E. Ofner-Schröck^1*, M. Zähner², G. Huber¹, K. Guldimann², T. Guggenberger¹, J. Gasteiner¹

Show more
¹ HBLFA Raumberg-Gumpenstein, Agricultural Research & Education Centre, Irdning, Austria.
² Institute for Sustainability Sciences (ISS), Ettenhausen, Switzerland.
Show less

Abstract: Compost barns for dairy cows are showing increased popularity also in Central Europe. A compost barn is used mainly as a two-area system with a bedded lying area and a solid feeding alley. Sawdust or dry fine wood shavings or wood chips are mostly used as bedding material, which has to be stirred twice a day. Stirring aerates and mixes faeces and urine into the bedding material, the mixture decomposes by means of aerobic microorganisms. A joint research project between the Agricultural Research and Education Centre Raumberg-Gumpenstein (HBLFA) and the Institute for Sustainability Sciences Tänikon (ISS) analyzed amongst other things, the cleanliness of the animals, integument alterations, lying behaviour and the current lameness situation of animals. A total of 138 cows were examined on five Austrian dairy farms. All cows were visually scored and animal behaviour was observed by data loggers as well as by direct observation. The mean value concerning cleanliness of animals was 0.44, while the udder was the cleanest and the lower leg the dirtiest area. Only a few lesions in carpal and tarsal joints could be found. Cows showed no differences in lying behaviour between times of day and temperatures. Large differences in lying behaviour were evident among farms. While on the compost barn farms only around 25% of all cows were scored to be lame, on cubicle-housing system farms 31% - 46% of the cows fell into that category (p < 0.001). From the present results, the compost barn can be seen as an animal-friendly system. In further investigations other factors affecting animal health and to resolve any outstanding issues concerning economy and alternative litter materials should be analyzed.

Keywords: Compost Barn, Cattle, Dairy Cows, Behaviour, Cleanliness, Lameness

Cite this paper: Ofner-Schröck, E. , Zähner, M. , Huber, G. , Guldimann, K. , Guggenberger, T. and Gasteiner, J. (2015) Compost Barns for Dairy Cows—Aspects of Animal Welfare. Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 5, 124-131. doi: 10.4236/ojas.2015.52015.

References

[1]   Barberg, A.E., Endres, M.I., Salfer, J.A. and Reneau, J.K. (2007) Performance and Welfare of Dairy Cows in an Alternative Housing System in Minnesota. Journal of Dairy Science, 90, 1575-1583.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71643-0

[2]   Barberg, A.E., Endres, M.I. and Janni, K.A. (2007) Compost Dairy Barns in Minnesota: A Descriptive Study. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 23, 231-238.

[3]   Endres, M.I. and Barberg, A.E. (2007) Behavior of Dairy Cows in an Alternative Bedded-Pack Housing System. Journal of Dairy Science, 90, 4192-4200.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-751

[4]   Espejo, L.A., Endres, M.I. and Salfer, J.A. (2006) Prevalence of Lameness in High-Producing Holstein Cows Housed in Freestall Barns in Minnesota. Journal of Dairy Science, 89, 3052-3058.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72579-6

[5]   Janni, K.A., Endres, M.I., Reneau, J.K. and Schoper, W.W. (2007) Compost Dairy Barn Layout and Management Re- commendations. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers, 23, 97-102.

[6]   Holzeder, S. (2011) Kompoststall—eine Alternative stellt sich vor. In: Tagungsbandzur Bautagung Raumberg-Gum-penstein 2011, HBLFA Raumberg-Gumpenstein, Irdning, 5-6. http://www.raumberg-gumpenstein.at

[7]   Holzeder, S. (2012) Komfort zum Wohlfühlen. Elite, 3, 54-59.

[8]   Leifker, A. (2010) Grenzenlose Freiheit? Top Agrar, 4, R6-R10.

[9]   Faye, B. and Barnouin, J. (1985) Objectivation de la propreté des vaches laitières et des stabulations—L’indice de propreté. Bulletin Technique C.R.Z.V. Theix, INRA, 59, 61-67.

