ALS  Vol.3 No.4 , October 2015
Fluency Differences by Text Genre in Proficient and Struggling Secondary Students
Reading fluency has been found to be an essential component of proficient reading and is a significant part of the Common Core State Standards (CCSS, 2010; NRP, 2000). Previous research has found that students may often differ in their ability to fluently read narrative and informational text. In this study we examine differences in fluent reading by text-genre in a sample of 108 ninth-grade readers. We also investigate these same differences based on whether a student is a proficient or struggling reader. Results for the total sample of readers show that oral reading fluency is more languid when students read informational texts. Additionally, large differences are found when readers are blocked as either proficient or struggling. Instructional implications are discussed.

Cite this paper
Paige, D. , Magpuri-Lavell, T. , Rasinski, T. and Rupley, W. (2015) Fluency Differences by Text Genre in Proficient and Struggling Secondary Students. Advances in Literary Study, 3, 102-117. doi: 10.4236/als.2015.34016.
[1]   ACT (2013). The Condition of College and Career Readiness 2013. Iow City, IA: ACT.

[2]   Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2003). Learning from Traditional and Alternative Texts: New Conceptualizations for the Information Age. In A. C. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher, & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of Discourse Processes (pp. 83-121). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Erlbaum.

[3]   Anderson, R. C., Hiebert, E. H., Wilkingson, I. A. G., & Scott, J. (1985). Becoming a Nation of Readers: The Report of the Commission on Reading. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.

[4]   Anderson, R. C., Wilson, P. T., & Fielding, L. G. (1988). Group Reading and How Children Spend Their Time outside of School. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 285-303.

[5]   Ashcraft, M. (2006). Cognition (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

[6]   Bader, M. (1998). Prosodic Influences of Reading Syntactically Ambiguous Sentences. In J. Fodor, & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in Sentence Processing (pp. 1-46). Dordrecht: Kluwer.

[7]   Best, R. M., Floyd, R. G., & McNamara, D. (2008). Differential Competencies Contributing to Children’s Comprehension and Narrative and Expository Texts. Reading Psychology, 29, 137-164.

[8]   Braten, I., & Oistein, A. (2013). Does Natural Occurring Comprehension Strategies Instruction Make a Difference When Students Read Expository Text? Journal of Research in Reading, 36, 42-57.

[9]   Cervetti, G. N., Bravo, M. A., Hiebert, E. H., Pearson, P. D., & Jaynes, C. A. (2009). Text Genre and Science Content: Ease of Reading, Comprehension, and Reader Preference. Reading Psychology, 30, 487-511.

[10]   Chall, J. S. (1983). Stages of Reading Development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

[11]   Cohen, J. A. (1960). A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37- 46.

[12]   College Board (2014). The 2014 SAT Report on College and Career Readiness. New York: Author.

[13]   Common Core State Standards (2010). Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy in History/So- cial Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects. Washington DC: CCSSOO & National Governors Association.

[14]   Crossley, S. A., Allen, D. B., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Text Readability and Intuitive Simplification: A Comparison of Readability Formulas. Reading in a Foreign Language, 23, 84-101.

[15]   Daane, M. C., Campbell, J. R., Grigg, W. S., Goodman, M. J., & Oranje, A. (2005). Fourth-Grade Students Reading Aloud: NAEP 2002 Special Study of Oral Reading. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences and U.S. Government Printing Office.

[16]   Diakidoy, I., Stylianou, P., Karefillidou, C., & Papageorgiou, P. (2004). The Relationship between Listening and Reading Comprehension of Different Types of Text at Increasing Grade Levels. Reading Psychology an International Quarterly, 26, 55-80.

[17]   Elkind, J. (1998). Computer Reading Machines for Poor Readers. Report 9801, Portola Valley, CA: Lexia Institute.

[18]   Fawson, P. C., Ludlow, B. C., Reutzel, D. R., Sudweeks, R., & Smith, J. A. (2006). Examining the Reliability of Running Records. Attaining Generalizable Results. Journal of Educational Research, 100, 113-16.

