Back
 OJF  Vol.5 No.5 , July 2015
Forest Tenure and Sustainable Forest Management
Abstract: We reviewed the principles and key literature related to forest tenure and sustainable forest management, and then examined the status of sustainable forestry and land ownership at the aggregate national level for major forested countries. The institutional design principles suggested by Ostrom are well accepted for applications to public, communal, and private lands. The analyses of countries as a whole suggest that problems of forest land loss and sustainable forest management are related to the amount of public lands owned, as well as the difference between developed and developing countries. Developed countries have largely achieved a stable level of land use and resource extraction after centuries of exploitation of forests and natural resources. Many developed countries do have greater amounts of private forest land than developing countries, which have occurred as the countries transfer lands to private owners in the course of development. Public lands and management approaches require diligence, but can be developed to meet the design criteria suggested by tenure rights theorists. Private or communal ownership is often considered superior, but also must meet the criteria suggested above in order to foster sustainable forest management in poor countries.
Cite this paper: Siry, J. , McGinley, K. , Cubbage, F. and Bettinger, P. (2015) Forest Tenure and Sustainable Forest Management. Open Journal of Forestry, 5, 526-545. doi: 10.4236/ojf.2015.55046.
References

[1]   Alchian, A., & Demsetz, H. (1973). The Property Rights Paradigm. The Journal of Economic History, 33, 16-27.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700076403

[2]   Andersson, K., & Gibson, C. (2007). Decentralized Governance and Environmental Change: Local Institutional Moderation of Deforestation in Bolivia. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26, 99-123.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pam.20229

[3]   Bauch, S., Sills, E., Rodriguez, L. C. E., McGinley, K., & Cubbage, F. W. (2009). Forest Policy Reform in Brazil. Journal of Forestry, 107, 132-138.

[4]   Bocco, G., Rosete, F., Bettinger, P., & Velázquez, A. (2001). Developing a GIS Program in Rural Mexico. Journal of Forestry, 99, 14-19.

[5]   Bromley, D. (1991). Environment and Economy: Property Rights and Public Policy. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.

[6]   Bruce, J. W. (1998). Review of Tenure Terminology. Tenure Brief, 1, 8.

[7]   Butler, B. (2008). Family Forest Owners of the United States, 2006. USDA Forest Service.

[8]   Canadell, J. G., & Raupach, M. R. (2008). Managing Forests for Climate Change Mitigation. Science, 320, 1456-1457.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1155458

[9]   Carle, J., & Holmgren, P. (2008). Wood from Planted Forests: A Global Outlook 2005-2030. Forest Products Journal, 58, 6-18.

[10]   Cashore, B., Galloway, G., Cubbage, F., Humphreys, D., Katila, P., Levin, K., Maryudi, A. et al. (2010). Ability of Institutions to Address New Challenges. In G. Merry, P. Katila, G. Gallowey, R. I. Alfaro, M. Kanninen, M. Lobovikow, & J. Varjo (Eds.), Forests and Society—Responding to Global Drivers of Change (IUFRO World Series 2010, Vol. 25, pp. 441-486). Vienna: IUFRO.

[11]   Charnley, S., & Poe, M. R. (2007). Community Forestry in Theory and Practice: Where Are We Now? Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 301-336.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123143

[12]   Coleman, E. A. (2009). Institutional Factors Affecting Biophysical Outcomes in Forest Management. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 28, 122-146.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pam.20405

[13]   Coleman, E. A., & Steed, B. C. (2009). Monitoring and Sanctioning in the Commons: An Application to Forestry. Ecological Economics, 68, 2106-2113.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.006

[14]   Cox, M., Arnold, G., & Villamayor, S. (2010). A Review of Design Principles for Community-Based Natural Resource Management. Ecology and Society, 15, 4-38.

[15]   Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003). The Struggle to Govern the Commons. Science, 302, 1907-1912.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1091015

[16]   Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2002). Land Tenure and Rural Development, FAO Land Tenure Studies. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

[17]   Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2010). Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010, FAO Forestry Paper 163. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

[18]   Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2011). Reforming Forest Tenure: Issues, Principles and Process, FAO Forestry Paper 165. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

[19]   Gautam, A., & Shivakot, G. (2008). Evolution, Impacts, and Challenges of Community-Based Forestry in Nepal. In E. L. Web, & G. P. Shivakot (Eds.), Decentralization, Forests, and Rural Communities. New Delhi: Sage Publications.

[20]   Geist, H. J., & Lambin, E. F. (2002). Proximate Causes and Underlying Forces of Tropical Deforestation. BioScience, 52, 143-150.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2002)052[0143:PCAUDF]2.0.CO;2

[21]   Godoy, R., Jacobson, M., De Castro, J., Aliaga, V., Romero, J., & Davis, A. (1998). The Role of Tenure Security and Private Time Preference in Neotropical Deforestation. Land Economics, 74, 162-170.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3147048

[22]   Grafton, R. Q. (2000). Governance of the Commons: A Role for the State? Land Economics, 76, 504-517.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3146949

[23]   Grossman, G., & Kruger, A. (1995). Economic Growth and the Environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 353-377.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2118443

[24]   Hardin, G. (1968). Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162, 1243-1248.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243

[25]   Heritage Foundation (2011). 2011 Index of Economic Freedom. Washington DC: Heritage Foundation.

