JSS  Vol.3 No.4 , April 2015
Cooperative Learning Online in Higher Education. Second Experience at Roma Tre University, Italy
Author(s) Concetta La Rocca*
ABSTRACT
This study presents the procedures and results of online cooperative learning activities carried out by the students in the a.y. 2013/14 in two academic courses at the Department of Education at Roma Tre University (Italy): “General Didactic” (GD), First-level Degree in Education Sciences and “Educational Strategies and New Communication Processes” (ES), Second-level Degree in Professional Community Educator. It constitutes the continuation of the first pilot study, carried out only in the teaching of GD in the academic year 2012/13 which has already been reported in a previous publication [1]; this second experience is built in a perspective of continuity and difference from the first one. This study is divided into two interventions: a) description and analysis of the data collected following the administration of a questionnaire, said barometer, developed to detect the climate experienced by the students involved in the online working groups; b) investigation of the relapse that collaborative activities produced on the performance. In particular, we observe that the average mark obtained in the exam of “General Didactics” by the students in cooperative is on average higher than others, and that in the first group there is less “sigma” compared to the second group.

Cite this paper
La Rocca, C. (2015) Cooperative Learning Online in Higher Education. Second Experience at Roma Tre University, Italy. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 3, 86-94. doi: 10.4236/jss.2015.34011.
References
[1]   La Rocca, C., Margottini, M. and Capobianco, R. (2014) Collaborative Learning in Higher Education. Open Journal of Social Sciences.

[2]   Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T. and Smith, K. (2014) Cooperative Learning: Improving University Instruction by Basing Practice on Validated Theory. In: Davidson, N., Major, C. and Michaelsen, L., Eds., Small-Group Learning in Higher Education: Cooperative, Collaborative, Problem-Based and Team-Based Learning. Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 25(4). http://personal.cege.umn.edu/~smith/docs/Johnson-Johnson-Smith-Cooperative_Learning-JECT-Small_Group_Learning-draft.pdf

[3]   Johnson, D.W. and Johnson, R. (1989) Cooperation and Competition: Theory and Research. Interaction Book Company, Edina.

[4]   Springer, L., Stanne, M.E. and Donovan, S.S. (1999) Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 21-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543069001021

[5]   Astin, A. (1993) What Matters in University: Four Critical Years Revisited. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

[6]   McKeachie, W., Pintrich, P., Yi-Guang, L. and Smith, D. (1986) Teaching and Learning in the University Classroom: A Review of the Research Literature. The Regents of the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.

[7]   Pascarella, E. (2001) Cognitive Growth in University. Change, 33, 21-27.

[8]   Tinto, V. (1993) Leaving University: Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition. 2nd Edition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

[9]   Calvani, A. (2005) Rete, comunità e conoscenza. Costruire e gestire dinamiche collaborative. Trento, Erickson.

[10]   McConnell, D. (2000) Implementing Computer Supported Cooperative Learning. 2nd Edition, Kogan Page, London, 264 p.

[11]   McConnell, D. (2005) Examining the Dynamics of Networked E-Learning Groups and Communities. Studies in Higher Education, 30, 23-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0307507052000307777

[12]   Bradley, S.A. and McConnell, D. (2008) Virtual Groups in Learning Environments: Collaboration, Cooperation or (Self) Centred Individualism? Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Networked Learning, 24-31. http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/abstracts/PDFs/Bradley_24-31.pdf

[13]   Crosta, L. and McConnell, D. (2008) Online Learning Groups Development: A Grounded International Comparison. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Networked Learning, 61-68.

[14]   Koschmann, T. (Ed.) (1996) CSCL: Theory and Practice of an Emerging Paradigm. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah. http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/abstracts/PDFs/Crosta_61-68.pdf

[15]   Smith, J. and Coenders, M. (2002) E-Feedback to Reflect Legitimate Peripheral Participation; Towards a Redefinition of Feedback in Online Learning Environments. In: Driscoll, M. and Reeves, T., Eds., Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2002, 878-890.

[16]   Arnold, P. and Smith, J. (2003) Adding Connectivity and Losing Context with ICT: Contrasting Learning Situations from a Community of Practice Perspective. In: Huysman, M., Wenger, E. and Wulf, V., Eds., Communities and Technologies-Proceedings of the First International Conference on Communities and Technologies, C&T 2003.

 
 
Top