[19]   Fields, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.

[20]   Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. C. (2003). Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

[21]   Flesch, R. F. (1951). How to Test Readability. New York: Harper.

[22]   Fodor, J. D. (2002). Prosodic Disambiguation in Silent Reading. In M. Hirotani (Ed.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society (Vol. 32, pp. 112-132). Amherst, MA: GSLA.

[23]   Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral Reading Fluency as an Indicator of Reading Competence: A Theoretical, Empirical, and Historical Analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239-256.

[24]   Goldman, S. R., & Rakestraw, J. S. (2000). Structural Aspects of Constructing Meaning from Text. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 3, pp. 311-335). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

[25]   Graesser, A. C., & McNamara, D. S. (2011). Computational Analyses of Multilevel Discourse Comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 371-398.

[26]   Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2011). Coh-Metrix: Providing Multilevel Analysis of Text Characteristics. Educational Researcher, 40, 223-234.

[27]   Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., Louwerse, M. M., & Cai, Z. (2004). Coh-Metrix: Analysis of Text on Cohesion and lAnguage. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 193-202.

[28]   Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse Comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163- 190.

[29]   Graesser, A., Golding, J., & Long, D. L. (1991). Narrative Representation and Comprehension. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 2, pp. 171-205). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

[30]   Hock, M. F., Brasseur, D. D., Catts, H. W., Marquis, J. G., Mark, C. A. et al. (2009). What Is the Reading Component Skill Profile of Adolescent Struggling Readers in Urban Schools? Learning Disability Quarterly, 32, 21-38.

[31]   Hooley, D. S., Tysseling, L. A., & Ray, B. (2013). Trapped in a Cycle of Low Expectations: An Exploration of High School Seniors’ Perspectives about Academic Reading. The High School Journal, 96, 321-338.

[32]   Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The Simple View of Reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127-160.

[33]   Hopkins, W. B. (2006). A Scale of Magnitudes for the Effect Statistics: A New View of Statistics.

[34]   Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., Espin, C., van den Broek, P., & Deno, S. L. (2003a). Sources of Individual Differences in Reading Comprehension and Reading Fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 719-729.

[35]   Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., Espin, C., van den Broek, P., & Deno, S. L. (2003b). Accuracy and Fluency in List and Context Reading of Skilled and RD Groups: Absolute and Relative Performance. Learning Disabilities: Research and Practice, 18, 237-245.

[36]   Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A Theory of Reading: From Eye Fixations to Comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329-354.

[37]   Kelley, M., & Clausen-Grace, N. (2006). R5: The Sustained Silent Reading Makeover That Transformed Readers. The Reading Teacher, 60, 148-157.

[38]   Kim, J. S., & White, T. G. (2008). Scaffolding Voluntary Summer Reading for Children in Grades 3 to 5: An Experimental Study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 1-23.

[39]   Kucan, L., & Beck, I. (1996). Fourth Grades Thinking Aloud: An Investigation of Genre Effects. Journal of Literacy Research, 28, 259-287.

[40]   Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S.A. (2003). Fluency: A Review of Developmental and Remedial Practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3-21.

[41]   LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a Theory of Automatic Information Processing in Reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293-323.

[42]   Langer, J. A. (1986). Relations between Levels on Prior Knowledge and the Organization of Recall. In M. L. Kamil, & A. J. Moe (Eds.), Perspectives in Reading Research and Instruction. Washington, DC: National Reading Conference.

[43]   Lewin, T. (2014). A New SAT Aims to Realign with Schoolwork. The New York Times.

[44]   McCormick, C., & Samuels, S. J. (1979). Word Recognition by Second Graders: The Unit of Perception and Interrelationships among Accuracy, Latency, and Comprehension. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 11, 107-108.

[45]   Meyer, B. J. F., & Rice, G. E. (1984). The Structure of Text. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 319-351). New York: Longman.

