SM  Vol.5 No.3 , July 2015
Depicting Determinants and Effects of Intimacy and Verbal Aggressiveness Target through Social Network Analysis
ABSTRACT
Aim of this research is to suggest determinants and effects of intimacy (including also its extreme forms such erotic relation or life-partnership), measured in term of its effect, attraction, as well as to analyze relations between attraction and verbal aggressiveness. Complete social network analysis has been conducted in a class of students of Physical Education Department, University of Thessaly (N = 53). The data were collected with standardized questionnaires. Network analysis software (Visone) as well as cross-sectional analysis (SPSS) has been implemented. The results are: Attractiveness is gender-specific, as it is connected with male students. Younger students tend to be more attractive in physical appearance and dressing. The mother’s pedagogic influence becomes evident on the attractiveness of someone for life-partnership. The academic conformity is not conducive to the development of pleasant discussions. Spending money for entertainment and impressing try to outweigh attractive physical appearance. Being aware of preference for durable erotic relation strengthens self-confidence. A companionship seems to be of socio-intellectual or of emotional-sexual nature. Attractiveness seems to lead to verbal aggression. It seems also to reduce the tendency to escape to imaginary sceneries. Physical dimension appears to be stronger than mental parameters for maintaining a durable erotic relation. The desire for life-partnership without children appears to be favored by mental elements. Verbal-aggressors search for targets without meticulously examining weaknesses and strengths on each person. Distinct types of attractiveness are also detected, corresponding to the following patterns: general sociability (“friend”) which is also connected with mild (narcissistic) exploitation, erotic relation (“erotic”) which is an autonomous value system based on superficial criteria related to appearance, focusing on communication (“distant communicable”), being an idol (“fully narcissistically exploitable”) without any reality basis, and life-long occupation of a person (“life-long exploitable”).

Cite this paper
Hasanagas, N. and Bekiari, A. (2015) Depicting Determinants and Effects of Intimacy and Verbal Aggressiveness Target through Social Network Analysis. Sociology Mind, 5, 162-175. doi: 10.4236/sm.2015.53015.
References
[1]   Bekiari, A. (2012). Perceptions of Instructors’ Verbal Aggressiveness and Physical Education Students’ Affective Learning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 115, 325-335.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/06.11.16.PMS.115.4.325-335

[2]   Bekiari, A. (2014). Verbal Aggressiveness and Leadership Style of Sport Instructors and Their Relationship with Athletes’ Intrinsic Motivation. Creative Education, 5, 114-121.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.52018

[3]   Bekiari, A., & Hasanagas, N. (2015). Verbal Aggressiveness Exploration through Complete Social Network Analysis: Using Physical Education Students’ Class as an Illustration. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 3, 30-49.
http://dx.doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v3i3.729

[4]   Berscheid, E., & Hatfield-Walster, E. (1969). Interpersonal Attraction. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.

[5]   Bickson, D., & Malkhi, D. (2008). A Unifying Framework of Rating Users and Data Items in Peer-to-Peer and Social Networks. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 1, 93-103.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12083-008-0008-4

[6]   Cook, K. S., & Emerson, R. M. (1978). Power, Equity and Commitment in Exchange Networks. American Sociological Review, 43, 721-739.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2094546

[7]   Edwards, A., & Edwards, C. (2001). The Impact of Instructor Verbal and Nonverbal Immediacy on Student Perceptions of Attractiveness and Homophily. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 12, 5-17.

[8]   Evans, C. (2001). Nominal Rigidities and the Dynamic Effects of a Shock to Monetary Policy. NBER Working Paper 8403.

[9]   Foster, I., Kesselman, C., & Tuecke, S. (2001). The Anatomy of the Grid: Enabling Scalable Virtual Organizations. International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, 15, 200-222.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109434200101500302

[10]   Giddens, A. (1992). The Transformation of Intimacy: Sexuality. Love & Eroticism in Modern Societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.

[11]   Hasanagas, N. D. (2009). Erotic Relation as Power Game: An Essay on Existential Imperialism. The Black Ribbon Campaign.
http://nzmera.orconhosting.net.nz/powrgame.html

[12]   Infante, D. A., & Rancer, A. S. (1996). Argumentativeness and Verbal Aggressiveness: A Review of Recent Theory and Research. Communication Yearbook, 19, 319-351.

