JSS  Vol.3 No.9 , September 2015
A Comparison of Need within a Social Business Model: Residentially Stable and Residentially Unstable Substance Abusers
ABSTRACT
This study is a mixed design including qualitative and quantitative data gathering for both descriptive and exploratory purposes. The fundamental research question is how do the recovery needs of residentially unstable substance abusers who are provided with transitional housing within a social business model compare with the recovery needs of substance abusers who are not residentially unstable.

Cite this paper
Conahan, J. and MacIntyre, D. (2015) A Comparison of Need within a Social Business Model: Residentially Stable and Residentially Unstable Substance Abusers. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 113-121. doi: 10.4236/jss.2015.39017.
References
[1]   Conahan, J. and MacIntyre, D. (2012) Responding to the Needs of Homeless Substance Abusers. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 6, 153-166.

[2]   Callaghan, R.C. and Cunningham, J.A. (2002) Gender Differences in Detoxification: Predictors of Completion and Re- Admission. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 23, 399-407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0740-5472(02)00302-1

[3]   Moos, R.H., Nichol, A.C. and Moos, B.S. (2002) Risk Factors for Symptom Exacerbation among Treated Patients with Substance Use Disorders. Addiction, 97, 75-85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00063.x

[4]   (1999) Client Placement Criteria. http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/community/pcpc_edition_3/21898

[5]   O’Brien, C.P. and McLellan, A.T. (1996) Myths about the Treatment of Addiction. The Lancet, 347, 237-240. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)90409-2

[6]   White, W.L. and Kurtz, E. (2006) The Varieties of Recovery Experience: A Primer for Addiction Treatment Professionals and Recovery Advocates. In: White, W.L., Kurtz, E. and Sanders, M., Eds., Recovery Management, Great Lakes Addiction Technology Transfer Center, Chicago. http://asi.nattc.org/regcenters/productdetails.asp?prodID=413&rcID=3

[7]   McKeown, S. (2007) Tackling the Housing Needs of Drug Users: Safer for the User, Safer for the Community. Housing, Care and Support, 10, 23-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14608790200700011

[8]   Anderson, T.L., Shannon, C., Schyb, I. and Goldstein, P. (2002) Welfare Reform and Housing: Assessing the Impact to Substance Abusers. The Journal of Drug Issues, 32, 265-296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002204260203200111

[9]   Devine, J.A. and Wright, J.D. (1997) Losing the Housing Game: The Leveling Effects of Substance Abuse. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 67, 618-631. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0080259

[10]   Stahler, G.J. and Cohen, E. (1995) Homelessness and Substance Abuse in the 1990s. Contemporary Drug Problems, 22, 169-191.

[11]   Milby, J.B., Schumacher, J.E., Wallace, D., Freedman, M.J. and Vuchinich, R.E. (2005) To House or Not to House: The Effects of Providing Housing to Homeless Substance Abusers in Treatment. American Journal of Public Health, 95, 1259-1265. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.039743

[12]   Bond, J., Kaskutas, L.A. and Weisner, C. (2003) The Persistent Influence of Social Networks and Alcoholics Anonymous on Abstinence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64, 579-588. http://dx.doi.org/10.15288/jsa.2003.64.579

[13]   Salomonsen-Sautel, S., Van Leeuwen, J.M., Gilroy, C., Boyle, S., Malberg, D. and Hopfer, C. (2008) Correlates of Substance Use among Homeless Youths in Eight Cities. The American Journal on Addictions, 17, 224-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10550490802019964

[14]   Yunus, M. (2010) Building Social Business. Public Affairs, New York.

[15]   McLellan, A.T., Cacciola, J.C., Alterman, A.I., Rikoon, S.H. and Carise, D. (2006) The Addiction Severity Index at 25: Origins, Contributions, and Transitions. The American Journal on Addictions, 15, 113-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10550490500528316

[16]   Rubin, A. and Babbie, E.R. (2008) Research Methods for Social Work. Brooks/Cole, Belmont.

[17]   Creswell, J.W. and Miller, D.L. (2000) Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39, 124-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2

 
 
Top