JSS  Vol.3 No.6 , June 2015
Exploring (Inter)Subjectivity and Constructional Changes
Author(s) Xu Yang*
ABSTRACT
Subjectivity is a property of language and it concerns speaker’s expressions of his own evaluation and his imprint shown in an utterance. Inter subjectivity is a derivational form of subjectivity, implicating the speaker’s recognition to the addressee and paying attention to the needs of an addressee’s face and self-image. Subjectivity can prompt the constructional change and bring about constructionalization. This research probes into the politeness realization in daily expressions and proposes that (inter)subjectivity is closely connected with constructional change. Subjectification can be regarded as one of main factors which bring about constructionalization.

Cite this paper
Yang, X. (2015) Exploring (Inter)Subjectivity and Constructional Changes. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 152-157. doi: 10.4236/jss.2015.36022.
References
[1]   Breal, M. (1964) Semantics: Studies in the Science of Meaning (Trans. by Henry Crust). Dover, New York.

[2]   Benveniste, E. (1971) Subjectivity in Language. In: Meek, M. E., Trans., Problems in General Linguistics, University of Miami Press, Coral Gables, 223-230.

[3]   Lyon, J. (1982) Deixis and Subjectivity: Loquor, Ergo Sum? In: Robert, J. and Klein, W., Eds., Speech, Place, and Action: Studies in Deixis and Related Topics, Wiley, New York, 101-124.

[4]   Traugott, E.C. (1992) Subjectification in Grammaticalisation. In: Stein, D. and Wright, S, Eds., Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 31-54.

[5]   Carey, K. (1992) Subjectification and the Development of the English Perfect. In: Stein, D. and Wright, S, Eds., Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 83-102.

[6]   Traugott, E.C. (2003) From Subjectification to Intersubjectification. In: Hickey, R., Ed., Motives for Language Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 124-139.

[7]   Langacker (1990) Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin.

[8]   Finegan, E. (1992) Subjectivity and Subjectivisation: An Introduction. In: Stein, D. and Wright, S., Eds., Subjectivity and Subjectivisation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1-14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1461445604046585

[9]   Traugott, E.C. and Trousdale, G. (2013) Constructionalization and Constructional Changes. Oxford University Press, Oxford. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199679898.001.0001

[10]   Traugott, E.C. (1989) On the Rise of Epistemic Meaning in English: An Example of Subjectification in Semantic Change. Language, 65, 31-55. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/414841

[11]   Traugott, E.C. and Dasher, R.B. (2002) Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[12]   Fitzmaurice, S. (2004) Subjectivity, Intersubjectivity, and the Historical Construction of Interlocutor Stance: From Stance Markers to Discourse Markers. Discourse Studies, 6, 427-448.

[13]   Rawson (1981) A Dictionary of Euphemism and Other Doubletalk. Crown Publishers, New York.

 
 
Top