[46]   Milone, M. (2012). The Development of ATOS: The Renaissance Readability Formula. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Renaissance Learning.

[47]   National Center for Education Statistics (2013). The Nation’s Report Card: A First Look: 2013 Mathematics and Reading (NCES 2014-451). Washington DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

[48]   National Governors Association Center and Council of Chief State School Officers (2012). Common Core State Standards Initiative.

[49]   Nelson, J., Perfetti, C., Liben, D., & Liben, M. (2012). Measures of Text Difficulty: Testing Their Predictive Value for Grade Levels and Student Performance. New York, NY: Student Achievement Partners.

[50]   Olson, G. M., Mack, R. L., & Duffy, S. A. (1981). Cognitive Aspects of Genre. Poetics, 10, 283-315.

[51]   Paige, D. D. (2008). An Evaluation of Whole-Class Choral Reading Using Science Text on Oral Reading Fluency in Struggling Adolescents. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Memphis: University of Memphis.

[52]   Paige, D. D. (2011a). Engaging Struggling Adolescent Readers through Situational Interest: A Model Proposing the Relationships among Extrinsic Motivation, Oral Reading Fluency, Comprehension, and Academic Achievement. Reading Psychology, 32, 395-425.

[53]   Paige, D. D. (2011b). 16 Minutes with “Eyes-on-Text” Can Make a Difference: Whole-Class Choralreading as an Adolescent Reading Strategy. Reading Horizons, 51, 1-20.

[54]   Paige, D. D. (2011c). That Sounded Good! Using Whole-Class Choral Reading to Improve Fluency. The Reading Teacher, 64, 435-438.

[55]   Paige, D. D., & Magpuri-Lavell, T. (2011a). Exploring Secondary Literacy Instruction: What Students Need and What Teachers Practice. Unpublished Manuscript.

[56]   Paige, D. D., & Magpuri-Lavell, T. (2011b). Unpacking Adolescent Literacy Skills in a High-Poverty, Urban High School. In T. Morrison, L. Martin, M. Boggs, & S. Szabo (Eds.), Literacy Promises: The Thirty-Third Yearbook, a Double Peer Reviewed Publication of the Association of Literacy Educators and Researchers (Vol. 33, pp. 219-236). Association of Literacy Educators and Researchers: Corpus Christi.

[57]   Paige, D. D., Rasinski, T. V., & Magpuri-Lavell, T. (2012). Is Fluent Expressive Reading Important for High School Readers? Journal of Adult and Adolescent Literacy, 56, 67-76.

[58]   Paige, D. D., Rasinski, T. V., Magpuri-Lavell, T., & Smith, G. S. (2014). Interpreting the Relationships among Prosody, Automaticity, Accuracy, and Silent Reading Comprehension in Secondary Students. Journal of Literacy Research, 46, 123-156.

[59]   Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading Ability. New York: Oxford Press.

[60]   Perfetti, C. A. (1988). Verbal Efficiency in Reading Ability. In M. Daneman, G. E. MacKinnon, & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Reading Research: Advances in Theory and Practice (pp. 109-143). New York: Academic Press.

[61]   Perfetti, C. A. (1990). The Cooperative Language Processors: Semantic Influences in an Autonomous Syntax. In D. A. Balota, C. B. Flores d’Arcais, & K. Raynor (Eds.), Comprehension Processes in Reading (pp. 205-230). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

[62]   Pinnell, G. S., Pikulski, J. J., Wixon, K. K., Campbell, J. R., Gough, P. B., & Beatty, A. S. (1995). Listening to Children Read Aloud. Washington DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.

[63]   Rasinski, T. V. (2010). The Fluent Reader: Oral and Silent Reading Strategies for Building Word Recognition, Fluency, and Comprehension (2nd Edition). New York: Scholastic.

