JMP  Vol.6 No.7 , June 2015
Breakdown of Kidney and Ureteral Stones Using Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Zakho City
ABSTRACT
In the present study, investigation of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in Zakho City for breakdown kidney and ureteral stones has been carried out. The data were collected from the center of breakdown kidney stones in Zakho hospital. A total of 34 patients (25 male and 9 female) of ages ranged from 20 - 60 years were treated with ESWL. The patient harboring 24 renal stones and 10 ureteral stones of size ranged from 7 to 23 mm of almost patients are 8 mm and composed of calcium oxalate. The study has been conducted taking in to consideration the parameters (type, sizes, composition and location of stone as well as region and ages of patients, also power, number of shock wave and session). The results show that the number of shock wave decreases nearly exponentially with the ages of patients for calcium oxalate stone of size 8 mm under constant power 4 watt while it tends to increase according to increasing stones size for the patients of ages 20 - 30 years. The size of calcium oxalate stones decreases nearly exponentially with the patients’ ages for workers in Zakho city. Also for same size 8 mm of (calcium, phosphate, and oxalate) stones and different regions of zakho city, the number of shock waves decreases according to increasing ages of patients. Contrary to that for certain size of stones 8 mm, the number of shock wave starts to increase from uric acid to maximum value for calcium oxalate stone for the adult patients of age’s 22 up to 30 years. However for elders ages 30 - 60 years and different regions, the size of renal and ureteric stones increases from the minimum value for calcium, phosphate, oxalate to maximum value for calcium oxalate stone only. Uric acid stone requires minimum power to break, while the calcium oxalate needs maximum power to fragment due to its hardness composition. Later number of session of shock wave required for crushing each stones size increases according to increasing its size while its variation due to enhancing patients ages for calcium oxalate of size 8 mm results in nearly a decreasing exponential behavior.

Cite this paper
Al-Hakary, S. (2015) Breakdown of Kidney and Ureteral Stones Using Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy in Zakho City. Journal of Modern Physics, 6, 869-877. doi: 10.4236/jmp.2015.67091.
References
[1]   Herdman, R.C. (1984) Effects of Federal “Policies on Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy” Is Case Study 36 in OTA’S Health Technology Case Study Series. OTA Health and Life Sciences Division.

[2]   Lingeman, J.E. (1997) Urologic Clinics of North America, 24, 185-211.

[3]   Costa-Bauza, A., Perello, J., Isern, B. and Grases, F. (2005) Urological Research, 33, 51-56.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0094-0143(05)70363-3

[4]   Hossain, M.J., Uddin, M.N. and Islam, M.S. (2009) CMCTA, 20, 45-49.

[5]   Weinberg, K. and Ortiz, M. (2009) Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology, 8, 285-299.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-008-0135-0

[6]   Tomescu, P., Panus, A., Mitroi, G., Dragoescu, O., Stoica, L., Dena, S. and Enache, M. (2009) Current Health Sciences Journal, 35.

[7]   Wang, C.-J. (2012) Surgery and Research, 7, 11.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-7-11

[8]   Abid, A.F. (2014) Open Journal of Urology, 4, 26-32.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oju.2014.43005

[9]   Junuzovic, D., Prstojevic, J.K., Hasanbegovic, M. and Lepara, Z. (2014) Acta Informatica Medica, 22, 309-314.
http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/aim.2014.22.309-314

[10]   Sauerbruch, T., Holi, J., Sackmann, M. and Paumgartner, G. (2015) Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy of Pancreatic Stones.
http://gut.bmj.com/

[11]   Gallagher, H.J. and Tolley, D.A. (2000) Current Opinion in Urology, 10, 551-555.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00042307-200011000-00003

[12]   Grasso, M., Hsu, J. and Spaliviero, M. (2008) Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy. eMedicine by WebMD.

[13]   Manu, R. (1998) Litotripsia extracorporeala cu unde de soc (ESWL). In Urologie Clinica, Editura Medicala Amaltea, Bucuresti, 162-164.

[14]   Tiselius, H.G., Ackermann, D., Alken, P., Buck, C., Conort, P. and Galluci, M. (2001) European Urology, 40, 362-371.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000049803

[15]   Yang, H.S., Park, K.S. and Min, B.K. (1993) Korean Journal of Urology, 34, 109-115.

[16]   Argyropoulus, A.N. and Tolley, D.A. (2007) European Urology, 52, 344-350.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2007.04.066

[17]   Tarawneh, E., Awad, Z., Hani, A., Haroun, A.A., Hadidy, A., Mahafza, W., et al. (2010) Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation, 21, 660-665.

[18]   Kovacevic-Prstojevic, J. (2014) Broj vantjelesnih razbijanja kamenaca u odnosu na velicinu kamenca, njegovu lokalizaciju u urinarnom traktu, temorfolosku strukturu kamenca. Magistarski rad. Medicinski fakultet Univerziteta u Sarajevu, Sarajevo.

[19]   Salam, M.S. (2003) Principle and Practice of Urology. Brown Walker Press, Boca Raton, 721.

[20]   Ng, C.-F., Wong, A. and Tolley, D. (2007) BJU International, 100, 392-395.

 
 
Top