CE  Vol.6 No.15 , September 2015
Social Capital and Student Achievement: Exploring the Influence of Social Relationships on School Success in Norway and Romania
ABSTRACT
This paper investigates student social relationships in secondary schools and its relationship with student achievement in Norway and Romania. Using data from national youth surveys (“Young in Norway 2010” for Norway and “School Success Profile Survey 2010” for Romania), we explore the concept and measurement of social capital in the school context by applying factor analysis. The paper also tests an analytical model that links student home background, student social capital and student academic achievement, using a structural equation modelling technique (LISREL). Control variables in the analysis are student gender and ethnicity. Testing the analytical model with the two datasets respectively, the results show that student social capital, generated from student social relations with parents, teachers and peers, has a significant influence on student achievement in both countries. Analysis also confirms differences between the two countries in respect to the effect of home background variables and social capital on achievement.

Cite this paper
Huang, L. , Dămean, D. and Cairns, D. (2015) Social Capital and Student Achievement: Exploring the Influence of Social Relationships on School Success in Norway and Romania. Creative Education, 6, 1638-1649. doi: 10.4236/ce.2015.615166.
References
[1]   Agabrian, M. (2007). Relationships between School and Family: The Adolescents' Perspective. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 8, Art. 20.
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0701208 .

[2]   Astone, N. M., Constance, A. N., Schoen, R., and Kim, Y. J. (1999). Family Demography, Social Theory, and Investment in Social Capital. Population and Development Review, 25, 1-31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.1999.00001.x

[3]   Bourdieu, P. (1997). The Forms of Capital. In A.H. Halsey (Ed.), Education: Culture, Economy and Society (pp. 241-258). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[4]   Bowen, G. L., & Richman, J. M. (2001). School Success Profile. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina, School of Social Work, Jordan Institute for Families.

[5]   Bowen, G. L., Rose, R. A., & Bowen, N. K. (2005). The Reliability and Validity of the School Success Profile. Philadelphia, PA: Xlibris Press.

[6]   Buru-Bellat, M. (2004). Social Inequality at School and Educational Policy. Fundamentals of Educational Planning. Paris: IIEP, UNESCO.

[7]   Cabrera, A. F., & La Nasa, S. M. (2001). On the Path to College: Three Critical Tasks Facing America’s Disadvantaged. Research in Higher Education, 42, 119-149.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1026520002362

[8]   Cairns, D. (2014). Youth Transitions, International Student Mobility and Spatial Reflexivity: Being Mobile? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137388513

[9]   Cairns, D., Growiec, K., & Smyth, J. (2013). Leaving Northern Ireland: The Youth Mobility Field, Habitus and Recession among Undergraduates in Belfast. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 34, 544-562.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2012.723869

[10]   Choy, S. P., Horn, L. J., Nuñez, A., & Chen, X. (2000). Transition to College: What Helps At-Risk Students and Students Whose Parents Did Not Attend College? In A. F. Cabrera & S. M. La Nasa (Eds.), Understanding the College Choice of Disadvantaged Students (pp. 241-258). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

[11]   Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 94-120.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/228943

[12]   Dâmean, D., Roth, M., & Hârâgus, T. P. (2010). Social Dimensions of School Success in Romania: A Comparison with USA Data. The International Journal of Learning, 17, 367-380.

[13]   Desjardins, R. (2003). Determinants of Economic and Social Outcomes from a Life-Wide Learning Perspective in Canada. Education Economics, 11, 11-38.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09645290210127462

[14]   Erikson, R., & Jonsson, J. O. (1998). Social Origin as an Interest-Bearing Asset: Family Background and Labour-Market Rewards among Employees in Sweden. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research, Stockholm University.

[15]   Field, J. (2003). Social Capital. London: Routledge.