[10]   Ekesbo, I. (1984) Methoden der Beurteilung von Umwelteinflüssen auf Nutztiere unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Tiergesundheit und des Tierschutzes. Wien. Tierarztliche Monatsschrift, 71, 186-190.

[11]   Winckler, C. and Willen, S. (2001) The Reliability and Repeatability of a Lameness Scoring System for Use as an Indicator of Welfare in Dairy Cattle. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A—Animal Science, Suppl. 30, 103-107.

[12]   Ofner-Schrock, E., Zahner, M., Huber, G., Guldimann, K., Guggenberger, T. and Gasteiner, J. (2014) Rahmenbedin- gungen für den Einsatz von Kompoststallen in der Milchviehhaltung. Final Report, HBLFA Raumberg-Gumpenstein, Irdning.
http://www.raumberg-gumpenstein.at

[13]   Zahner, M. (2001) Beurteilung von Minimalstallen für Milchvieh anhand ethologischer und physiologischer Parameter. Dissertation ETH, Zürich.

[14]   Keck, M., Zahner, M. and Hauser, R. (2004) Minimalstalle für Milchkühe bewahren sich: Empfehlungen für die Planung und den Betrieb. FAT Report No. 620, Forschungsanstalt Agroscope Reckenholz-Tanikon ART.

[15]   Zahner, M., Schmidtko, J., Schrade, S., Sachaeren, W. and Otten, S. (2009) Alternative Einstreumaterialien in Liege-boxen. In: Tagungsband Bautagung Raumberg-Gumpenstein 2009, HBLFA Raumberg-Gumpenstein, 33-38.
http://www.raumberg-gumpenstein.at

[16]   Horning, B. (2003) Nutztierethologische Untersuchungen zur Liegeplatzqualitat in Milchviehlaufstallsystemen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung eines epidemiologischen Ansatzes. Postdoctoral Thesis (Habilitationsschrift), Universitat Kassel, Witzenhausen.

[17]   Schreiner, D.A. and Ruegg, P.L. (2003) Relationship between Udder and Leg Hygiene Scores and Subclinical Mastitis. Journal of Dairy Science, 86, 3460-3465.
http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73950-2

[18]   Buchwalder, T. (1999) Einfluss der Liegeplatzqualitat auf das Verhalten und die Schaden bei Milchkühen im Boxenlaufstall. Interner Schlussbericht, Tanikon.

[19]   Schaub, J., Friedli, K. and Wechsler, B. (1999) Weiche Liegematten für Milchvieh-Boxenlaufstalle-Strohmatratzen und sechs Fabrikate von weichen Liegematten im Vergleich. FAT Reports No. 529, Tanikon.

[20]   Ofner-Schrock, E., Gasteiner, J., Guggenberger, J., Mosenbacher-Molterer, I., Hausler, J., Krimberger, B., Zainer, I., Zainer, J., Finotti, E. and Bachler, C. (2009) Vergleich der Bewertung der Tiergerechtheit von Rinderhaltungssystemen mit dem Tiergerechtheitsindex TGI 35 L und mit Hilfe von ethologischen und tiergesundheitlichen Parametern. Final Report Project No. BAL 03 2324, HBLFA Raumberg-Gumpenstein, Irdning.

[21]   Dippel, S., Dolezal, M., Brenninkmeyer, C., Brinkmann, J., March, S., Knierim, U. and Winckler, C. (2009) Risk Factors for Lameness in Cubicle Housed Austrian Simmental Dairy Cows. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 90, 102-112.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.03.014

[22]   Mülleder, C. and Waiblinger, S. (2004) Analyse der Einflussfaktoren auf Tiergerechtheit, Tiergesundheit und Leistung von Milchkühen im Boxenlaufstall auf konventionellen und biologischen Betrieben unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Mensch-Tier-Beziehung. Endberichtzum Forschungsprojekt 1267, Eigenverlag Wien, 184 p.

[23]   Sprecher, D.J., Hostetler, D.E. and Kaneene, J.B. (1997) A Lameness Scoring System that Uses Posture and Gait to Predict Dairy Cattle Reproductive Performance. Theriogenology, 47, 1179-1187.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(97)00098-8