OJAppS  Vol.5 No.4 , April 2015
Structure, Evolution and Hot Spots of Cooperation Innovation Knowledge Network
ABSTRACT
Based on the statistics analysis of cooperation innovation articles, the paper analyses the distributing characteristics of cooperation innovation research papers. The distribution, structure and evolution of cooperation innovation research are studied through the social network and co-word method, combined with the information visualization technology. This study is based on the papers in the SSCI database during 2000-2014. The analysis and statistics of papers reveal distribution characteristics of the subject, time, institutions, countries and areas. The statistics shows that the research perspective of cooperation innovation from business and economics. The time distribution presents that research of cooperation innovation attracts enormous attention and the research achievement is increasing. From the distribution of organizations, countries and areas, North America and Europe countries maintain the leading position in this research field. But institutions and universities of China and other Asian countries or areas are witnessed their outstanding achievements in cooperation innovation research. Combining the co-word network analysis method, the paper studies the structure and content of cooperation innovation knowledge network in five stages and makes the net spectrum, visually showing the hot spots at various periods. The top highly cited papers in all five stages are reviewed simultaneously; their research hot spots and evolution process are concluded. The study shows 11 subjects including strategic alliances, social networks, R&D cooperation, R&D, technology transfer, alliances, knowledge management, social capital, entrepreneurship, trust, biotechnology are always the central issues in last 15 years. The focus of research is from the relationship between alliance and technology innovation to networking and knowledge innovation and then to open innovation.

Cite this paper
Zhang, X. and Song, W. (2015) Structure, Evolution and Hot Spots of Cooperation Innovation Knowledge Network. Open Journal of Applied Sciences, 5, 121-134. doi: 10.4236/ojapps.2015.54013.
References
[1]   Chesbrough, H.W. (2003) Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business Press, Boston.

[2]   Rigby, D. and Zook, C. (2002) Open-Market Innovation. Harvard Business Review, 80, 80-93.

[3]   Calantone, R.J. and Stanko, M.A. (2007) Drivers of Outsourced Innovation: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24, 230-241.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2007.00247.x

[4]   Anand, B.N. and Khanna, T. (2000) Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 21, 295-315.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<295::AID-SMJ91>3.0.CO;2-O

[5]   Gulati, R., Lavie, D. and Singh, H. (2009) The Nature of Partnering Experience and the Gains from Alliances. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 1213-1233.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.786

[6]   Merchant, H. and Schendel, D. (2000) How Do International Joint Ventures Create Shareholder Value? Strategic Man- agement Journal, 21, 723-737.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200007)21:7<723::AID-SMJ114>3.0.CO;2-H

[7]   Casciaro, T. and Piskorski, M.J. (2005) Power Imbalance, Mutual Dependence, and Constraint Absorption: A Closer Look at Resource Dependence Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 167-199.

[8]   Hillman, A.J., Withers, M.C. and Collins, B.J. (2009) Resource Dependence Theory: A Review. Journal of Management, 35, 1404-1427.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206309343469

[9]   Das, T.K. and Teng, B.S. (2002) The Dynamics of Alliance Conditions in the Alliance Development Process. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 725-746.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00006

[10]   Zollo, M., Reuer, J.J. and Singh, H. (2002) Interorganizational Routines and Performance in Strategic Alliances. Or ganization Science, 13, 701-713.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.6.701.503

[11]   Shan, W., Walker, G. and Kogut, B. (1994) Interfirm Cooperation and Startup Innovation in the Biotechnology Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 387-394.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150505

[12]   Nooteboom, B. (1999) Inter-Firm Alliances: Analysis and Design. Psychology Press, London.

[13]   Ahuja, G. (2000) Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 425-455. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2667105

[14]   Belderbos, R., Carree, M. and Lokshin, B. (2004) Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance. Research Policy, 33, 1477- 1492. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.07.003

[15]   Lavie, D. and Miller, S.R. (2008) Alliance Portfolio Internationalization and Firm Performance. Organization Science, 19, 623-646.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0341

[16]   Belderbos, R., Carree, M. and Lokshin, B. (2006) Complementarity in R&D Cooperation Strategies. Review of Industrial Organization, 28, 401-426.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11151-006-9102-z

[17]   Hagedoorn, J., Link, A.N. and Vonortas, N.S. (2000) Research Partnerships. Research Policy, 29, 567-586. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00090-6

[18]   Adner, R. (2006) Match Your Innovation Strategy to Your Innovation Ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, 84, 98.

[19]   Cook, K.S. (1977) Exchange and Power in Networks of Interorganizational Relations. The Sociological Quarterly, 18, 62-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1977.tb02162.x

[20]   Rosenkopf, L. and Nerkar, A. (2001) Beyond Local Search: Boundary-Spanning, Exploration, and Impact in the Optical Disk Industry. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 287-306.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.160

[21]   Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W. and Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116-145. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2393988

[22]   Nelson, R.R. and Winter, S.G. (2009) An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

[23]   Metcalfe, J.S. (1994) Evolutionary Economics and Technology Policy. The Economic Journal, 104, 931-944. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2234988

[24]   Levinthal, D.A. and March, J.G. (1993) The Myopia of Learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009

[25]   Petruzzelli, A.M. (2011) The Impact of Technological Relatedness, Prior Ties, and Geographical Distance on University-Industry Collaborations: A Joint-Patent Analysis. Technovation, 31, 309-319.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2011.01.008

[26]   Dyer, J.H. and Singh, H. (1998) The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 660-679.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/259056

[27]   Barajas, A. and Huergo, E. (2010) International R&D Cooperation within the EU Framework Programme: Empirical Evidence for Spanish Firms. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19, 87-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10438590903016492

[28]   Dyer, J.H. and Hatch, N.W. (2006) Relation-Specific Capabilities and Barriers to Knowledge Transfers: Creating Advantage through Network Relationships. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 701-719.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/smj.543

[29]   Fusfeld, H.I. and Haklisch, C.S. (1985) Cooperative R-AND-D for Competitors. Harvard Business Review, 63, 60.

[30]   Fritsch, M. and Lukas, R. (2001) Who Cooperates on R&D? Research Policy, 30, 297-312.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00115-8

[31]   Teece, D.J. (1992) Competition, Cooperation, and Innovation: Organizational Arrangements for Regimes of Rapid Technological Progress. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 18, 1-25.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(92)90050-L

 
 
Top