AJIBM  Vol.5 No.5 , May 2015
A Multi-Level Research on the Antecedents and Consequences of Group Task Satisfaction
Abstract: In this study, in order to examine antecedents and consequences of group task satisfaction, We collected 204 questionnaires with 35 hotel groups from 4 hotels located in Guangzhou and Shenzhen and used HLM to test the relationship between group task satisfaction and other variables in group level and individual level. The research findings show that employee individual job satisfaction mediates the effect of group task satisfaction on employee turnover intention and job performance; group task satisfaction mediates the positive effect of group cohesion and group job characteristics on individual job performance; group cohesion moderates the effect of individual job satisfaction on turnover intention and job performance.
Cite this paper: Wu, X. , Wen, B. and Du, M. (2015) A Multi-Level Research on the Antecedents and Consequences of Group Task Satisfaction. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 5, 264-271. doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2015.55028.

[1]   Hwang, J., Lee J., Park, S., Chang, H. and Kim, S. (2014) The Impact of Occupational Stress on Employee’s Turnover Intention in the Luxury Hotel Segment. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Administration, 15, 60-77.

[2]   Ribeiro, N. and Semedo, A. (2014) Human Resources Management Practices and Turnover Intentions: The Mediating Role of Organizational Justice. IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 7-32.

[3]   Elanain, H. (2014) Leader-Member Exchange and Intent to Turnover Testing a Mediated-Effects Model in a High Turnover Work Environment. Management Research Review, 37, 110-129.

[4]   Brunetto, Y., Teo, S.T., Shacklock, K. and Farr-Wharton, R. (2012) Emotional Intelligence, Job Satisfaction, Well-Being and Engagement: Explaining Organizational Commitment and Turnover Intentions in Policing. Human Resource Management Journal, 22, 428-441.

[5]   Wang, Y.-D., Yang, C. and Wang, K.-Y. (2012) Comparing Public and Private Employees’ Job Satisfaction and Turnover. Public Personnel Management, 41, 557-573.

[6]   Kanwar, Y.S., Singh, A.K. and Kodwani, A. (2012) A Study of Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment and Turnover Intent among the IT and ITES Sector Employees. The Journal of Business Perspective, 16, 27-35.

[7]   Chen, G., Ployhart, R.E., Thomas, H., Anderson, N. and Bliese, P.D. (2011) The Power of Momentum: A New Model of Dynamic Relationships between Job Satisfaction Change and Turnover Intentions. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 159-181.

[8]   Mason, C.M. and Griffin, M.A. (2002) Group Task Satisfaction: Applying the Construct of Job Satisfaction to Groups. Small Group Research, 33, 271-312.

[9]   Lewin, K. (1952) Field Theory in Social Science. Harper &Row, New York.

[10]   Hackman, J.R. and Oldham, G.R. (1975) Development of the Job Diagnostic Survey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 159-170.

[11]   Porter, L.W. and Steers, R.M. (1973) Organizational, Work, and Personal Factors in Employee Turnover and Absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 151-176.

[12]   Zaccaro, S.J. and Mccoy, M.C. (1988) The Effects of Task and Interpersonal Cohesiveness on Performance of a Disjunctive Group Task. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 837-851.

[13]   Mason, C.M. and Griffin, M.A. (2005) Group Task Satisfaction: The Group’s Shared Attitude to Its Task and Work Environment. Group and Organization Management, 30, 625-652.

[14]   Henry, K.B., Arrow, H. and Carini, B. (1999) A Tripartite Model of Group Identification: Theory and Measurement. Small Group Research, 30, 558-581.

[15]   Teas, R.K. (1981) Selling Task Characteristics and the Job Satisfaction of Industrial Salespeople. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 1, 18-25.

[16]   Smith, P.C., Kendall, L.M. and Hulin, C.L. (1969) The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement. Rand McNally and Company, Chicago.

[17]   Wayne, S.J., Shore, L.M. and Liden, R.C. (1997) Perceived Organizational Support and Leader Member Exchange: A Social Exchange Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 82-111.

[18]   Borman, W.C. and Motowidlo, S.J. (1993) Expanding the Criterion Domain to Include Elements of Contextual Performance. In: Schmitt, N. and Borman, W.C., Eds., Personnel Selection in Organization, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, 71- 78.

[19]   Klein, K.J., Bliese, P.D., Kozlowski, S.W.J., Dansereau, F., Gavin, M.B., Griffin, M.A., et al., (2000) Multilevel Analytical Techniques: Commonalities, Differences and Continuing Questions. In: Klein, K.J. and Kozlowski, S.W.J., Eds., Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 512-553.

[20]   Hofmann, D.A. (1997) An Overview of the Logic and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear Models. Journal of Management, 23, 723-744.

[21]   Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S.G. and Aiken, L.S. (2003) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 3rd Edition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, 267-300.

[22]   Baron, R.M. and Kenny, D.A. (1986) The Moderator—Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.

[23]   Seers, A. (1989) Team-Member Exchange Quality: A New Construct for Role-Making Research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43,118-135.

[24]   Dobbins, G.H. and Zaccaro, S.J. (1986) The Effects of Group Cohesion and Leader Behavior on Subordinate Satisfaction. Group & Organization Management, 11, 203-219.

[25]   Kidwell, R.E., Mossholder, K.W. and Bennett, N. (1997) Cohesiveness and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Multilevel Analysis Using Work Groups and Individuals. Journal of Management, 23, 775-793.