The Energy Conservation Paradox of Quantum Physics
Author(s)
V. E. Shapiro*
ABSTRACT
This work asserts that quantum theory runs into a fundamental conflict with the principles of energy conservation inferred from the statistical evolution of interacting systems. The gist is the energy of systems by the principles of Lagrangian mechanics leaves out of account their energy associated with the phase flows of non-invariant phase volume. The quantum theory takes this fact into account, but does that improperly. We show it by presenting insoluble inconsistencies and a case study.
This work asserts that quantum theory runs into a fundamental conflict with the principles of energy conservation inferred from the statistical evolution of interacting systems. The gist is the energy of systems by the principles of Lagrangian mechanics leaves out of account their energy associated with the phase flows of non-invariant phase volume. The quantum theory takes this fact into account, but does that improperly. We show it by presenting insoluble inconsistencies and a case study.
Cite this paper
Shapiro, V.E. (2015) The Energy Conservation Paradox of Quantum Physics. Journal of Modern Physics, 6, 1586-1590. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2015.611160.
Shapiro, V.E. (2015) The Energy Conservation Paradox of Quantum Physics. Journal of Modern Physics, 6, 1586-1590. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2015.611160.
References
[1] Shapiro, V.E. (2008) Physics Letters A, 372, 6087-6093.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2008.08.016 [2] Shapiro, V.E. (2014) Energy Theory: The Vortex Nature of Quantum Physics. Kirensky Institute of Physics, Russian Akad. of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk. [3] Hertz, H.R. (1899) The Principles of Mechanics Presented in a New Form. English Transl, Macmillan, London. [4] Appell, P. (1893-1896) Traité de Mécanique Rationnelle. 4 Vols, 3rd Edition, Gauthier-Villars, Paris. [5] Neimark, Yu.I. and Fufaev, N.A. (1967) Dinamika Negolonomnih Systems. Nauka, Moscow. [6] Graham, R. and Haken, H. (1971) Zeitschrift für Physik, 243, 289-302.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01394858 [7] Heitler, W. (1957) Quantum Theory of Radiation. 3rd Edition, Oxford University Press, London. [8] Coester, F. (1951) Physical Review, 84, 1259.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.84.1259 [9] Watanabe, S. (1955) Reviews of Modern Physics, 27, 26-39. [10] Manley, J.M. and Rowe, H.E. (1956) Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers, 44, 904-913. [11] Dodin, I.Y., Zhmoginov, A.I. and Fisch, N.J. (2008) Physics Letters A, 372, 6094-6096.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2008.08.011 [12] Weiss, M.T. (1957) Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers, 45, 1012-1013. [13] Schulz-Dubois, E.O. and Seidel, H. (1966) Electronics Letters, 2, 24-25. h
ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1049/el:19660019
[1] Shapiro, V.E. (2008) Physics Letters A, 372, 6087-6093.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2008.08.016 [2] Shapiro, V.E. (2014) Energy Theory: The Vortex Nature of Quantum Physics. Kirensky Institute of Physics, Russian Akad. of Sciences, Krasnoyarsk. [3] Hertz, H.R. (1899) The Principles of Mechanics Presented in a New Form. English Transl, Macmillan, London. [4] Appell, P. (1893-1896) Traité de Mécanique Rationnelle. 4 Vols, 3rd Edition, Gauthier-Villars, Paris. [5] Neimark, Yu.I. and Fufaev, N.A. (1967) Dinamika Negolonomnih Systems. Nauka, Moscow. [6] Graham, R. and Haken, H. (1971) Zeitschrift für Physik, 243, 289-302.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01394858 [7] Heitler, W. (1957) Quantum Theory of Radiation. 3rd Edition, Oxford University Press, London. [8] Coester, F. (1951) Physical Review, 84, 1259.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.84.1259 [9] Watanabe, S. (1955) Reviews of Modern Physics, 27, 26-39. [10] Manley, J.M. and Rowe, H.E. (1956) Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers, 44, 904-913. [11] Dodin, I.Y., Zhmoginov, A.I. and Fisch, N.J. (2008) Physics Letters A, 372, 6094-6096.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physleta.2008.08.011 [12] Weiss, M.T. (1957) Proceedings of the Institute of Radio Engineers, 45, 1012-1013. [13] Schulz-Dubois, E.O. and Seidel, H. (1966) Electronics Letters, 2, 24-25. h
ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1049/el:19660019