[26]   Karsenty, A., Drigo, I., Piketty, M., & Singer, B. (2008). Regulating Industrial Forest Concessions in Central Africa and South America. Forest Ecology and Management, 256, 1498-1508.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.07.001

[27]   Katila, P. (2008). Devolution of Forest-Related Rights: Comparative Analysis of Six Developing Countries, Tropical Forestry Reports 33. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Vikki Tropical Resources Institute.

[28]   Kauppi, P. E., Ausubel, J. H., Fang, J., Mather, A. S., Sedjo, R. A., & Waggoner, P. E. (2006). Returning Forests Analyzed with the Forest Identity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 17574-17579.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0608343103

[29]   Klooster, D., & Masera, O. (2000). Community Forest Management in Mexico: Carbon Mitigation and Biodiversity Conservation through Rural Development. Global Environmental Change, 10, 259-272.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00033-9

[30]   Larson, A. M., Cronkleton, P., Barry, D., & Pacheco, P. (2008). Tenure Rights and Beyond: Community Access to Forest Resources in Latin America. Bogor: Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR).

[31]   Lister, J. (2011). Corporate Social Responsibility and the State: International Approaches to Forest Co-Regulation. Vancouver: UBC Press.

[32]   Lynch, O. (2011a). Wither the People? Demographic, Tenurial and Agricultural Aspects of the Tropical Forestry Action Plan. Washington DC: World Resources Institute.

[33]   Lynch, O. (2011b). Mandating Recognition: International Law and Native/Aboriginal Title. Washington DC: The Rights and Resources Initiative.

[34]   Mendelsohn, R. (1994). Property Rights and Tropical Deforestation. Oxford Economic Papers, New Series, 46, 750-756.

[35]   Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763

[36]   Ostrom, E. (2000). Private and Common Property Rights. In B. Boudewijn, & G. De Geest (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Vol. II. Civil Law and Economic. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

[37]   Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

[38]   Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond Markets and States: Polycentric Governance of Complex Economic Systems. American Economic Review, 100, 641-672.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641

[39]   Ostrom, E., & Hess, C. (2007). Private and Common Property Rights. Bloomington, IN: Social Science Electronic Publishing Inc.

[40]   Pacheco, P., Barry, D., Cronkleton, P., & Larson, A.M. (2008). The Role of Informal Institutions in the Use of Forest Resources in Latin America, Forests and Governance Program Paper 15. Bogor: CIFOR.

[41]   Parviainen, J., Vastila, S., & Suominen, S. (2010). Finnish Forests and Forest Management. In Finland’s Forests in Changing Climate, Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute, No. 159. Vantaa: Finnish Forest Research Institute.

[42]   Repetto, R., & Gilles, M. (1998). Public Policies and the Misuse of Forest Resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[43]   RRI, & ITTO (2009). Tropical Forest Tenure Assessment: Trends, Challenges and Opportunities. Washington DC: Rights and Resources Initiative.

[44]   Rudel, T. K. (1998). Is There a Forest Transition? Deforestation, Reforestation, and Development. Rural Sociology, 63, 533-552.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1998.tb00691.x

[45]   Schlager, E., & Ostrom, E. (1992). Property-Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis. Land Economics, 68, 249-262.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3146375

[46]   Schmithüsen, F., & Hirsch, F. (2010). Private Forest Ownership in Europe, Geneva Timber and Forest Study Paper 26. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe/Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

[47]   Siry, J. (2003). Today and Tomorrow of Private Forestry in Central and Eastern Europe. In L. Teeter, B. Cashore, & D. Zhang (Eds.), Forest Policy for Private Forestry: Global and Regional Challenges (pp. 81-93). Wallingford: CABI Publishing.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1079/9780851995991.0081

[48]   Siry, J., Cubbage, F., Newman, D., & Izlar, B. (2010). Forest Ownership and Management Outcomes in the U.S., in Global Context. International Forestry Review, 12, 38-48.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1505/ifor.12.1.38

[49]   Smith, W. B., Miles, P. D., Perry, C. H., & Pugh, S. A. (2009). Forest Resources of the United States, 2007, General Technical Report WO-78. Washington DC: USDA Forest Service, Washington Office.

[50]   Stroup, R. (1998). Privatizing Public Lands: Market Solutions to Economic and Environmental Problems. The Public Land & Resources Law Review, 19, 79-101.

[51]   Stroup, R., & J. Baden. (1973). Externality, Property Rights, and the Management of Our National Forests. Journal of Law and Economics, 16, 303-312.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/466768

[52]   Sunderlin, W., Hatchers, J. & Liddle, M. (2008). From Exclusion to Ownership? Challenges and Opportunities in Advanced Forest Tenure Reforms. Washington DC: Rights and Resources Initiative.

[53]   Tacconi, L. (2007). Decentralization, Forests and Livelihoods: Theory and Narrative. Global Environmental Change, 17, 338-348.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.01.002

[54]   Terborgh, J., & Peres, C. A. (2002). Indigenous People and Protected Areas. In J. Terborgh, R. van Schaik, & L. Davenport (Eds.), Making Parks Work, Strategies for Preserving Tropical Nature. Washington DC: Island Press.

[55]   Tucker, C. M. (2010). Learning on Governance in Forest Ecosystems: Lessons from Recent Research. International Journal of the Commons, 4, 687-706.

[56]   White, A., & Martin, A. (2002). Who Owns the World’s Forests? Forest Tenure and Public Forests in Transition. Washington DC: Forest Trends.

 
 
Top