JSSM  Vol.8 No.3 , June 2015
Analysis of Tourist Leisure Activities in Integrated Resorts Based on the Constraint Negotiation Strategies
ABSTRACT
Based on the Constraint Negotiation Strategies, this study aims to explore whether three types of constraint factors and their hierarchy relations can be applied to Chinese tourists. The subject of this study is the leisure activities of Chinese tourists taking a leisure vacation. The study tends to figure out the main constraint factors and their corresponding negotiation strategies. The authors conduct confirmatory factor analysis to the data collected and also perform the Structural Equation Model to test the Constraint Negotiation Model and its hypotheses. The results show that structural constraints have a significant influence on participation to leisure activities. Driven by motivation to have a leisure vacation, tourists choose ReBAM as their negotiation strategy to fulfill their need of participating in leisure activities. While still maintaining some very special features of its own, leisure tourism in China is gradually merging with the international trend for tourism development.

Cite this paper
Zhong, Z. , Luo, J. and Zhang, M. (2015) Analysis of Tourist Leisure Activities in Integrated Resorts Based on the Constraint Negotiation Strategies. Journal of Service Science and Management, 8, 339-348. doi: 10.4236/jssm.2015.83036.
References
[1]   Wang, G.X. (1998) Development and Management of Tourist Holiday Resorts in the Country. Tourism Tribune, 4, 38-40.

[2]   Zhou, J.M. (2003) The Development Trend of the Tourist Holiday Resort. Urban Planning Overseas, 18, 25-29.

[3]   Jia, Z.H., Zhao, Z.H. and Zhang, L. (2005) Comparative Analysis on Research about Domestic and International Tourism Resorts. Journal of Guilin Institute of Tourism, 16, 45-48.

[4]   Yang, Z.Z. (2010) Introduction to the Study of Holiday-Making: Providing References for the Construction of Hainan International Tourism Island. Tourism Tribune, 25, 12-29.

[5]   Jackson, E.L. (2000) Will Research on Leisure Constraints Still Be Relevant in the Twenty-First Century? Journal of Leisure Research, 32, 62-68.

[6]   Crawford, D.W. and Godbey, G. (1987) Reconceptualizing Barriers to Family Leisure. Leisure Sciences, 9, 119-127.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01490408709512151

[7]   Crawford, D.W, Jackson, E.L. and Godbey, G. (1991) A Hierarchical Model of Leisure Constraints. Leisure Sciences, 13, 309-320.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01490409109513147

[8]   Jackson, E.L., Crawford, D.W. and Godbey, G. (1993) Negotiation of Leisure Constraints. Leisure Sciences, 15, 1-11.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01490409309513182

[9]   Jackson, E.L. and Rucks, V.C. (1995) Negotiation of Leisure Constraints by Junior-High and High-School Students: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Leisure Research, 27, 85-105.

[10]   Fleischer, A. and Pizam, A. (2002) Tourism Constraints among Israeli Seniors. Annals of Tourism Research, 29, 106-123.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0160-7383(01)00026-3

[11]   Daniels, M.J., Drogin Rodgers, E.B. and Wiggins, B.P. (2005) “Travel Tales”: An Interpretive Analysis of Constraints and Negotiations to Pleasure Travel as Experienced by Persons with Physical Disabilities. Tourism Management, 26, 919-930.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2004.06.010

[12]   Metcalf, E.C., Burns, R.C. and Graefe, A.R. (2013) Understanding Non-Traditional Forest Recreation: The Role of Constraints and Negotiation Strategies among Racial and Ethnic Minorities. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 1, 29-39.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jort.2013.04.003

[13]   Lin, L. and Shi, L.Y. (2012) Progress and Enlightenments of Foreign Leisure Constraints Research. Progress in Geography, 31, 1377-1389.

[14]   Zhang, H.L., Zhang, J., Cheng, S.W., Lu, S.J. and Shi, C.Y. (2012) Role of Constraints in Chinese Calligraphic Landscape Experience: An Extension of a Leisure Constraints Model. Tourism Management, 33, 1398-1407.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2012.01.001

[15]   Hudson, S. (2000) The Segmentation of Potential Tourists: Constraint Differences between Men and Women. Journal of Travel Research, 38, 363-368.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004728750003800404

[16]   Lai, C.T., Li, X. and Harrill, R. (2013) Chinese Outbound Tourists Perceived Constraints to Visiting the United States. Tourism Management, 37, 136-146.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.01.014

[17]   Ning, Z.Q., Zhao, P. and Luo, Z.P. (2009) An Analysis of the Leisure Behaviors of Beijing Residents with Different Occupations under the Background of the Transformation. Tourism Tribune, 24, 46-52.

[18]   Mai, X.P. (2013) Sports Leisure Behaviors and Leisure Value Orientations of College Students in Guangdong Province. Journal of Physical Education, 20, 73-75.

[19]   Zhu, F. and Su, Q. (2010) A Review of Study on Foreign Tourist Resort. Tourism Forum, 3, 453-458.

[20]   Wu, B.H. (2001) A Study on Recreational Belt around Metropolis (ReBAM): Shanghai Case. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 21, 354-359.

[21]   Hubbard, J. and Mannell, R.C. (2001) Testing Competing Models of the Leisure Constraint Negotiation Process in a Corporate Employee Recreation Setting. Leisure Sciences, 23, 145-163.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/014904001316896846

[22]   Wilhelm Stanis, S.A., Schneider, I.E. and Russell, K.C. (2009) Leisure Time Physical Activity of Park Visitors: Retesting Constraint Models in Adoption and Maintenance Stages. Leisure Sciences, 31, 287-304.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01490400902837886

[23]   Son, J.S., Mowen, A.J. and Kerstetter, D.L. (2008) Testing Alternative Leisure Constraint Negotiation Models: An Extension of Hubbard and Mannell’s Study. Leisure Sciences, 30, 198-216.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01490400802017308

[24]   White, D.D. (2008) A Structural Model of Leisure Constraints Negotiation in Outdoor Recreation. Leisure Sciences, 30, 342-359.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01490400802165131

[25]   Chick, G. and Dong, E.W. (2012) An Ethnographic Analysis of Leisure Constraints in Six Chinese Cities. Journal of Zhejiang University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 42, 44-67.

 
 
Top