Author(s) Gang Dong

Affiliation(s)
School of Economics and Management, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai, China.

ABSTRACT

Considering the major shipper choice factors of potential demand, charge sensitivity and service cost coefficient, the paper analyzes the dynamic evolution of co-opetition mechanism among shipping service resources. A number of interesting results are obtained: when the strategy profile moves from perfectly competition to perfectly co-operation, the optimal charge will increase while the improvement of shipping service is uncertain; because long-term equilibrium state is perfectly competition strategy profile, there is a need for appropriate institutional arrangement to reduce the saddle-point position in order to achieve maximize profit for the overall shipping service resources.

KEYWORDS
Shipping Service, Dynamic Evolution, Co-Opetition Mechanism, Strategy Profile

Cite this paper
Dong, G. (2015) Analyzing the Dynamic Evolution of Co-Opetition Mechanism among Shipping Service Resources. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 51-55. doi: 10.4236/jss.2015.37009.

References
[1]   Song, D.W. (2003) Port Co-Opetition in Concept and Practice. Maritime Policy & Management, 30, 29-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0308883032000051612

[2]   Wang, C.X. and Jiang, L.K. (2009) Cooperation and Competition Strategies among Regional Multiple Ports and Profit Allocation Mechanism. Journal of Shanghai Maritime University, 30, 1-7.

[3]   Li, J.B. and Oh, Y.S. (2010) A Research on Competition and Cooperation between Shanghai Port and Ningbo-Zhoushan Port. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 26, 67-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S2092-5212(10)80012-4

[4]   Saeed, N. and Larsen, O.I. (2010) An Application of Cooperative Game among Container Terminals of One Port. European Journal of Operational Research, 203, 393-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2009.07.019

[5]   Hwang, C.C. and Chiang, C.H. (2010) Cooperation and Competitiveness of Intra-Regional Container Ports. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 8, 2254-2269.

[6]   Mclaughlin, H. and Fearon, C. (2013) Understanding the Development of Port and Regional Relationships: A New Cooperation/Competition Matrix. Maritime Policy & Management, 40, 278-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2013.782966

[7]   Zhuang, W.F., Luo, M.F. and Fu, X.W. (2014) A Game Theory Analysis of Port Specialization-Implications to the Chinese Port Industry. Maritime Policy & Management, 41, 268-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2013.839517