JSS  Vol.3 No.7 , July 2015
The Dominant Lifestyle Type of University Students in Taiwan
Abstract: Emotional and psychological health is being recognized as one of the key determinants of an individual’s overall wellness. The objective of the study was to detect a sample of university students’ dominant lifestyle type with a focus on emotional aspect of health function. A sample of 280 university students in Taiwan was assessed by the Lifestyle Type Indicator (LSTI). The results indicated that the dominant lifestyle type for the sample of university students was Believer (Type B). A gender breakdown analysis showed that there existed a significant difference between male and female students’ dominant lifestyle type. Achiever (Type A) was the dominant lifestyle type among male students, while Believer (Type B) was the dominant type of female students. Through the extension of the assessment and intervention processes, the study will provide new opportunities for helping college/university students navigate and pursue meaningful life throughout the challenges and transitional phase of their university life.
Cite this paper: Tang, H. , Yin, M. and Chang, K. (2015) The Dominant Lifestyle Type of University Students in Taiwan. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 124-129. doi: 10.4236/jss.2015.37021.

[1]   Lalonde, M. (2002) New Perspective on the Health of Canadians: 28 Years Later. Revista panamericana de salud pública, 12, 149-152.

[2]   Gieck, D.J. and Olsen, S. (2007) Holistic Wellness as a Means to Developing a Lifestyle Approach to Health Behavior among College Students. Journal of American College Health, 56, 29-36.

[3]   Nelson, D.B. (2012) Lifestyle Type Indicators: Cooperate Training Version [Assessment]. Emotional Intelligence Training and Research Institute (EITRI), Emotional Intelligence Learning Systems, Inc., Corpus Christi, TX.

[4]   Ziglio, E., Currie, C. and Rasmussen, V.B. (2004) The WHO Cross-National Study of Health Behavior in School-Aged Children from 35 Countries: Findings from 2001-2002. Journal of School Health, 74, 204-206.

[5]   Wen, C.P., Wai, J.P.M., Tsai, M.K., Yang, Y.C., Cheng, T.Y.D., Lee, M.C. and Wu, X. (2011) Minimum Amount of Physical Activity for Reduced Mortality and Extended Life Expectancy: A Prospective Cohort Study. The Lancet, 378, 1244-1253.

[6]   Ministry of Education, Taiwan (2007) Physical and Hygiene Education: The Happy Program.

[7]   Austin, E.J., Saklofske, D.H. and Egan, V. (2005) Personality, Well-Being and Health Correlates of Trait Emotional Intelligence. Personality and Individual Dif-ferences, 38, 547-558.

[8]   O’Donnell, M.P. (1986) Definition of Health Promotion. American Journal of Health Promotion, 1, 4-5.

[9]   Felce, D. (1997) Defining and Applying the Concept of Quality of Life. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 41, 126-135.

[10]   Witmer, J.M., Sweeney, T.J. and Myers, J.E. (1998) The Wheel of Wellness. Authors, Greensboro.

[11]   Miller, G.D. and Foster, L.T. (2010) Critical Synthesis of Wellness Literature. Faculty of Human and Social Development & Department of Geography, University of Victoria, Victoria.

[12]   Adams, T., Bezner, J. and Steinhardt, M. (1997) The Conceptualization and Measurement of Perceived Wellness: Integrating Balance across and within Dimensions. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11, 208-218.

[13]   Renger, R.F., Midyett, S.J., Mas, S., Francisco, G., Erin, T.D., McDermott, H.M. and Hewitt, M.J. (2000) Optimal Living Profile: An inventory to Assess Health and Wellness. American Journal of Health Behavior, 24, 403-412.

[14]   Nelson, D.B. and Low, G.R. (2003) Emotional Intelligence: Achieving Academic and Career Excellence. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.

[15]   Gandek, B. and Ware, J.E. (1998) Methods for Validating and Norming Translations of Health Status Questionnaires: The IQOLA Project Approach. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 51, 953-959.