APE  Vol.5 No.3 , August 2015
Prevailing Somatotypes and Their Contribution Rate to the Coordination Abilities among the Students of the Physical Education College
Abstract: This study aimed at identifying the prevailing somatotypes among students according to academic year for males and females, as well as the differences among the frequencies of those prevailing somatotypes. It also aimed at identifying the contribution rates for the somatotype components to the coordinate abilities. A sample of 286 students were chosen, 176 males and 110 females, from the students at the College of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, using stratified random sample method. The results indicated that the Mesomorphic Endomorph somatotype was the prevailing one among males, whereas the Balanced Endomorph somatotype was the prevailing one among females. The results also indicated the existence of differences in the frequencies of somatotypes represented by the prevalence of the Mesomorphic Endomorph somatotype and its difference from the rest somatotypes for both males and females. The study revealed also that the Endomorph somatotype contributed effectively to constant balance and agility among males, whereas the Mesomorph and Ectomorph somatotypes contributed effectively to dynamic balance and agility among females. The researcher recommended the necessity for considering somatotypes when selecting students, who had the Mesomorph somatotype or the Mesomorph and Ectomorph one. He also recommended the necessity of benefiting from this study’s results through informing those concerned to have their mechanism and take the required procedures in order to limit the spread of the Endomorph somatotype among students and improve the Mesomorph through certain training programs.
Cite this paper: Khasawneh, A. (2015) Prevailing Somatotypes and Their Contribution Rate to the Coordination Abilities among the Students of the Physical Education College. Advances in Physical Education, 5, 176-187. doi: 10.4236/ape.2015.53022.

[1]   Allawi, T. ( 2005). Evaluation of Somatotype for a Number of Track and Field Events in Iraq. Journal of Research Basic Education, 2, 222-238.

[2]   Al-Salaimeh, K. (1994). Somatotype and Its Relation to Physical Fitness Level of Students of Faculty of Physical Education in the University of Jordan. MS Theses, Amman: University of Jordan.

[3]   Al-Thaher, S. (2013). Dominant Body Type and Its Ability to Contribute and Predict in Motor Fitness for Students of Teacher-Preparation Institute /Mosul. AL-RAFDEEN Journal of Sports Science, 19, 1-19.

[4]   Arak, M. (2008). Evaluation Some Physical, Skills and Physiological Indicators According to Physical Classifications of Soccer Players Aged (14-17 Years). Ph.D. Thesis, Babylon: University of Babylon.

[5]   Bilge, M., & Tuncel, F. (2003). Investigation of Relationship between Handball Players’ Anaerobic Power and Capacity. Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 8, 68.

[6]   Carter, J. (2002). The Heath—Carter Anthropometric Somatotype—Instruction Manual. Surrey TeP and ROSSCRAFT.

[7]   Claudio, S., Daniel, M., Eunice, O., Henrique, A., & Rita, A. (2014). Body Shifter—Software to Determine and Optimize an Individual’s Somatotype. Procedia Technology, 16, 1456-1461.

[8]   Colakoglu, T., Er, F., Ipekoglu, G., Karacan, S., Colakoglu, F., & Zorba, E. (2014). Evaluation of Physical, Physiological and Some Performance Parameters of the Turkish Elite Orienteer’s, Procedia—Social and Behavioral. Sciences, 152, 403- 408.

[9]   Gualdi-Russo, E., & Zaccagni, L . (2001). Somatotype, Role and Performance in Elite Volleyball Players. Journal of Sports Medicine and physical fitness, 41, 256-262.

[10]   Hassanein, M. (1995). Somatotypes for Male and Female Sports Champions. Cairo: Dar Al Fiker Al Arabi.

[11]   Hassanein, M. (2003). Measurement and Evaluation in Physical Education and Sports (5th ed.). Cairo: Dar Al Fiker Al Arabi.

[12]   Hussein, U. (2004). Somatotypes and Their Effect on Knee Joints Ligaments Injuries of the College of Physical Education Students. Journal of Physical Education, 13, 65-76.

[13]   Ibrahim, W., Hussein, H., & Abdul Amir, R. (2012). The Relationship between Somatotypes and the Performance of Some Ground Movements among Students in the Faculty of Physical Education. Journal of Sports Education, 4, 45-59.

[14]   Liiv, H., Wyon, M., Jurimae, T., Purge, P., Saar, M., Maestu, J., & Jurimae, J. (2013). Anthropometry and Somatotypes of Competitive Dance Sport Participants: A Comparison of Three Different Styles. HOMO—Journal of Comparative Human Biology, 65, 155-160.

[15]   Lundy, B., O’Connor, H., Fiona, P., & Caterson, I. (2006). Anthropometric Characteristics and Competition Dietary Intakes of Professional Rugby League Players. International Journal of Sport Nutrition and Exercise Metabolism, 16, 199-213.

[16]   Muhammed, S., Nasir, A., Yousef, H., & Muhammed, R. (2009). The Role and Importance of Identifying Smatotypes in Evaluation Secondary School Curricula in Algeria. Journal of Sports Sciences, No. 1, 145-158.

[17]   Sogut, M., Muniroglu, S., & Deliceoglu, G. (2004). Investigation of the Young and Male Tennis Players’ Anthropometric and Somatotype Characteristics in Different Categories. Spormetre Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, No. 4, 156.

[18]   Tahillioglu, A., Sevim, Y., Pulur, A., & Alpkaya, U. (2000). Determination of Anthropometric and Somatotype Components at Swimmers. Gazi: Physical Education and Sport Sciences Congress Book.

[19]   Van Someren, K., & Palmer, G. (2003). Predictor of 200m Sprint Kayaking Performance. Applied Journal of Physiology, Nutrition and Metabolism, 28, 505-517.

[20]   Vedat, A. (2013). Somatotypes of Male Whitewater Canoe Athletes of the Turkish National Canoe Team. African Journal of Agricultural Education, 1, 051-055.