OJAS  Vol.5 No.2 , April 2015
Comparison of Electro Ejaculator and Artificial Vagina on Semen Collection from South African Indigenous Goat Following Assessment by Computer Aided Sperm Analysis
Abstract: South African indigenous bucks are raised under extensive conditions and are more likely to reject artificial vagina (AV) due to their limited contact with human beings, as they are less handled. The purpose of the study was to compare goat semen collection techniques used for goats based on semen traits of South African indigenous bucks during the natural breeding season. A total of eight South African indigenous bucks were used, four bucks per semen collection technique due to their scarcity. Before semen collection with AV group, ten bucks were trained and exposed to AV. Semen was then collected from both groups over a period of six weeks per individual buck. Semen volume, pH and sperm concentration were evaluated immediately. The Computer Aided Sperm Analysis (CASA) assessed the sperm motility rates. Sperm morphology was evaluated using a fluorescence microscope with the aid of eosin-nigrosin staining. Analysis of variance was used to test the differences among the semen collection groups following assessment by CASA. Semen collected with EE resulted in higher semen volume (1.1 mL) compared with AV (0.5 mL) technique. However, AV technique resulted in higher total sperm motility and rapid movement (91.9% and 48.7%), live sperm (72%) and sperm concentration (635.6 × 106 sperm/mL) compared with EE (86.3% and 30.4%; 69% and 463.7 × 106 sperm/mL, respectively). There were no significant differences observed in pH and sperm morphology characteristics between two semen collection techniques. Moreover, EE had higher sperm moving in a progressive (53.6%) and medium rate compared with AV (41.1% and 21.9%) technique. It was concluded that the AV yielded higher total sperm motility rate, sperm concentration and rapid sperm movement compared with EE. Therefore, AV was more suitable for semen collection of South African indigenous bucks, even though training was problematic to such indigenous bucks.
Cite this paper: Bopape, M. , Lehloenya, K. , Chokoe, T. , Nedambale, T. , (2015) Comparison of Electro Ejaculator and Artificial Vagina on Semen Collection from South African Indigenous Goat Following Assessment by Computer Aided Sperm Analysis. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 5, 210-218. doi: 10.4236/ojas.2015.52023.

[1]   Donkin, E.F. and Boyazoglu, P.A. (2000) Milk Production from Bucks for Household and Small-Scale Farmers in South Africa. University of Pretoria, Pretoria.

[2]   Agricultural Research Council (2006) The Indigenous Buck Breeds of South Africa.

[3]   Leboeuf, B., Restall, B. and Salamon, S. (2000) Production and Storage of Goat Semen for Artificial Insemination. Animal Reproduction Science, 62, 113-114.

[4]   Jiménez-Rabadán, P., Ramón, M.,García-álvarez, O., Maroto-Morales, A., Del Olmo, E., Pérez-Guzmán, M.D., Bisbal, A., Fernández-Santos, M.R., Garde, J.J. and Soler, A.J. (2012) Effect of Semen Collection Method (Artificial Vagina vs. Electroejaculation), Extender and Centrifugation on Post-Thaw Sperm Quality of Blanca-Celtibérica Buck Ejaculates. Animal Reproduction Science, 132, 88-95.

[5]   Wulster-Radcliffe, M.C., Williams, M.A., Stellflug, J.N. and Lewis, G.S. (2001) Technical Note: Artificial Vagina vs. a Vaginal Collection Vial for Collecting Semen from Rams. Journal of Animal Science, 79, 2964-2967.

[6]   Santiago-Moreno, J., Coloma, M.A., Dorado, J., Pulido-Pastor, A., Gómez Guillamon,F., Salas-Vega, R., Gómez- Brunet, A. and López-Sebastián, A. (2009) Cryopreservation of Spanish Ibex (Capra pyrenaica) Sperm Obtained by Electro-Ejaculation Outside the Rutting Season. Theriogenology, 71, 1253-1260.

[7]   Palmer, C.W. (2005) Welfare Aspects of Theriogenology: Investigating Alternatives to Electro-Ejaculation of Bulls. Theriogenology, 65, 469-479.

[8]   Marco-Jiménez, F., Vincente, J.S. and Vludes-De-Castro, M.P. (2008) Seminal Plasma Composition from Ejaculates Collected by Artificial Vagina and Electro-Ejaculation in Guirra Ram. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 43, 403-408.

[9]   Batista, M., Nino, T., Alamo, D., Castro, N., Santana, M., González, F., Cabrera, F. and Gracia, A. (2009) Successful Artificial Insemination Using Semen Frozen and Stored by an Ultra Freezer in the Majorera Buck Breed. Theriogenology, 71, 1307-1315.

[10]   Udeh, I. and Oghenesode, B. (2011) Effect of Extender and Storage Conditions on the Motility of Buck Spermatozoa. International Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 5, 282-286.

[11]   Marco-Jiménez, F., Puchades, S., Vincente, J.S. and Vludes-De-Castro, M.P. (2005) Effect of Semen Collection Method on Pre- and Post-Thaw Guirra Ram Spermatozoa. Theriogenology, 64, 1756-1765.

[12]   Carter, P.D., Hamilton, P.A. and Duffy, J.H. (1990) Electro Ejaculation in Bucks. Australian Veterinary Journal, 67, 91-93.

