OJU  Vol.5 No.8 , August 2015
Cavernous Nerve Graft Reconstruction with a Novel Artificial Conduit during Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy
Abstract: The interposition sural nerve graft has been attempted occasionally during radical prostatectomy for the recovery of continence and erectile function; however, nerve autograft may result in adverse events for the patient. Here, we present our initial experiences using NerbridgeTM, a novel conduit for peripheral nerve regeneration, rather than utilizing sural nerve grafting, in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy to overcome autograft problems such as prolongation of operation time and postoperative abnormal sensation. This novel artificial conduit interposition can be technically feasible when combined with robotic surgery, and prospective randomized controlled trials with high patients-numbers and long follow-up periods are warranted.
Cite this paper: Matsui, Y. , Yamasaki, T. , Inoue, T. , Kamba, T. and Ogawa, O. (2015) Cavernous Nerve Graft Reconstruction with a Novel Artificial Conduit during Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. Open Journal of Urology, 5, 118-122. doi: 10.4236/oju.2015.58019.

[1]   Namiki, S., Saito, S., Nakagawa, H., Sanada, T., Yamada, A. and Arai, Y. (2007) Impact of Unilateral Sural Nerve Graft on Recovery of Potency and Continence Following Radical Prostatectomy: 3-Year Longitudinal Study. Journal of Urology, 78, 212-216; Discussion, 216.

[2]   Saito, S., Namiki, S., Numahata, K., Satoh, M., Ishidoya, S., Ito, A., et al. (2007) Impact of Unilateral Interposition Sural Nerve Graft on the Recovery of Sexual Function after Radical Prostatectomy in Japanese Men: A Preliminary Study. International Journal of Urology, 14, 133-139.

[3]   Sim, H.G., Kliot, M., Lange, P.H., Ellis, W.J., Takayama, T.K. and Yang, C.C. (2006) Two-Year Outcome of Unilateral Sural Nerve Interposition Graft after Radical Prostatectomy. Urology, 68, 1290-1294.

[4]   Kaouk, J.H., Desai, M.M., Abreu, S.C., Papay, F. and Gill, I.S. (2003) Robotic Assisted Laparoscopic Sural Nerve Grafting during Radical Prostatectomy: Initial Experience. Journal of Urology, 170, 909-912.

[5]   Mizuno, K., Inoue, T., Miyazaki, Y., Makino, Y., Terada, N., Kobayashi, T., et al. (2014) Development of a Preoperative Criterion to Select Candidates for Nerve-Sparing Radical Prostatectomy at Kyoto University Hospital. Hinyokika Kiyo, 60, 543-547.

[6]   Montorsi, F., Wilson, T.G., Rosen, R.C., Ahlering, T.E., Artibani, W., Carroll, P.R., et al. (2012) Best Practices in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Recommendations of the Pasadena Consensus Panel. European Urology, 62, 368-381.

[7]   Terada, N., Arai, Y., Kurokawa, K., Ohara, H., Ichioka, K., Matui, Y., et al. (2003) Intraoperative Electrical Stimulation of Cavernous Nerves with Monitoring of Intracorporeal Pressure to Confirm Nerve Sparing during Radical Prostatectomy: Early Clinical Results. International Journal of Urology, 10, 251-256.

[8]   Davis, J.W., Chang, D.W., Chevray, P., Wang, R., Shen, Y., Wen, S., et al. (2009) Randomized Phase II Trial Evaluation of Erectile Function after Attempted Unilateral Cavernous Nerve-Sparing Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy with versus without Unilateral Sural Nerve Grafting for Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer. European Urology, 55, 1135-1143.

[9]   Takenaka, A., Murakami, G., Soga, H., Han, S.H., Arai, Y. and Fujisawa, M. (2004) Anatomical Analysis of the Neurovascular Bundle Supplying Penile Cavernous Tissue to Ensure a Reliable Nerve Graft after Radical Prostatectomy. Journal of Urology, 172, 1032-1035.