[64]   Rasinski, T. V., Padak, N. C., McKeon, C. A., Wilfong, L. G., Friedauer, J. A., & Heim, P. (2005). Is Reading Fluency a Key for Successful High School Reading? Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 49, 22-27.

[65]   Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., Ashby, J., & Clifton Jr., C. (2012). Psychology of Reading. New York: Psychology Press. Read, S., Reutzel, D. R., & Fawson, P. C. (2008). Do You Want to Know What I Learned? Using Informational Trade Books as Models to Teach Text Structure. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36, 213-219.

[66]   Renaissance Learning (2014).

[67]   Reutzel, D. R., Fawson, P. C., & Smith, J. A. (2008). Reconsidering Silent Sustained Reading: An Exploratory Study of Scaffolded Silent Reading (ScSR). Journal of Educational Research, 102, 37-50.

[68]   Reutzel, D. R., Jones, C. D., Fawson, P. C., & Smith, J. A. (2008). Scaffolded Silent Reading (ScSR): An Alternative to Guided Oral Repeated Reading that Works! The Reading Teacher, 62, 194-207.

[69]   Rupley, W. H., & Slough, S. (2010). Building Prior Knowledge and Vocabulary in Science in the Intermediate Grades: Creating Books for Learning. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49, 99-112.

[70]   Sáenz, L. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2002). Examining the Reading Difficulty of Students with Learning Disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 31-41.

[71]   Samuels, S. J., & Farstrup, A. E. (2006). What Research Has to Say about Fluency Instruction. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

[72]   Schatschneider, C., Buck, J., Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., Hassler, L., Hecht, S. et al. (2004). A Multivariate Study of Factors That Contribute to Individual Differences in Performance on the Florida Comprehensive Reading Assessment Test. Technical Report No. 5, Tallahassee: Florida Center for Reading Research.

[73]   Slowiaczek, M. L., & Clifton Jr., C. (1980). Subvocalization and Reading for Meaning. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 573-582.

[74]   Spiro, R. J., & Taylor, B. M. (1980). On Investigating Children’s Transition from Narrative to Expository Discourse: The Multidimensional Nature of Psychological Text Classification. Technical Report No. 195, University of Illinois: Center for the Study of Reading.

[75]   Stecker, S. K., Roser, N. L., & Martinez, M. G. (1998). Understanding Oral Reading Fluency. In T. Shanahan, & F. V. Rodriquez-Brown (Eds.) 47th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 295-310). Chicago: National Reading Conference.

[76]   Stein, N. L., & Trabasso, T. (1981). What’s in a Story: An Approach to Comprehension and Instruction. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in the Psychology of Instruction (Vol. 2, pp. 213-267). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

[77]   Taylor, S. (2011). Exploring Silent Reading Fluency: Its Nature and Development. Springfield, IL: Thomas. Topping, K. J. (1987). Peer Tutored Paired Reading: Outcome Data from Ten Projects. Educational Psychology, 7, 133-145.

[78]   Topping, K. J. (2005). Trends in Peer Learning. Educational Psychology, 25, 631-645.

[79]   Valencia, S. W., Smith, A., Reece, A. M., Li, M., Wixson, K. K., & Newman, H. (2010). Oral Reading Fluency Assessment: Issues of Construct, Criterion, and Consequent Validity. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 270-291.

[80]   Walther, M., Frazier, L., Clifton Jr., C., Hemforth, B., Konieczny, L., & Seelig, H (1999). Prosodic and Syntactic Effects on Relative Clause Attachments in German and English. Poster Presented at AMLaP 99, Edinburgh, Scotland.

[81]   Weaver, C. A., & Kintsch, W. (1991). Expository Text. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (Vol. 2, pp. 230-245). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

[82]   Wiederholt, J. L., & Bryant, B. R. (2001). Gray Oral Reading Test (4th ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.

[83]   Young, A. R., Bowers, P. G. & MacKinnon, G. E. (1996). Effects of Prosodic Modeling and Repeated Reading on Poor Readers’ Fluency and Comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, 59-84.