Back
 AHS  Vol.4 No.1 , March 2015
Arab-Islamic Reception and Development of Hellenistic Science
Abstract: This article is an overview of the Arab-Islamic reception and development of Hellenistic science. It particularly refers to mathematics, physics and astronomy. It focuses on the following topics: 1) Two interpretative models of this reception in the 19th, 20th, and 21st century scholarship: the “Indo-European model” (which supposes a cultural heterogeneity between Greece and Islam) and the “cosmopolitan Hellenistic model” (which supposes homogeneity between the two). 2) The channels through which Hellenistic science was transmitted to the Islamic world: the philological channel, and the oral channel which implies the pre-existence of a common Greek-Semitic cultural ground that made this transmission possible. 3) Three features of the Arab-Islamic sciences that highlight their essential contribution to the emergence of modern science in 16th and 17th century Europe: 3.1. The “democratising” character of the Arab-Islamic sciences resulting from a larger diffusion of literacy. 3.2. The higher precision of measurements and calculations. 3.3. The experimental approach of Muslim scientists. A positive role in the accomplishment of these advances has been played by the non-metaphysical character of orthodox Islamic monotheism. According to Muslim orthodoxy, there are no Neo-Platonic intermediaries between the almighty God and his creation. The whole universe is submitted to the same physical laws. I argue that today it is important to open an interdisciplinary debate on the Arab-Islamic sciences. It would certainly lead to a better appreciation of their historical contribution. It could also suggest answers to contemporary epistemological impasses deriving from the growing gap between the humanities and the sciences.
Cite this paper: Lelli, G. (2015) Arab-Islamic Reception and Development of Hellenistic Science. Advances in Historical Studies, 4, 29-42. doi: 10.4236/ahs.2015.41004.
References

[1]   Abed al-Jabri, M. (1999). Arab-Islamic Philosophy. A Contemporary Critique. Austin: The Centre for Middle Eastern Studies at the University of Austin.

[2]   Abed al-Jabri, M. (2006). Nahnu wa al-turāth. Beirut: Centre for Arab Unity Studies.

[3]   Al-Bāqillānī (1957). Kitāb al-tamhīd. P. R. J. McCarthy (Ed.). Beirut: 1957.

[4]   Al-Battānī (1899-1907). Al-Battānī sive Albatenii Opus astronomicum (al-Zīj al-Sābi'). C. A. Nallino (Ed.), 3 Vols. Milano: Ulrich Hoepli.

[5]   Al-Bīrūnī (1879). The Chronology of Ancient Nations. E. Sachau (Transl.). London: W. H. Allen & Co.

[6]   Al-Bīrūnī (1923). Chronologie Orientalistiker Völker. E. Sachau (Ed.). Leipzig. http://www.albiruni.nl/

[7]   Amin, S. (1999). Judaism, Christianity and Islam: An Introductory Approach to their Real or Supposed Specificities by a Non-Theologian. In A. Mueller, A. Tausch, & P. Zulehner (Eds.), Global Capitalism, Liberation Theology, and the Social Sciences: An Analysis of the Contradictions of Modernity at the Turn of the Millennium. New York: Nova Science Publishers.

[8]   Amin, S. (1988). L’Eurocentrisme. Critique d’une idéologie. Paris: Anthropos economica.

[9]   Arkoun, M. (1991). La pensée arabe. Paris : PUF.

[10]   Bausani, A. (1985). Il contributo scientifico. In F. Gabrieli (Ed.), Gli Arabi in Italia (pp. 629-660). Milano: Garzanti Scheiwiller.

[11]   Bernal, M. (1987). Black Athena. The Afro-Asiatic Roots of Classical Civilization. Vol.1: The Fabrication of Ancient Greece, 1785-1985. London: Free Association Books.

[12]   Braudel, F. (1993). Grammaire des civilisations. Paris: Flammarion.

[13]   De Libéra. A. (1993). La philosophiemédiévale. Paris: PUF

[14]   Galilei, G. (1843). Le Opere complete di Galileo Galilei. Vol. II: Lettere intorno al sistema copernicano. Firenze: Società Editrice Fiorentina.

[15]   Galilei, G. (1844). Le Opere complete di Galileo Galilei. Vol. IV: Opere astronomiche. Firenze: Società Editrice Fiorentina.

[16]   Hogendijk, J. 1 (2002). Two Editions of Ibn al-Haytham’s Completion of the Conics. Historia Mathematica, 29, 247-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/hmat.2002.2352

[17]   Hogendijk, J. 2 (2002). The Burning Mirrors of Diocles: Reflections on the Methodology and Purpose of the History of Pre-Modern Science. Early Science and Medicine, 7, 181-197.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157338202X00108

[18]   Ibn al-Haytham (1983). Kitāb al-Manāzir (Optics): Vol. 1-3. Kuwait: Sabra.

[19]   Ibn Khaldūn (1967). The Muqaddimah: An Introduction to History. 3 Volumes, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

[20]   Ibn Khaldūn (2001). Muqaddima Ibn Khaldūn. Beirut: Dār Al-Fikr.
http://ia700408.us.archive.org/0/items/waqtkhldon/tkhldon1.pdf

[21]   Jolivet, J. (1996). Classification of Science. In R. Rashed (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the History of Arabic Science (Vol. 3, pp. 1008 f). London and New York: Routledge.

[22]   Koyré, A. (1948). Du monde de l’à peu près à l’univers de la précision. In A. Koyré (Ed.), Etudes d’histoire de la pensée philosophique (pp. 341-362). Paris: Gallimard.

[23]   Koyré, A. (1973). Etudes d’histoire de la pensée scientifique. Paris: Gallimard.

[24]   Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: the University of Chicago Press.

[25]   Kunitzsch, P. (1975). Uber das Frühstaduium der arabischen Aneignung antiken Gutes. Saeculum, 26, 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.7788/saeculum.1975.26.3.268

[26]   Lacoste, Y. (1998). Ibn Khaldūn. Naissance de l’histoire, passé du tiers monde. Paris: La Découverte.

[27]   Nasr, S. H. (1968). Science and Civilisation in Islam. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[28]   Needham, J. (1954-2004). Science and Civilization in China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[29]   Rashed, R. (2004). Recherche sur la tradition scientifique arabe. In Actes de la Rencontre syro-libanaise de recherche sur la tradition scientifique arabe (pp. 313-333). Beyrouth: Publication de l’Université Libanaise.

[30]   Rashed, R. (Ed.) (1996). Encyclopedia of the History of Arabic Science. 3 Volumes, London and New York: Routledge.

[31]   Renan, E. (1855). Historire générale et système comparé des langues sémitiques. Paris: Imprimérie Impériale.

[32]   Renan, E. (1882). Averroès et l’Averroïsme. C. Lévy (Ed.). Paris.

[33]   Rūmī, J. (1368/1990 ca.). Mathnavi-e manavi. 3 Volumes. Teheran: Entesharat-e Mawla.

[34]   Rūmī, J. (1925-1940). Masnavi. London: Luzac and Co.
https://ia600601.us.archive.org/27/items/Masnavi1Faen/masnavi%203%20faen.pdf

[35]   Van Dalen, B. (2007). Battānī: Abū Abd Allāh Muhammad ibn Jābir ibn Sinān al-Battānī al-Harrānī al-Sābi. In T. Hockey et al. (Eds.), The Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers (pp. 101-103). New York: Springer.

 
 
Top