JMF  Vol.5 No.2 , May 2015
Cagan Effect and the Money Demand by Firms in China: A Nonlinear Panel Smooth Transition Approach
Abstract: This paper examines the Cagan effect in China by using a panel smooth transition approach on the firm-level data. Our results reveal that the demand for money by firms relatively decreases for the high inflation period, because the firm anticipates further price increase that it seeks a substitute for money, supporting the presence of the Cagan effect in firms in China. A policy implication of our finding is that efficiently managing Inflation Expectation is necessary in China in stimulating the economy through expansion of the money supply.
Cite this paper: Peng, F. , Zhan, K. and Lian, Y. (2015) Cagan Effect and the Money Demand by Firms in China: A Nonlinear Panel Smooth Transition Approach. Journal of Mathematical Finance, 5, 153-156. doi: 10.4236/jmf.2015.52014.

[1]   Cagan, P. (1956) The Monetary Dynamics of Hyperinflation. In: Friedman, M., Ed., Studies in the Quantity Theory of Money, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

[2]   Mladenovic, Z. and Petrovic, P. (2010) Cagan’s Paradox and Money Demand in Hyperinflation: Revisited at Daily Frequency. Journal of International Money and Finance, 29, 1369-1384.

[3]   Cargill, T.F. and Parker, E. (2004) Price Deflation, Money Demand, and Monetary Policy Discontinuity: A Comparative View of Japan, China, and the United States. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 15, 125- 147.

[4]   Basco, E., D’Amato, L. and Garegnani, L. (2009) Understanding the Money–Prices Relationship under Low and High Inflation Regimes: Argentina 1977-2006. Journal of International Money and Finance, 28, 1182-1203.

[5]   Minford, P. and Srinivasan, N. (2011) Ruling Out Unstable Equilibria in New Keynesian Models. Economics Letters, 112, 247-249.

[6]   Li, X.D. and Ji, Y.C. (2011) An Empirical Research on the Money-Supply Effect of Inflation Expectation When Managing Inflation Expectation in China-Based on Cagan Model and Lucas Microeconomic Rational Expectation Equation. IEEE 2011 International Conference on Management and Service Science (MASS), Wuhan, 12-14 August 2011, 1-4.

[7]   Fouquau, J., Hurlin, C. and Rabaud, I. (2008) The Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle: A Panel Smooth Transition Regression Approach. Economic Modelling, 25, 284-299.

[8]   Mulligan, C.B. (1997) Scale Economies, the Value of Time, and the Demand for Money: Longitudinal Evidence from Firms. Journal of Political Economy, 105, 1061-1079.

[9]   Lotti, F. and Marcucci, J. (2007) Revisiting the Empirical Evidence on Firms’ Money Demand. Journal of Economics and Business, 59, 51-73.

[10]   Choudhry, T. (1998) Another Visit to the Cagan Model of Money Demand: The Latest Russian Experience. Journal of International Money and Finance, 17, 355-376.

[11]   Gonzalez, A., Terasvirta, T. and Van Dijk, D. (2005) Panel Smooth Transition Regression Models. Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance, No. 604.

[12]   Van Dijk, D., Tersvirta, T. and Franses, P.H. (2002) Smooth Transition Autoregressive Models—A Survey of Recent Developments. Econometric Reviews, 21, 1-47.