[1] Kim, J.-Y., Natter, M. and Spann, M. (2009) Pay What You Want: A New Participative Pricing Mechanism. Journal of Marketing, 73, 44-58.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.1.44
[2] NME Blog (2012) Didradiohead’s “In Rainbows” Honesty Box Actually Damage the Music Industry?
http://www.nme.com/blogs/nme-blogs/did-radioheads-in-rainbows-honesty-box-actually-damage-the-music-industry
[3] Gneezy, A., Gneezy, U., Riener, G. and Nelson, L.D. (2012) Pay-What-You-Want, Identity, and Self-Signaling in Markets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109, 7236-7240.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1120893109
[4] Fahmy, M. and Lee, V. (2009) Singapore Hotel Lets Guests Pay What They Want. Reuters.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/02/04/us-singapore-hotel-idUSTRE5131MA20090204
[5] Uken, M. (2013) Zahle, so viel du willst! Zeit Online.
http://www.zeit.de/wirtschaft/2013-01/pay-what-you-want
[6] Regner, T. and Riener, G. (2012) Voluntary Payments, Privacy and Social Pressure on the Internet: A Natural Field Experiment. DICE Discussion Paper: Vol. 82. DICE, Düsseldorf.
http://www.dice.hhu.de/fileadmin/redaktion/Fakultaeten/
Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche_Fakultaet/DICE/Discussion_Paper/082_Regner_Riener.pdf
[7] Bush, J. (2015) The Humble Visualisations!
http://cheesetalks.net/humble/
[8] Riener, G. and Traxler, C. (2012) Norms, Moods, and Free Lunch: Longitudinal Evidence on Payments from a Pay-What-You-Want Restaurant. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 41, 476-483.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2011.07.003
[9] Gneezy, A., Gneezy, U., Nelson, L.D. and Brown, A. (2010) Shared Social Responsibility: A Field Experiment in Pay-What-You-Want Pricing and Charitable Giving. Science, 329, 325-327.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1186744
[10] ElHarbi, S., Grolleau, G. and Bekir, I. (2014) Substituting Piracy with a Pay-What-You-Want Option: Does It Make Sense? European Journal of Law and Economics, 37, 277-297.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10657-011-9287-y
[11] Kim, J.-Y., Kaufmann, K. and Stegemann, M. (2014) The Impact of Buyer-Seller Relationships and Reference Prices on the Effectiveness of the Pay What You Want Pricing Mechanism. Marketing Letters, 25, 409-423.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11002-013-9261-2
[12] Kunter, M. (2015) Exploring the Pay-What-You-Want Payment Motivation. Journal of Business Research.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.03.044
[13] Jang, H. and Chu, W. (2012) Are Consumers Acting Fairly toward Companies? An Examination of Pay-What-You-Want Pricing. Journal of Macromarketing, 32, 348-360.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0276146712448193
[14] Marett, K., Pearson, R. and Moore, R.S. (2012) Pay What You Want: An Exploratory Study of Social Exchange and Buyer-Determined Prices of iProducts. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 30.
http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol30/iss1/10/
[15] Regner, T. (2014) Why Consumers Pay Voluntarily: Evidence from Online Music. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics.
[16] Jung, M.H., Nelson, L.D., Gneezy, A. and Gneezy, U. (2014) Paying More When Paying for Others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107, 414-431.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0037345
[17] Mak, V., Zwick, R., Rao, A.R. and Pattaratanakun, J.A. (2015) “Pay What You Want” as Threshold Public Good Provision. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 127, 30-43.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.11.004
[18] Dorn, T. and Suessmair, A. (In Press) Is It Really Worth It? A Test of Pay-What-You-Want Pricing Strategies in a German Consumer Behavior Context. Global Business and Economics Review.
[19] Azar, O.H. (2003) The Social Norm of Tipping: A Review. SSRN Electronic Journal, 37, 380-402.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.370081
[20] Biel, A. and Thøgersen, J. (2007) Activation of Social Norms in Social Dilemmas: A Review of the Evidence and Reflections on the Implications for Environmental Behaviour. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 93-112.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2006.03.003
[21] Bohnet, I. and Frey, B.S. (1999) Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behavior in Dictator Games: Comment. American Economic Review, 89, 335-339.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.1.335
[22] Charness, G. and Gneezy, U. (2008) What’s in a Name? Anonymity and Social Distance in Dictator and Ultimatum Games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68, 29-35.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2008.03.001
[23] Hoffman, E., McCabe, K. and Smith, V.L. (1996) Social Distance and Other-Regarding Behaviour in Dictator Games. American Economic Review, 86, 653-660.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/2118218
[24] Andreoni, J. and Petrie, R. (2004) Public Goods Experiments without Confidentiality: A Glimpse into Fund-Raising. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1605-1623.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00040-9
[25] Rege, M. and Telle, K. (2004) The Impact of Social Approval and Framing on Cooperation in Public Good Situations. Journal of Public Economics, 88, 1625-1644.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(03)00021-5
[26] Alpizar, F., Carlsson, F. and Johansson-Stenman, O. (2008) Anonymity, Reciprocity, and Conformity: Evidence from Voluntary Contributions to a National Park in Costa Rica. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1047-1060.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.11.004
[27] List, J.A., Berrens, R.P., Bohara, A.K. and Kerkvliet, J. (2004) Examining the Role of Social Isolation on Stated Preferences. American Economic Review, 94, 741-752.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/0002828041464614
[28] Nunes, J.C. and Boatwright, P. (2004) Incidental Prices and Their Effect on Willingness to Pay. Journal of Marketing Research, 41, 457-466.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.41.4.457.47014
[29] Chang, J.B., Lusk, J.L. and Norwood, F.B. (2009) How Closely Do Hypothetical Surveys and Laboratory Experiments Predict Field Behavior? American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91, 518-534.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2008.01242.x
[30] Dunning, D., Heath, C. and Suls, J.M. (2004) Flawed Self-Assessment: Implications for Health, Education, and the Workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 69-106.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x