[13]   Mosure, W.L., Meyer, R.A., Gudmondson, J. and Barth, A.D. (1998) Evaluation of Possible Methods to Reduce Pain Associated with Electro Ejaculation in Bull. Canadian Veterinary Journal, 39, 504-506.

[14]   Ortiz-de-Montellano, M., Galindo-Maldonado, F., Cavazos-Arizpe, E.O., Aguayo-Arceo, A.M., Torres-Acosta, J.F. and Orihuela, A. (2007) Effect of Electro-Ejaculation on the Serum Cortisol Response of Criollo Bucks (Capra hircus). Small Ruminant Research, 69, 228-231.

[15]   Orihuela, A., Aguire, V., Hernandez, C., Flores-Perez, I. and Vazquez, R. (2009) Breaking down the Effect of Electro-Ejaculation on the Serum Cortisol Response, Heart and Respiratory Rate in Hair Sheep (Ovis aries). Journal of Animal Veterinary Advances, 8, 1969-1972.

[16]   Jane, E.J., William, R.B. and Dawn, W.B. (1996) Manual versus Computer-Automated Semen Analyses. Determination or the Working Range of a Computer-Automated Semen Analyzer. Fertility and Sterility, 65, 156-159.

[17]   Mortimer, S.T. (2000) CASA-Practical Aspects. Journal of Andrology, 21, 515-524.

[18]   Foote, R.H. (2003) Fertility Estimation: A Review of Past Experience and Future Prospects. Animal Reproduction Science, 75, 119-139.

[19]   Wilhelm, K.M., Graham, J.K. and Squires, E.L. (1996) Comparison of the Fertility of Cryopreserved Stallion Spermatozoa with Sperm Motion Analyses, Flow Cytometric Evaluation, and Zona-Free Hamster Oocyte Penetration. Theriogenology, 46, 559-578.

[20]   Holt, C., Holt, W.V., Moore, H.D., Reed, H.C. and Curnock, R.M. (1997) Objectively Measured Boar Sperm Motility Parameters Correlate with the Outcomes of On-Farm Inseminations: Results of Two Fertility Trials. Journal of Andrology, 18, 312-323.

[21]   Farrell, P.B., Presicce, G.A., Brockett, C.C. and Foote, R.H. (1998) Quantification of Bull Sperm Characteristics Measured by Computer-Assisted Sperm Analysis (CASA) and the Relationship to Fertility. Theriogenology, 49, 871-879.

[22]   Webb, E.C., Dombo, M.H. and Roets, M. (2004) Seasonal Variation in Semen Quality of Gorno Altai Cashmere Bucks and South African Indigenous Bucks. South African Journal of Animal Science, 34, 240-243.

[23]   Matshaba, B. (2010) Characterization and Cryopreservation of South African Unimproved Indigenous Buck Semen. Master’s Dissertation, University of Free State, Bloemfontein.

[24]   Talebi, J., Souri, M., Moghaddam, A., Karimi, I. and Mirmahmoodi, M. (2009) Characteristics and Seasonal Variation in the Semen of Markhoz in Western Iran. Small Ruminant Research, 85, 18-22.

[25]   Ramukhithi, F.V. (2011) Characterisation and Cryopreservation of South African Unimproved Indigenous and Boer Buck Semen. Master’s Dissertation, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria.

[26]   Ramukhithi, F.V., Nedambale, T.L., Sutherland, B. and Lehloenya, K.C. (2011) Cryopreservation of South African Indigenous Buck Semen. African Journal of Biotechnology, 77, 17898-17902.

[27]   Batista, M., Nino, T., Santana, M., Alamo, D., Castro, N., Reyes, R., González, F., Cabrera, F. and Gracia, A. (2011) Influence of the Preservation Temperature (37, 20, 4, -196 ℃). Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 46, 281-288.

[28]   Prins, G.S. (1999) Semen. In: Knobil, E. and Neill, J.D., Eds., Encyclopedia of Reproduction 4, Academic Press, San Diego, 360-367.

[29]   Ngoula, F., Tebug, T.T., Kenfack, A., Defang, F.H., Tendokeng, F. and Pamo, T.E. (2012) Effect of Buck Age, Storage Duration, Storage Temperature and Diluents on Fresh West African Dwarf Semen. Journal of Reproduction and Infertility, 3, 58-66.

[30]   Sundararaman, M.N., Kalatharan, J. and Edwin, M.J. (2007) Attempts to Achieve Semen Collection from Incapacitated Boars by Electro-Ejaculation. Journal of Animal Veterinary, 4, 244-246.

[31]   Latif, A., Ijaz, A., Aleem, M. and Mahmud, A. (2005) Effect of Osmotic Pressure and pH on the Short-Term Storage and Fertility of Broiler Breeder Sperm. Pakistan Veterinary Journal, 25, 180-182.

[32]   Oyeyemi, M.O., Akusu, M.O. and Ola-Davies, O.E. (2000) Effect of Successive Ejaculations on the Spermiogram of West African Dwarf Bucks (Capra hircus L.). Veterinarski Arhiv Journal, 70, 215-221.

[33]   Nur, Z., Dogan, I., Gunay, U. and Soylu, M.K. (2005) Relationships between Sperm Membrane Integrity and Other Semen Quality Characteristics of the Semen of Saanen Bucks. Bulletin of Veterinary Institute in Pulawy, 49, 183-187.