[13]   Infante, D. A., & Wigley, C. J. (1986). Verbal Aggressiveness: An Interpersonal Model and Measure. Communication Monographs, 53, 61-69.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637758609376126

[14]   Infante, D. A., Myers, S. A., & Buerkel, R. A. (1994). Argument and Verbal Aggression in Constructive and Destructive Family and Organizational Disagreements. Western Journal of Communication, 58, 73-84.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10570319409374488

[15]   Jordan, G., & Schubert, K. (1992). A Preliminary Ordering of Policy Network Labels. European Journal of Political Research, 21, 7-27.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.1992.tb00286.x

[16]   Katz, L. (1953). A New Status Index Derived from Sociometric Analysis. Psychometrika, 18, 39-43.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02289026

[17]   Kelly, G. F. (1998). Sexuality Today: The Human Perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill.

[18]   Martin, M. M., & Anderson, C. M. (1996). Argumentativeness and Verbal Aggressiveness. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11, 547-554.

[19]   Martin, M. M., Weber, K., & Burant, P. A. (1997). Students’ Perceptions of a Teacher’s Use of Slang and Verbal Aggressiveness in a Lecture: An Experiment. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Communication Association, Balti-more.

[20]   McCroskey, J. C., & McCain, T. A. (1974). The Measurement of Interpersonal Attraction. Speech Monographs, 41, 261-266.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03637757409375845

[21]   McCroskey, J. C., Hamilton, P. R., & Weiner, A. N. (1974). The Effect of Interaction Behavior on Source Credibility, Homophily, and Interpersonal Attraction. Human Communication Research, 1, 42-52.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1974.tb00252.x

[22]   McCroskey, L. L., McCroskey, J. C., & Richmond, V. P. (2006). Analysis and Improvement of the Measurement of Interpersonal Attraction and Homophily. Communication Quarterly, 54, 1-31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01463370500270322

[23]   Myers, S. A. (2001). Perceived Instructor Credibility and Verbal Aggressiveness in the College Classroom. Communication Research Reports, 18, 354-364.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824090109384816

[24]   Myers, S. A. (2002). Perceived Aggressive Instructor Communication and Student State Motivation, Learning and Satisfaction. Communication Reports, 15, 113-121.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08934210209367758

[25]   Myers, S. A. (2003). Argumentativeness and Aggressiveness Research in Instructional Communication Contexts. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Eastern Communication Association, Washington DC.

[26]   Myers, S. A., & Huebner, A. D. (2011). The Relationship between students’ Motives to Communicate with Their Instructors and Perceived Instructor Credibility, Attractiveness. and Homophily. College Student Journal, 45, 84-91.

[27]   Myers, S. A., & Members of COM 200 Creighton University (2003). Perceived Instructor Affinity Seeking and Verbal Aggressiveness in the College Classroom. North Dakota Journal of Speech and Theatre, 16, 9-18.

[28]   Popitz, H. (1992). Phanomene der Macht. Tuebingen: J.C.B. Mohr.

[29]   Rocca, K. A., & McCroskey, J. C. (1999). The Interrelationship of Student Ratings of Instructors’ Immediacy, Verbal Aggressiveness, Homophily, and Interpersonal Attraction. Communication Education, 48, 308-316.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379181

[30]   Skvoretz, J., & Willer, D. (1993). Exclusion and Power: A Test of Four Theories of Power in Exchange Networks. American Sociological Review, 58, 801-818.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095952

[31]   Unal-Colak, F., & Kobak-Uzun, K. (2011). Determining Interpersonal Attraction in Educational Environment and the Relation with Motivation. International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 2, 47-56.

[32]   Vogt, P. R. (1997). Hummock Fields in the Norway Basin and Eastern Iceland Plateau: Rayleigh-Taylor Instabilities? Geology, 25, 531-534.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0531:HFITNB>2.3.CO;2

[33]   Weiss, S. D., & Houser, M. L. (2007). Student Communication Motives and Interpersonal Attraction toward Instructor. Communication Research Reports, 24, 215-224.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08824090701439091

 
 
Top