OJOG  Vol.5 No.12 , October 2015
Transvaginal 3D Ultrasound Evaluation of Post-Cesarean Section Uterine Diverticulum
Objectives: This study focused on evaluating the value of transvaginal 3D ultrasound for the diagnosis and prognostic assessment of post-cesarean section uterine diverticulum. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data from 32 patients with post-cesarean section uterine diverticulum over three recent years. In all patients, transvaginal 3D ultrasound was used to measure the size of the uterine diverticulum and the thickness of the lower uterine segment (LUS) and myometrium. Patients with a LUS with a myometrial thickness under 4 mm underwent resection and repair surgery; those with a LUS with a myometrial thickness over 4 mm underwent hysteroscopic resection. The postoperative sonograms were compared with preoperative images to evaluate the efficacy of various treatments. Results: The mean length, width and depth of the uterine diverticula were 18.30 ± 2.80 mm, 9.14 ± 3.20 mm and 11.49 ± 2.71 mm, respectively. The average LUS myometrial thickness was 3.40 ± 0.80 mm (with a range of 1.6 mm - 6.3 mm). After surgery, two patients’ sonograms still showed diverticula at the post-cesarean section scar, measuring 6 mm × 7 mm × 6 mm and 6 mm × 8 mm × 4 mm. There were significant differences in the size of uterine diverticula between preoperative and postoperative sonograms (P < 0.05) and the effective rate of surgery was 93.75% (30/32). Conclusions: Transvaginal 3D ultrasound is an accurate method for detecting post-cesarean section uterine diverticulum and is helpful for assessing surgical options and prognosis. The LUS myometrial thickness, which is considered as an optional index of post-cesarean section uterine diverticulum, should be measured routinely.

Cite this paper
Li, C. , Mo, X. , Deng, K. , Chen, D. , Gao, X. , Zhai, J. , Liao, Y. , Dai, H. and Cai, X. (2015) Transvaginal 3D Ultrasound Evaluation of Post-Cesarean Section Uterine Diverticulum. Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5, 698-702. doi: 10.4236/ojog.2015.512098.
[1]   Betran, A.P., Merialdi, M., Lauer, J.A., et al. (2007) Rates of Caesarean Section: Analysis of Global, Regional and National Estimates. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 21, 98-113.

[2]   Luo, L., Niu, G., Wang, Q., et al. (2012) Vaginal Repair of Cesarean Section Scar Diverticula. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 19, 454-458.

[3]   van der Voet, L.F., Bij de Vaate, A.M., Veersema, S., et al. (2014) Long-Term Complications of Caesarean Section. The Niche in the Scar: A Prospective Cohort Study on Niche Prevalence and Its Relation to Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. BJOG, 121, 236-244.

[4]   Bij de Vaate, A.J., Brolmann, H.A., van der Voet, L.F., et al. (2011) Ultrasound Evaluation of the Cesarean Scar: Relation between a Niche and Postmenstrual Spotting. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 37, 93-99.

[5]   Monteagudo, A., Carreno, C. and Timor-Tritsch, I.J. (2001) Saline Infusion Sonohysterography in Nonpregnant Women with Previous Caesarean Delivery: The “Niche” in the Scar. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 20, 1105-1115.

[6]   Thurmond, A.S., Harvey, W.J. and Smith, S.A. (1999) Cesarean Section Scar as a Cause of Abnormal Vaginal Bleeding: Diagnosis by Sonohysterography. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 18, 13-16.

[7]   Wu, Q.F., Nie, L. and Zhang, Y. (2011) Clinical Analysis on IVF-ET Treatment of 9 Cases of Post-Cesarean Section Uterine Diverticulum. Journal of Reproduction & Contraception, 22, 183-190.

[8]   Li, N., Wang, Y., Wang, B., et al. (2007) The Partial Survey of Cesarean Section in Hospitals and Health Care Unit in China. Maternal and Child Health in China, 22, 3305-3307.

[9]   Bij de Vaate, A.J., van der Voet, L.F., Naji, O., et al. (2014) Prevalence, Potential Risk Factors for Development and Symptoms Related to the Presence of Uterine Niches Following Cesarean Section: Systematic Review. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 43, 372-382.

[10]   Wang, C.B., Chiu, W.W., Lee, C.Y., et al. (2009) Cesarean Scar Defect: Correlation between Cesarean Section Number, Defect Size, Clinical Symptoms and Uterine Position. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 34, 85-89.

[11]   Uppal, T., Lanzarone, V. and Mongelli, M. (2011) Sonographically Detected Caesarean Section Scar Defects and Menstrual Irregularity. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 31, 413-416.

[12]   Rajiah, P., Eastwood, K.L., Gunn, M.L., et al. (2009) Uterine Diverticulum. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 113, 525-527.

[13]   Osser, O.V., Jokubkiene, L. and Valentin, L. (2009) High Prevalence of Defects in Cesarean Section Scars at Transvaginal Ultrasound Examination. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 34, 90-97.

[14]   Gizzo, S., Zambon, A., Saccardi, C., et al. (2013) Effective Anatomical and Functional Status of the Lower Uterine Segment at Term: Estimating the Risk of Uterine Dehiscence by Ultrasound. Fertility and Sterility, 99, 496-501.

[15]   Erickson, S.S. and Van Voorhis, B.J. (1999) Intermenstrual Bleeding Secondary to Cesarean Scar Diverticuli: Report of Three Cases. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 93, 802-805.

[16]   Evan, P. and Kramer, B. (2008) Uterine Diverticula and Accessory Ducts. AJR, 19, W71.