[1] Bardin, L. (2013). The Content Analysis, Collection Quadrige. Paris: PUF.
[2] Baudelot, C. & Establet, R. (2007). What’s New in Girls? Between Stereotypes and Freedoms. Paris: Nathan.
[3] Benaiges, O. (2000). Verbal Communication and Integration of the Teacher to the Class of 6th, Memory Professional, IUFM of the Academy of Montpellier.
[4] Bouchard, P., Saint-Amant, J. C., & Gagnon, C. (2001). Sex Practices in Québec Schools. Canadian Journal of Education, 25, 73-87.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1585742
[5] Cogérino, G., & Lechelard, F. (2003). Social Categorization of Students and Gender Stereotypes in EP? Communication to Study Days of the French Society of Sport Psychology, Paris: Charléty.
[6] Cogérino, G. (2007). About PE Teachers Facing the Mix. Staps1, No. 75, 25-42.
[7] Cogérino, G., & Trottin, B. (2009). Girls and Boys in EPS: Descriptive Approach of Verbal Interactions between Teachers and Students. STAPS Review, No. 83, 70-83.
[8] Combaz, G. (1992). Sociology of Physical Education. Evaluation and Inequalities of Success. Paris: PUF.
[9] Couchot-Schiex, S. (2000). Curricula and Sexual Identity in Physical and Sports Education.DEA in Sciences of Education. Lyon: University of Lyon II.
[10] Couchot-Schiex, S., & Trottin, B. (2005). Interactions Teachers/Pupils EPS: Variations by Gender and Gender. In G. Cogérino (Ed.), Girls and Boys in EPS (pp. 163-179). Paris: Editions of the Revue EPS.
[11] Davisse, A., & Volondat, M. (1987). Mix, Pedagogy and Educational Differences. EPS Review, No. 206, 53-56.
[12] Davisse, A. (2004). The Mix in Question: Review against Foot # 15. EPS and Society Centre, SNEP, 28-31.
[13] De Voe, D. E. (1991). Teacher Behavior Directed toward Individual Students in Elementary Physical Education. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 26, 9-14.
[14] Dubet, D., Duru-Bellat, M., & Vérétout, A. (2010). Companies and Their School. Grasp diplômeet Social Cohesion, Seuil, Paris.
[15] Dunbar, R. R., & O’Sullivan, M. M. (1986). Effects of Intervention on Differential Treatment of Boys and Girls in Elementary Physical Education Lessons. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 5, 166-175.
[16] Duru-Bellat, M. (1995). Girls and Boys in School, Sociological and Psychosocial Approaches: School Construction Differences. French Review of Education, 110, 75-110.
[17] Falzon, P. (1989). Cognitive Ergonomics of the Dialogue. Grenoble: Presses Universitaires de Grenoble.
[18] Felouzis, G. (1997). The Effectiveness of Teachers. Paris: PUF.
[19] Hill, J. D., & Kathleen, M. F. (2006). Classroom Instruction That Works with English Language Learners. Alexandria (Virginie), états-Unis: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
[20] Lebrun, M. (2007). Technologies for Teaching and Learning. Brussels: De Boeck.
[21] Loisier, J. (2009). Educational Communication Guide and Technology Choices in Distance Education. Paper Prepared for the Francophone Education Network Remote Canada (REFAD), Department of Canadian Heritage.
[22] MacDonald, D. (1990). The Relationship between the Sex Composition of Physical Education Classes and Teacher-Pupil Verbal Interaction. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 9, 152-163.
[23] MacDonald, D. (2001). Extending Agendas: Physical Culture Research for the 21th Century. In D. Penney (Ed.), Gender and Physical Education: Contemporary Issues and Future Directions. London and New York: Routledge.
[24] Marro, C. (2012). Dependence/Independence from the Genre: A Relevant Dimension for Thinking Gender Equality beyond Differences. Le Mirail: University of Toulouse.
[25] Marsenach, J., & Merand, R. (1987). Formative Assessment in Colleges. Coll. Research Report NPRI # 2, Paris: NPRI.
[26] McBride, R. E. (1990). Sex-Role Stereotyping Behaviors among Elementary, Junior, and Senior High School Physical Education Specialist. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 9, 249-261.
[27] Merle, P. (2000). The Concept of Democratization of the School Institution: A Typology and Its Testing Period. Population, 55, 15-50.
[28] Merle, P. (2009). The Democratization of Teaching. Paris: La Découverte.
[29] Miyata, C. (2004). The Art of Oral Communication. Montreal: The McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
[30] Moreno, C. (2006). Mixed Forms and EPS Inequalities in Achievement between Girls and Boys. In G. Cogérino (Ed.), The Diversity in Physical Education and Sports. Lyrics, Successes, Differentiations (pp. 40-54). Paris: Editions of the Revue EPS.
[31] Mosconi, N. (1989). The Diversity in Secondary Education: A False Pretense? Paris: PUF.
[32] Mosconi, N. (2001). How Do They Make the Teaching Practices of Gender Inequality? Records of Sciences of Education, 5, 97-109.
[33] Mosconi, N. (2004). Effects and Limits of Co-Education. Work, Gender and Societies, 11, 165-174.
[34] Mosconi, N., & Loudet-Verdier, J. (1997). Unequal Treatment of Girls and Boys. In C. Blanchard-Laville (Ed.), Variations on a Math Lesson (pp. 127-150). Paris: l’Harmattan.
[35] Parker, A. (1996). The Construction of Masculinity within Boy’s Physical Education. Gender and Education, 8, 141-157.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09540259650038824
[36] Ritter, D. (2004). Gender Role Orientation and Performance on Stereotypically Feminine and Masculine Cognitive Tasks. Sex Roles, 50, 583-591.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000023077.91248.f7
[37] Simpson, A. W., & Erickson, M. T. (1983). Teachers’ Verbal and Nonverbal Communication Patterns as a Function of Teacher Race, Student Gender, and Student Race. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 183-198.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312020002183
[38] Skelton, C. (2002). Constructing Dominant Masculinity and Negotiating the Male Gaze. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 6, 17-31.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/136031102753389819
[39] Terret, T. (2004). Sport and Masculinity: A Review of Questions. STAPS Journal, 66, 209.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/sta.066.0209
[40] Vigneron, C. (2006). Inequality of Success in EPS between Boys and Girls: Biological Determinism or School French Manufacturing. Review of Education, 154, 11-124.
[41] Vinson, M. (2013). Under the Dynamic Teaching Nonverbal Interactions, Gender: Analysis of the Joint Action of the Teacher and Students: EPS Two Case Studies. Ph.D. Thesis, Le Mirail: University of Toulouse 2.
[42] Weiller, K. H., & Doyle, E. J. (2000). Teacher-Student Interaction: An Exploration of Gender Differences in Elementary Physical Education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 71, 43-45.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2000.10605112
[43] Wilkinson, I. A. G., & Fungi, I. Y. (2002). Small-Group Composition and Peer Effects. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 425-447.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(03)00014-4
[44] Wright, J. (1997). The Construction of Gendered Contexts in Single Sex and Co-Educational Physical Education Lessons. Sport, Education and Society, 2, 55-72.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1357332970020104
[45] Wright, J. (1999). Changing Gendered Practices in Physical Education: Working with Teachers. European Physical Education Review, 5, 181-197.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1356336X990053002
[46] Wright, J. (2000). Revisiting Gender Equity in Physical Education. Proceedings of the AERA Annual Meeting, New Orleans, 24-28 April 2000, 24-28.