assessment through the Integration of User’s Expectations and Perceptions. Computers and Education, 62, 50-61.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.018

[16]   Thelwall, M. (2000) Computer-Based Assessment: A Versatile Educational Tool. Computers & Education, 34, 37-49.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00037-8

[17]   Jantz, C., Anderson, J. and Gould, S.M. (2002) Using Computer-Based Assessments to Evaluate Interactive Multimedia Nutrition Education among Low-Income Predominantly Hispanic Participants. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 34, 252-260.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1499-4046(06)60103-6

[18]   He, L. and Brandt, P. (2007) WEAS: A Web-Based Educational Assessment System. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Southeast Regional Conference, ACM, New York, 126-131.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1233341.1233365

[19]   JImoh, R.G., Yussuff, M.A., Akanmu, M.A., Enikuomehin, A.O. and Salman, I.R. (2011) Acceptability of Computer Based Testing (CBT) Mode for Undergraduate Courses in Computer Science. Journal of Science, Technology, Mathematics and Education (JOSTMED), 7, 11-20.

[20]   Saleem, H., Beaudry, A. and Croteau, A.M. (2011) Antecedents of Computer Self-Efficacy: A Study of the Role of Personality Traits and Gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1922-1936.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.04.017

[21]   Alquraan, M.F. (2012) Methods of Assessing Students’ Learning in Higher Education: An Analysis of Jordanian College and Grading System. Education, Business and Society: Contemporary Middle Eastern Issues, 5, 124-133.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17537981211251160

[22]   Jimoh, R.G., Shittu, A.K. and Kawu, Y.K. (2012) Students’ Perception of Computer Based Test (CBT) for Examining Undergraduate Chemistry Courses. Journal of Emerging Trends in Computing and Information Sciences, 3, 125-134.

[23]   Van Der Kleij, F.M., Eggen, T.J.H.M., Timmers, C.F. and Veldkamp, B.P. (2012) Effects of Feedback in a Computer-Based Assessment for Learning. Computers and Education, 58, 263-272.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.020

[24]   Quellmalz, E. (2014) Computer-Based Assessment. In: Gunston, R., Ed., Encyclopedia of Science Education SE-44-2, Springer, Dordrecht, 1-6.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6165-0_44-2

[25]   Terzis, V., Moridis, C.N., Economides, A.A. and Mendez, G.R. (2013) Computer Based Assessment Acceptance: A Cross-Cultural Study in Greece and Mexico. Educational Technology and Society, 16, 411-424.

[26]   Abduh, H.Y., Hussin, R., Bin, C. and Dahlan, H.M. (2014) Technology Acceptance for CBT in Secondary Schools of Saudi Arabia, 3-6.

[27]   Huff, K.C. (2015) The Comparison of Mobile Devices to Computers for Web-Based Assessments. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 208-212.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.008

[28]   Timmers, C.F., Walraven, A. and Veldkamp, B.P. (2015) The Effect of Regulation Feedback in a Computer-Based Formative Assessment on Information Problem Solving. Computers & Education, 87, 1-9.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.012

[29]   Landry, B.J.L., Griffeth, R. and Hartman, S. (2006) Measuring Student Perceptions of Blackboard Using the Technology Acceptance Model. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4, 87-99.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00103.x

[30]   Terzis, V., Moridis, C.N. and Economides, A.A. (2011) The Extension of the Computer Based Assessment Acceptance Model with Perceived Importance. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Interactive Computer-Aided Blended Learning, Antigua Guatemala, 2-4 November 2011.

[31]   Liao, H.L. and Lu, H.P. (2008) The Role of Experience and Innovation Characteristics in the Adoption and Continued Use of E-Learning Websites. Computers and Education, 51, 1405-1416.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.11.006

[32]   Teo, T. (2009) Modeling Technology Acceptance in Education: A Study of Pre-Service Teachers. Computers & Education, 52, 302-312.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006

[33]   Mayer, R.E. (2002) A Taxonomy for Computer-Based Assessment of Problem Solving. Computers in Human Behavior, 18, 623-632.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00020-1

[34]   Gikandi, J.W., Morrow, D. and Davis, N.E. (2011) Online Formative Assessment in Higher Education: A Review of the Literature. Computers and Education, 57, 2333-2351.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.004

[35]   Terzis, V. and Economides, A.A. (2011) Computer Based Assessment: Gender Differences in Perceptions and Acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 2108-2122.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.06.005

[36]   Nirmalakhandan, N. (2013) Improving Problem-Solving Skills of Undergraduates through Computerized Dynamic Assessment. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 83, 615-621.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.117

[37]   Pilli, O. and Aksu, M. (2013) The Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on the Achievement, Attitudes and Retention of Fourth Grade Mathematics Students in North Cyprus. Computers and Education, 62, 62-71.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.010

[38]   Moon, J.W. and Kim, Y.G. (2001) Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web Context. Information and Management, 38, 217-230.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6

[39]   Malone, T.W. (1981) Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 5, 333-369.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0504_2

