OJER  Vol.4 No.2 , May 2015
Sensitivity Analysis of Buried Jointed Pipelines Subjected to Earthquake Waves
Abstract: In this study, a number of nonlinear time-history dynamic analyses are conducted on a part of Tehran water distribution network to investigate its functionality during transient large ground motions. The network is of 950-meter length, consisting of ductile iron pipes segments of 6-meter length. Pipes are modeled using beam elements and springs characterize the connections. Considering the time lag between support inputs, and the nonlinear soil-pipe interaction, by scaling the amplitude of the Tab as earthquake record, incremental dynamic analysis is carried out on the network in two orthogonal directions and the sensitivity of the network response is examined. Furthermore, the effects of variations in soil damping and soil spring stiffness are also studied in the network analysis. Finally the effect of changes in angle between incoming wave and pipeline is considered on a simplified network. Results show that the points other than critical ones at network intersections remain almost intact and when the angle of incidence is 30 degrees the stress and rotation peak.
Cite this paper: Boorboor, A. and Hosseini, M. (2015) Sensitivity Analysis of Buried Jointed Pipelines Subjected to Earthquake Waves. Open Journal of Earthquake Research, 4, 74-84. doi: 10.4236/ojer.2015.42007.

[1]   O’Rourke, M.J. and Liu, X. (1999) Response of Buried Pipelines Subjected to Earthquake Effect. MCEER Report.

[2]   Takada, S., Hassani, N. and Rasti, R. (2003) Artificial Neural Network (ANN) Modeling for Earthquake Damage Detection in Water Distribution System. Proceedings of the 2003 Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering [Electronic Resource], 9 p.

[3]   Jayaram, N. and Baker, J.W. (2009) Efficient Sampling and Data Reduction Techniques for Probabilistic Seismic Lifeline Risk Assessment. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 39, 1109-1131.

[4]   Toprak, S. and Taskin, F. (2007) Estimation of Earthquake Damage to Buried Pipelines Caused by Ground Shaking. Natural Hazards, 40, 1-24.

[5]   Shi, P., O’Rourke, T.D., Wang, Y. and Fan, K. (2008) Seismic Response of Buried Pipelines to Surface Wave Propagation Effect. Proceeding of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, 12-17 October 2008.

[6]   Toprak, S., Taskin, F. and Koc, A.C. (2009) Prediction of Earthquake Damage to Urban Water Distribution Systems: A Case Study for Denizli, Turkey. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 68, 499-510.

[7]   Abdoun, T.H., Ha, D., O’Rourke, M.J., Symans, M.D., O’Rourke, T.D., Palmer, M.C. and Stewart, H.E. (2009) Factors Influencing the Behavior of Buried Pipelines Subjected to Earthquake Faulting. Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 29, 415-427.

[8]   Karamitros, D.K., Bouckovalas, G.D. and Kouretzis, G.P. (2007) Stress Analysis of Buried Pipelines at Strike Slip Fault Crossing. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 27, 200-211.

[9]   Kim, J., et al. (2010) Behavior of Full Scale Concrete Segmented Pipelines under Permanent Ground Displacements. Proceedings of SPIE, Health Monitoring of Structural and Biological Systems, 7650, 76500U-1-76500U-11.

[10]   Boorboor, A. and Hosseini, M. (2015) Evaluation of Water Distribution Jointed Pipe Networks under Transient Ground Motions. Open Journal of Civil Engineering, Previously Accepted.

[11]   American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) (1984) Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Oil and Gas Pipeline Systems. Committee on Gas and Liquid Fuel Lifeline, ASCE, Reston.