[16]   Güzel, C. I., & Berberoglu, G. (2005). An Analysis of the Programme for International Student Assessment 2000 (PISA 2000) Mathematical Literacy Data for Brazilian, Japanese and Norwegian Students. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31, 283-314.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2005.11.006

[17]   Harding, D. J. (2003). Counterfactual Models of Neighborhood Effects: The Effects of Neighborhood Poverty on Dropping out and Teenage Pregnancy. American Journal of Sociology, 109, 368-385.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/379217

[18]   Hatos, A. (2008). The Impact of Segregation and Differentiation on School Performance in Grades 10-12: A Multi-Level Analysis (Impactul segregârii si diferentierii asupra performantelor scolare ale elevilor din clasele 10-12: O analizâ multinivel). Quality of Life / Calitatea Vieti, 19, 141-158.

[19]   Hill, P. W., & Rowe, K. J. (1996). Multilevel Modeling in School Effectiveness Research. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 1-34.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0924345960070101

[20]   Hill, P. W., & Rowe, K. J. (1998). Modeling Educational Effectiveness in Classrooms: The Use of Multilevel Structural Equations to Model Students’ Progress. Educational Research and Evaluation, 4, 307-347.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1076/edre.4.4.307.6953

[21]   Hoyle, R. H., & Pantere, A. T. (1995). Writing about Structural Equations Models. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural Equation Modelling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications. London: Sage Publications.

[22]   Hu, S. P. (2003). Educational Aspirations and Postsecondary Access and Choices: Students in Urban, Suburban, and Rural Schools Compared. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 11, 1-13.
http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/242

[23]   Huang, H., & Sebastian, J. (2014). The Role of Schools in Bridging Within-School Achievement Gaps Based on Socioeconomic Status: A Cross-National Comparative Study. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 45, 501-525.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2014.905103

[24]   Huang, L. (2008). How Different Are They? Students Receiving Learning Assistance in the Classroom in Norwegian Secondary Schools. In D. M. McInercey, & A. D. Liem (Eds.), Teaching and Learning: International Best Practice. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Press.

[25]   Huang, L. (2009a). Gender Segregation in Student Career Aspirations in Norwegian Secondary Schools. In D. P. Baker, & A. W. Wiseman (Eds.), Gender, Equality and Education from International and Comparative Perspectives. International Perspectives on Education and Society (Vol. 10, pp. 333-357). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3679(2009)0000010013

[26]   Huang, L. (2009b). Social Capital and Student Achievement in Norwegian Secondary Schools. Learning and Individual Differences, 19, 320-325.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.11.004

[27]   Huang, L. (2010). Peer Relations and Student Achievement in the Norwegian Secondary Schools. The International Journal of Learning, 16, 295-306.

[28]   Husén, T. (1989). Higher Education and Social Stratification: An International Comparative Study. Paris: IIEP, UNESCO.

[29]   Jigâu, M. (Ed.) (2002). Rural Education in Romania: Conditions, Problems and Strategies for Development (Învâtâmantul rural din Romania. Conditii, probleme si strategii de dezvoltare). Bucuresti: MarLink.

[30]   Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Users’ Reference Guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software.

[31]   Krange, O., & Bakken, A. (1998). School Achievement of the Immigrant Youth: Traditional Class Difference or New Dividing Line? (Innvandrerungdoms skoleprestasjoner. Tradisjonelle klasseskiller eller nye skillelinjer?) Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning, 39, 381-410.

[32]   Lauglo, J. (1996). Uphill, but with More Drive? Immigrant Youth in Norwegian Schools (Motbakke, men mer driv? Innvandrerungdom i norsk skole). Rapport 6/98, Oslo: NOVA.

[33]   Lauglo, J. (2008). Family Structures and School Achievements (Familiestruktur og skoleprestasjoner). Tidsskrift for ungdomsforskning, 8, 3-29.

[34]   Lie, S., Kjærnsli, M., Roe, A., & Turmo, A. (2001). Good Results for the Future? Norwegian 15 Years Olds’ Competence in Reading and Science in an International Perspective (Godt rustet for framtida? Norske 15-åringers kompetanse i lesing og realfag i et internasjonalt perspektiv). Rapport 4/2001, Oslo: Institutt for lærerutdanning og skoleutvikling, University of Oslo.

[35]   Lin, N. (2001). Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815447

[36]   Markussen, E., Strømstad, M., Carlsten, T. C., Hausstätter, R., & Nordahl, T. (2007). Inclusive Special Education? On Challenges within the Special Education in 2007 (Inkluderende spesialundervisning? Om utfordringer innefor spesialundervisningen i 2007). Rapport, 19, Oslo: NIFU-STEP.

