AASoci  Vol.5 No.6 , June 2015
Cross-National Analysis on Sensitivity to Environmental Quality and Its Change in East Asia
This paper aims to compare people’s sensitivity to environmental change in China, Japan and South Korea across spatial and temporal dimensions by analysing the data derived from a cross-national survey. Based on the analytical results derived from 3907 samples, the consistency of people’s environmental sensitivity on the temporal dimension and the gap on the spatial dimension are clarified. The analysis on the temporal dimension indicates that people are inclined to hold a consistent evaluation toward environmental change, while the analysis on the spatial dimension of environmental sensitivity indicates that people are more sensitive to the deterioration of global rather than domestic environmental change. Data analysis also indicates that Japanese and South Koreans are pessimistic regarding the change of the environment while the Chinese are optimistic. In addition, the attributive features of individuals who are more sensitive to the environmental change are clarified within each country, and the results show that under different social backgrounds, the influence of demographic factors is somewhat dissimilar.

Cite this paper
Chen, Y. and Zheng, Y. (2015) Cross-National Analysis on Sensitivity to Environmental Quality and Its Change in East Asia. Advances in Applied Sociology, 5, 183-194. doi: 10.4236/aasoci.2015.56018.
[1]   Axelrod, L. (1994). Balancing Personal Needs with Environmental Preservation: Identifying the Values That Guide Decisions in Ecological Dilemmas. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 85-104.

[2]   Dietz, T., Stern, P. C., & Guagnano, G. A. (1998). Social Structural and Social Psychological Bases of Environmental Concern. Environment and Behaviour, 30, 450-471.

[3]   Disch, R. (1970). The Ecological Conscience: Values for Survival. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

[4]   Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The “New Environmental Paradigm”. The Journal of Environmental Education, 9, 10-19.

[5]   Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies (Vol. 19). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

[6]   Japan Institute of Statistical Mathematics (2011). The Surveys on the Japanese National Character.

[7]   Merchant, C. (1992). Radical Ecology: The Search for a Livable World. New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall.

[8]   Roth, C. E. (1968). On the Road to Conservation. Massachusetts Audubon, 38-41.

[9]   Roth, C. E. (1991). Towards Shaping Environmental Literacy for a Sustainable Future. Standardization News, 19, 42-45.

[10]   Swan, J. A. (1971). Environmental Education: One Approach to Resolving the Environmental Crisis. Environment and Behavior, 3, 223-229.

[11]   Mohai, P., & Twight, B. (1987). Age and Environmentalism: An Elaboration of the Buttel Model Using National Survey Evidence. Social Science Quarterly, No. 68.

[12]   Stern, P. C. (1992). Psychological Dimensions of Global Environmental Change. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 269-302.

[13]   Van Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1980). The Social Bases of Environmental Concern: A Review of Hypotheses, Explanations and Empirical Evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 44, 181-197.

[14]   Zheng, Y. (2010). Association Analysis on Pro-Environmental Behaviors and Environmental Consciousness in Main Cities of East Asia. Behaviormetrika, 37, 55-69.

[15]   Zheng, Y. (2012). The East Asian Survey on People’s Sense of Culture, Life and Environments (2010-2011). Doshisha Research Center for East Asian Studies.