Weiren Lin^1*, Osamu Tadai², Manabu Takahashi³, Daisaku Sato⁴, Takehiro Hirose¹, Wataru Tanikawa¹, Yohei Hamada¹, Kentaro Hatakeda²

Show more
¹ Kochi Institute for Core Sample Research, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Nankoku, Japan.
² Department of Marine & Earth Sciences, Marine Works Japan Ltd., Nankoku, Japan.
³ Research Institute of Earthquake and Volcano Geology, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan.
⁴ Graduate School of International and Area Studies, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Seoul, Korea.
Show less

Abstract: Density and porosity are fundamental and important physical properties of rocks in various geological problems, and affect the other physical properties. Therefore, measurements of density and porosity of rock samples are important investigation items in both geo-science and geo-engineering areas. Several measurement techniques of the density and porosity are available and being applied currently. To ensure the data quality and to conduct its quality assessment, comparison of measurement results by different measurement techniques is necessary since the techniques are based on different principles and test procedures. In this study, we collected eight types of rock samples including a gabbro, a granite, four sandstones, a welded tuff and a mudstone as study materials, and also prepared several metal specimens for the experimental comparison. The porosities of the eight rocks covered a very wide range from 0.3% to 50% approximately. We employed three methods (caliper, buoyancy and helium-displacement pycnometer) to measure volumes of regularly-shaped specimens and to determine their bulk densities and porosities. As a result, the three techniques yielded almost same bulk densities and porosities for all the specimens. In addition, we also applied mercury intrusion porosimetry to measure density and porosity as well as to determine pore size distribution of the rock samples. Porosity values obtained by the porosimetry method were underestimated in the case of high-porosity (soft) rock samples and overestimated for the very low-porosity rock samples. Ability to determine pore size distribution, however, is a very important advantage of the porosimetry method.

Keywords: Rock, Density, Porosity, Caliper Method, Buoyancy Method, Helium-Displacement Pycnometer, Mucury Intrusion Posimetry

Cite this paper: Lin, W. , Tadai, O. , Takahashi, M. , Sato, D. , Hirose, T. , Tanikawa, W. , Hamada, Y. and Hatakeda, K. (2015) An Experimental Study on Measurement Methods of Bulk Density and Porosity of Rock Samples. Journal of Geoscience and Environment Protection, 3, 72-79. doi: 10.4236/gep.2015.35009.

References

[1]   Schon, J.H. (1998) Ch. 2, Pore Space Properties: Porosity, Specific Internal Surface, and Permeability, 2nd Edition. Handbook of Geophysical Exploration, Seismic Exploration, Vol. 18, Pergamon, Netherlands, 23-58.

[2]   Franklin, J.A. (1979) Suggest Methods for Determining Water Content, Porosity, Density, Absorption and Related Properties and Swelling and Slake-Durability Index Properties. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science & Geomechanics Abstracts, 16, 141-156.

[3]   Blum, P. (1997) Ch. 2, Moisture and Density (by Mass and Volume), in Physical Properties Handbook: A Guide to the Shipboard Measurement of Physical Properties of Deep-Sea Cores. ODP Technical Notes, 26, 2-1-2-15.

[4]   American Society for Testing and Materials (1999) Standard Test Method for Determination of Pore Volume and Pore Volume Distribution of Soil and Rock by Mercury Intrusion Porosimetry, Designation D 4404-84 (Reapproved 1992). Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 04.08, 588-592.

[5]   Expedition 314 Scientists (2009) Expedition 314 Site C0006. In: Kinoshita, M., Tobin, H., Ashi, J., Kimura, G., Lallemant, S., Screaton, E.J., Curewitz, D., Masago, H., Moe, K.T., and the Expedition 314/315/316 Scientists, Proc. IODP, 314/315/316, Integrated Ocean Drilling Program Management International, Inc., Washington DC.

[6]   Lin, W., Tadai, O., Hirose, T., Tanikawa, W., Takahashi, M., Mukoyoshi, H. and Kinoshita, M. (2011) Thermal Conductivities under High Pressure in Core Samples from IODP NanTroSEIZE Drilling Site C0001. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 12, Q0AD14.