[40]   Lee, Y.C. (2008) The Role of Perceived Resources in Online Learning Adoption. Computers and Education, 50, 1423-1438.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.01.001

[41]   Ong, C.S. and Lai, J.Y. (2006) Gender Differences in Perceptions and Relationships among Dominants of E-Learning Acceptance. Computers in Human Behavior, 22, 816-829.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.006

[42]   Van Raaij, E.M. and Schepers, J.J.L. (2008) The Acceptance and Use of a Virtual Learning Environment in China. Computers & Education, 50, 838-852.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.09.001

[43]   Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J. (1999) Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies? Decision Sciences, 30, 361-391.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01614.x

[44]   Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V. and Stair, R.M. (2000) Research Report: The Evolving Relationship between General and Specific Computer Self-Efficacy? An Empirical Assessment. Information Systems Research, 11, 418-430.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/isre.11.4.418.11876

[45]   Garrido-Moreno, A., Padilla-Mele, A. and Del Aguila-Obra, A.R. (2008) Factors Affecting E-Collaboration Technology Use among Management Students. Computers & Education, 51, 609-623.

[46]   Karahanna, E. and Straub, D.W. (1999) The Psychological Origins of Perceived Usefulness and Ease-of-Use. Information & Management, 35, 237-250.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00096-2

[47]   Venkatesh, V., Morris, M.G., Davis, G.B. and Davis, F.D. (2003) User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425-478.

[48]   Wang, Y.-S., Cheng, M. and Wang, H.-Y. (2008) Investigating the Determinants and Age and Gender Differences in the Acceptance of Mobile Learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 92-118.

[49]   Smith, P.J., Smith, P.J., Murphy, K.L., Murphy, K.L., Mahoney, S.E. and Mahoney, S.E. (2003) Towards Identifying Factors Underlying Readiness for Online Learning: An Exploratory Study. Distance Education, 24, 57-67.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587910303043

[50]   Yi, M.Y. and Hwang, Y. (2003) Predicting the Use of Web-Based Information Systems: Self-Efficacy, Enjoyment, Learning Goal Orientation, and the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 59, 431-449.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00114-9

[51]   Shih, H.P. (2008) Using a Cognition-Motivation-Control View to Assess the Adoption Intention for Web-Based Learning. Computers and Education, 50, 327-337.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.06.001

[52]   Vroom, V.H. (1964) Work and Motivation. 14th Edition, Wiley, New York.

[53]   Cahill, S.E. and Bandura, A. (1987) Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Contemporary Sociology, 16, 12.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2071177

[54]   Ong, C.S., Lai, J.Y. and Wang, Y.S. (2004) Factors Affecting Engineers’ Acceptance of Asynchronous E-Learning Systems in High-Tech Companies. Information and Management, 41, 795-804.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.012

[55]   Weinerth, K., Koenig, V., Brunner, M. and Martin, R. (2014) Concept Maps: A Useful and Usable Tool for Computer-Based Knowledge Assessment? A Literature Review with a Focus on Usability. Computers and Education, 78, 201-209.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.002

[56]   Byrne, B.M. (2001) Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Mahwah.

[57]   Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., Tatham, R. and Black, W. (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th edition, Prentice-Hall International Inc., Upper Saddle River.

[58]   Kline, R.B. (2005) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd Edition, The Guilford Press, New York.

[59]   Kline, R.B. (2010) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press, New York.

[60]   Krejcie, R.V. and Morgan, D.W. (1970) Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Education and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610.

[61]   Pallant, J. (2005) SPSS Survival Guide—A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows. Open University Press, Chicago.

[62]   Newkirk, H.E., Newkirk, H.E., Lederer, A.L. and Lederer, A.L. (2006) The Effectiveness of Strategic Information Systems Planning under Environmental Uncertainty. Information & Management, 43, 481-501.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2005.12.001

[63]   Arbuckle, J.L. (2009) Amos 18 User’s Guide, 635.

[64]   Chou, T.C., Chang, P.L., Cheng, Y.P. and Tsai, C.T. (2007) A Path Model Linking Organizational Knowledge Attributes, Information Processing Capabilities, and Perceived Usability. Information and Management, 44, 408-417.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.03.003

[65]   Bagozzi, R. and Yi, Y. (1988) On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 74-94.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327

[66]   Holmes-Smith, P. (2001) Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling Using LISREL. ACSPRI Winter Training Program, Perth.

[67]   Creswell, J.W. (2014) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage, Los Angeles.

[68]   Sekaran, U. (2003) Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. 4th Edition, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

[69]   Sekaran, U. and Roger, B. (2013) Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. 6th Edition, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex.

[70]   Blumberg, B., Cooper, D.R. and Schindler, P.S. (2005) Business Research Methods. McGraw Hill, Berkshire, 770.

[71]   Gefen, D., Straub, D.W. and Boudreau, M.B. (2000) Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4, 1-76.
http://www.cis.gsu.edu/~dstraub/Papers/Resume/Gefenetal2000.pdf

[72]   Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981) Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 18, 39-50.

 
 
Top