Back
 OJPS  Vol.5 No.3 , April 2015
Generational Responses to Job Security, Traditional Class Division, and the American Dream
Abstract: This paper examines some of the leading theories around the generation question. Using data gathered from the Survey Documentation and Analysis-Frequencies/Cross Tabulation Program, this paper analyzes generational responses to three issues: job security, traditional class division, and the American dream. The purpose of this research is to arrive at which theory of generation more accurately explains generational behavior.
Cite this paper: Wehyee, Y. (2015) Generational Responses to Job Security, Traditional Class Division, and the American Dream. Open Journal of Political Science, 5, 202-209. doi: 10.4236/ojps.2015.53021.
References

[1]   Carpini, M. X. D. (1989). Age and History: Generations and Sociopolitical Change. In R. S. Sigel (Ed.), Political Learning in Adulthood: A Sourcebook of Theory and Research (pp. 1-18). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[2]   DeLeire, T., & Lopoo, L. M. (2010). Family Structure and the Economic Mobility of Children.

[3]   DeNavas-Walt, C., Proctor, B. D., Smith, J. C., & US Census Bureau (2012). Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2012. Washington DC: United States Census Bureau.

[4]   Deparle, J. (2012). For Poor, Leap to College Often Ends in a Hard Fall. The New York Times.

[5]   Harris, E., Sammartino, F., & United States (2011). Trends in the Distribution of Household Income between 1979 and 2007. Washington DC: Congress of the United States, Congressional Budget Office.

[6]   Howe, N., & Strauss, W. (2000). Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation. In R. J. Matson (Ed.), Cartoons. New York: Vintage Books.

[7]   Isaacs, J. B., & Brookings Institution, Washington DC. Economic Mobility of Families across Generations. Economic Mobility Project.

[8]   Jäntti, M. (2006). American Exceptionalism in a New Light: A Comparison of Intergenerational Earnings Mobility in the Nordic Countries, the United Kingdom and the United States. Bonn: IZA.

[9]   Kneebone, E., Nadeau, C., & Berube, A., Brookings Institution (2011). The Re-Emergence of Concentrated Poverty: Metropolitan Trends in the 2000s. Washington DC: Metropolitan Policy Program at Brookings.

[10]   MacManus, S. A. (1995). Young v. Old: Generational Combat in the 21st Century. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.

[11]   Mannheim, K. (1952). The Sociological Problems of Generations. In P. Kecskemeti (Ed.), Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge (pp. 163-195). New York: Oxford University Press.

[12]   Matusow, A. J. (2009). The Unraveling of America: History of Liberalism in the 1960s. Athens, Georgia: The University of Georgia Press.

[13]   Pew Charitable Trust (2012). Pursuing the American Dream: Economic Mobility across Generations. Economic Mobility Project.
http://www.publicradio.org/marketplace-archive/pdf/pew_american_dream.pdf

[14]   Pew Research Center (2013). On Pay Gap, Millennial Women Near Parity—For Now: Despite Gains, Many See Roadbloacks Ahead.
http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/files/2013/12/gender-and-work_final.pdf

[15]   Walsh, K. C., Jennings, M. K., & Stoker, L. (2001). The Effects of Social Class Identification on Participatory Orientations towards Government. British Journal of Political Science, 34, 469-495.

[16]   Weber, M. (2013). Class, Status, and Party.
http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~jimi/363/webercsp.pdf

 
 
Top