[37]   McDaniel, A. (2010). Cross-National Gender Gaps in Educational Expectations: The Influence of National-Level Gender Ideology and Educational Systems. Comparative Education Review, 54, 27-50.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/648060

[38]   McDonough, P. M. (1997). Choosing Colleges: How Social Class and Schools Structure Opportunity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

[39]   Meier, A. (1999). Social Capital and Academic Achievement among Adolescents. Working Paper 99-18, Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Centre for Demography and Ecology.

[40]   Miclea, M. (2005). Report on the Current Situation of the Education System (Raport asupra stârii sistemului de învâtâmant). Bucuresti.
http://www.edu.ro/index.php/genericdocs/3590

[41]   Mueller, R. O. (1996). Basic Principles of Structural Equation Modelling: An Introduction to LISREL and EQS. New York: Springer.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3974-1

[42]   OECD, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (2005). Education at a Glance 2005. Paris: OECD.

[43]   Olsen, R. V. (2003). Student and Teacher Behavior. In S. Lie, P. Linnakylä, & A. Roe (Eds.), Northern Lights on PISA: Unity and Diversity in the Nordic Countries in PISA 2000 (pp. 113-122). Oslo: University of Oslo.

[44]   Portes, A. (1998). Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 1-24.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1

[45]   Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

[46]   Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon and Schuster.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990

[47]   Ransdell, S. (2001). Chapter 4: Discussion and Implications. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 391-395.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(01)00035-0

[48]   Ransdell, S., Hawkins, C., & Adams, R. (2001). Chapter 2: Models, Modelling, and the Design of the Study. International Journal of Educational Research, 35, 365-372.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(01)00033-7

[49]   Rowe, K. J. (1997). Factors Affecting Students’ Progress in Reading: Key Findings from a Longitudinal Study. In S. L. Swartz, & A. F. Klein (Eds.), Research in Reading Recovery (pp. 57-110). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

[50]   Sandefur, G. D., & Wells, T. (1999). Does Family Structure Really Affect Educational Attainment. Social Science Research, 28, 331-357.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ssre.1999.0648

[51]   Sandefur, G. D., Meier, A., & Campbell, M. (2006) Family Resources, Social Capital and College Attendance. Social Science Research, 35, 525-553.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2004.11.003

[52]   Sandefur, R. L., & Laumann, E. O. (1998). A Paradigm for Social Capital. Rationality and Society, 10, 481-501.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/104346398010004005

[53]   Schoen, R., Kim, Y. J., Nathoanson, C. A., Fields, J., & Astone, N. M. (1997). Why Do Americans Want Children? Population and Development Review, 23, 333-358.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2137548

[54]   Silova, I., & Magno, C. (2004). Gender Equity Unmasked: Democracy, Gender, and Education in Central/South-Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. Comparative Education Review, 48, 417-442.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/423358

[55]   Stanton-Salazar, R. D., & Dornbusch, S. M. (1995). Social Capital and the Reproduction of Inequality: Information Networks among Mexican-Origin High School Students. Sociology of Education, 68, 116-135.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2112778

[56]   Teachman, J., Paasch, K., & Carver, K. (1996). Social Capital and Dropping out of School Early. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 58, 773-783.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/353735

[57]   Tufis, P. A. (2008). Predictors of School Success in Romania: Family Background, School Factors, and Community Factors. Quality of Life / Calitatea Vietii, 19, 389-405.

[58]   Tuijnman, A. C., & Keeves, J. P. (1997). Path Analysis and Linear Structural Relations Analysis. In J. P. Keeves (Ed.), Educational Research Methodology and Measurement: An International Handbook (2nd ed., pp. 621-633). Oxford: Pergamon Press and Elsevier Science.

[59]   UNESCO, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (2012). World Atlas of Gender Equality in Education. Paris: UNESCO.

[60]   World Bank (2012). World Development Report 2012: Gender Equality and Development. Washington DC: The World Bank.

 
 
Top