FMAR  Vol.3 No.3 , July 2015
Sexual Dimorphism in Adult Human Mandible of North Indian Origin
ABSTRACT
Background: In forensic science the identification of a human is based on three important factors: Age, Sex and Stature. Bones are an important tool for it and among human bones the pelvis and the skull are the most reliable source for sex determination. In the absence of complete pelvis, mandi-ble becomes the important source for sex determination since mandible is the most durable and movable part of skull that can resist postmortem changes. The present study is conducted to assess the accuracy and role of few metric and morphological parameters in determination of the sex of dry adult human mandible of North Indian origin. Material & Methods: The Study is conducted on 50 dry intact human adult mandibles of North Indian origin. The metric parameters i.e. bigonial breadth, bicondylar breadth are measured with a Vernier Calliper by two observers. Non-metric parameters being observed are the morphological features like gonion flaring, muscular markings and shape of angle of symphysis menti. Result & Conclusion: It is concluded that bigonial breadth and bicondylar breadth exhibit the sexual dimorphism. Morphological Parameters: Gonion flaring, muscular markings and shape of angle of symphysis menti also demonstrate the sexual dimorphism. These parameters taken together may determine the sex of adult human mandibles. The present study shows that the mandible is an important tool in the determination of gender with high accuracy.

Cite this paper
Singh, R. , Mishra, S. ,  , S. , Passey, J. , Kumar, P. , Singh, S. , Sinha, P. and Gupta, S. (2015) Sexual Dimorphism in Adult Human Mandible of North Indian Origin. Forensic Medicine and Anatomy Research, 3, 82-88. doi: 10.4236/fmar.2015.33014.
References
[1]   Scheuer, L. (2002) Application of Osteology to Forensic Medicine. Clinical Anatomy, 15, 297-312. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ca.10028

[2]   Giles, E. (1964) Sex Determination by Discriminate Function Analysis of the Mandible. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 22, 129-135.

[3]   Hu, K.-S., Koh, K.-S., Han, S.-H., Shin, K.-J. and Kim, H.-J. (2006) Sex Determination Using Nonmetric Characteristics of the Mandible in Koreans. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 51, 1376-1382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1556-4029.2006.00270.x

[4]   Balci, Y., Yavuz, M.F. and Ca?dir, S. (2005) Predictive Accuracy of Sexing the Mandible by Ramus Flexure. HOMO—Journal of Comparative Human Biology, 55, 229-237.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2004.07.006

[5]   Kim, H.J., Lee, H.Y., Chung, I.H., Cha, I.H. and Yi, CK. (1997) Mandibular Anatomy Related to Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy in Koreans. Yonsei Medical Journal, 38, 19-25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3349/ymj.1997.38.1.19

[6]   Ongkana, N. and Sudwan, P. (2009) Gender Difference in Thai Mandibles Using Metric Analysis. Chiang Mai Medical Journal, 48, 43-48.

[7]   Aitchison, J. (1963) Sex Differences in Teeth, Jaws, and Skulls. Dental Practice, 15, 52-57.

[8]   Ongkana, N. and Sudwan, P. (2010) Morphologic Indicators of Sex in Thai Mandibles. Chiang Mai Medical Journal, 49, 123-128.

[9]   Shamout, A.R., Ammoush, M., Alrbata, R. and Habahbah, A.A. (2012) Age and Gender Differences in Gonial Angle, Ramus Height and Bigonial Width in Dentate Subjects. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal, 32, 81-87.

[10]   Baydas, B., Yavuz, I., Dagsuyu, I.M., Bolükbasi, B. and Ceylan, I. (2004) An Investigation of Maxillary and Mandibular Morphology in Different Overjet Groups. Australian Orthodontic Journal, 20, 11-18.

[11]   Devi, R., Arna, N., Manjunath, K.Y. and Balasubramanyam, M. (2003) Incidence of Morphological Variants of Mandibular Lingula. Indian Journal of Dental Research, 14, 210-213.

[12]   Osunwoke, E.A., Amah-Tariah, F.S., Obia, O., Ekere, I.M. and Ede, O. (2011) Sexual Dimorphism in Facial Dimensions of the Bini’s of South-Southern Nigeria. Asian Journal of Medical Sciences, 3, 71-73. http://www.maxwellsci.com/print/ajms/v3-71-73.pdf

[13]   Krogman, W.M. and Iscan, M.Y. (1986) The Human Skeleton in Forensic Medicine. 2nd Edition, Charles C. Thomas, Springfield.

[14]   Schwartz, J.H. (1995) Skeleton Keyes: An Introduction to Human Skeletal Morphology Development and Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York.

[15]   Heereshchandra and Malaviya, G. (1972) The Sexing of Human Mandible. Journal of the Indian Academy of Forensic Sciences, II, 7.

[16]   Loth, S.R. and Henneberg, M. (1998) Mandibular Ramus Flexure Is a Good Indicator of Sexual Dimorphism. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 105, 91-92.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199801)105:1<91::AID-AJPA9>3.0.CO;2-G

[17]   Indrayana, N.S., Glinka, J. and Mieke, S. (1998) Mandibular Ramus Flexure in an Indonesian Population. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 105, 89-90.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199801)105:1<89::AID-AJPA8>3.0.CO;2-8

[18]   Morant, G.M., Collett, M. and Adyanthaya, N.K. (1936) A Biometric Study of the Human Mandible. Biometrics, 28, 84-122.

[19]   Martin, E.S. (1936) A Study of an Egyptian Series of Mandibles with Special Reference to Mathematical Methods of Sexing. Biometrica, 28, 119-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/biomet/28.1-2.149

[20]   Hanihara, K. (1959) Sex Diagnosis of Japanese Skulls and Scapulae, by Means of Discriminant Function. Journal of Anthropological Society of Nippon, 67, 191-197.

[21]   Kharoshah, M.A., Al Madani, O.M., Galeb, S.S., Zaki, M.K. and Fattah, Y.A. (2010) Sexual Dimorphism of the Mandible in a Modern Egyptian Population. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 17, 213-215.

[22]   Jayakaran, F., Rajangam, S., Janakiram, S. and Thomas, I.M. (2000) Sexing of the Mandible. Anatomica Karnataka, 1, 11-16.

[23]   Franklin, D., O’Higgins, P. and Oxnard, C.E. (2008) Discriminant Function Sexing of the Mandible of Indigenous South Africans. Forensic Science International, 179, 84-85.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2008.03.014

[24]   Ranganath, V., Yogitha, R. and Roopa, R. (2008) Sexual Dimorphism in Mandibular Morphology: A Study on South Indian Sample. South Asian Anthropologist, 8, 9-11.

[25]   Ongkana, N. and Sudwan, P. (2009) Gender Differences in Thai Mandibles Using Metric Analysis. Chiang Mai Medical Journal, 48, 43-48.

[26]   Vinay, G., Gowri, S.R.M. and Anbalagan, J. (2013) Sex Determination of Human Mandible Using Metrical Parameters. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 7, 2671-2673.

 
 
Top